Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Woodruff wrote: You don't seem to be doing a very good job of it, then. In fact, it's fascinating just how often you're NOT ignoring me...but I have noticed that it seems to coincide with those times when I haven't said something for which you have no valid response.
Not only that, but you were NOT ignoring me just previous to your ignoring me, which was just previous to NOT ignoring me, which just happened to be just before you ignored me again.
So while I've got your attention now, why don't you go answer them, big boy? Or am I being ignored now again? It's so hard to tell.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
QFTWoodruff wrote:Oh, there's no question at all that my responses are arrogant.
I don't recall saying that arrogance was a good characteristic. However, unlike you, I am able to recognize (and laugh at) my weaknesses. You should try it sometime...maybe you wouldn't be so uptight.jay_a2j wrote:Don't take it so personally Woody. I tend to disregard and ignore anyone who's posts contain nothing of substance. In your case, nothing of substance with a good helping of name calling, condescension and arrogance. (btw someone should probably tell you.... arrogance is NOT a good characteristic to possess)Woodruff wrote: You don't seem to be doing a very good job of it, then. In fact, it's fascinating just how often you're NOT ignoring me...but I have noticed that it seems to coincide with those times when I haven't said something for which you have no valid response.
Not only that, but you were NOT ignoring me just previous to your ignoring me, which was just previous to NOT ignoring me, which just happened to be just before you ignored me again.
So while I've got your attention now, why don't you go answer them, big boy? Or am I being ignored now again? It's so hard to tell.
What's really funny, beezer, is that you and I agree on things far more often than we disagree. And yet, you won't allow yourself to see that because you see my name and presume the worst into whatever it is I've said.beezer wrote:QFTWoodruff wrote:Oh, there's no question at all that my responses are arrogant.
It's nice to see that there are more people realizing this. Your arguments are a joke.
9 pages of posts and over 100 votes says otherwiseSkittles! wrote:That, and no one actually gives a f*ck about what this poll is saying.
Lootifer wrote:I earn well above average income for my area, i'm educated and I support left wing politics.
jbrettlip wrote:You live in New Zealand. We will call you when we need to make another Hobbit movie.
It's a good poll. But only if I win. Otherwise, it's a bad poll. By definition.bradleybadly wrote:9 pages of posts and over 100 votes says otherwiseSkittles! wrote:That, and no one actually gives a f*ck about what this poll is saying.
So you proved that people think Woodruff is a dick - so whatbradleybadly wrote:9 pages of posts and over 100 votes says otherwiseSkittles! wrote:That, and no one actually gives a f*ck about what this poll is saying.
JJM wrote:I don't know how to spell check and why is it that all you easterners think of North Dakotians as idiots
Hadn't noticed those, although I have noticed that some people tend to flame you who normally wouldn't flame...jay_a2j wrote:Woodruff wrote:Either you're not reading very many of my posts or your reading comprehension hasn't improved.jay_a2j wrote:Without flaming? That's all he does in any and all posts directed at me.(That's why he is a GOLD MEMBER of my ban list) Surely you jest.Ray Rider wrote:
Woodruff
-I thought he was fairly well-respected around here. He posts are usually fairly logical and well-founded without flaming, so I'm quite surprised how many votes he has.![]()
Woodruff wrote:I might support tanks rolling down your street.Woodruff wrote:Says the religious nut.Woodruff wrote:That's because you're too stupid to be bothered with.


That's surprising. How many typical liberals justify China's control over Tibet?Ray Rider wrote:Which person's opinions do you respect the least when reading posts in Monkey Business?
BigBallinStalin
-For some reason I always think of him as a typical liberal...I'm not sure what others tend to think of him, however.
And soon to be the biggest dick in this dick-measuring contest!zebraman wrote:So you proved that people think Woodruff is a dick - so whatbradleybadly wrote:9 pages of posts and over 100 votes says otherwiseSkittles! wrote:That, and no one actually gives a f*ck about what this poll is saying.
What's even funnier (and I just now noticed it actually)is how you are insecure about how you're perceived on this site. You can't let a even a single post indirectly referencing you go without being answered and spun to prop yourself up. Even those who are trying to defend youWoodruff wrote:What's really funny, beezer, is that you and I agree on things far more often than we disagree. And yet, you won't allow yourself to see that because you see my name and presume the worst into whatever it is I've said.beezer wrote:QFTWoodruff wrote:Oh, there's no question at all that my responses are arrogant.
It's nice to see that there are more people realizing this. Your arguments are a joke.

I'm on the site a lot (too much, probably) and I like to post a lot (too much, probably)...that's really all it is.beezer wrote:What's even funnier (and I just now noticed it actually)is how you are insecure about how you're perceived on this site. You can't let a even a single post indirectly referencing you go without being answered and spun to prop yourself up. Even those who are trying to defend youWoodruff wrote:What's really funny, beezer, is that you and I agree on things far more often than we disagree. And yet, you won't allow yourself to see that because you see my name and presume the worst into whatever it is I've said.beezer wrote:QFTWoodruff wrote:Oh, there's no question at all that my responses are arrogant.
It's nice to see that there are more people realizing this. Your arguments are a joke.![]()
Oh, no doubt many have voted for me because they don't respect me...but I'm ok with that. I'm not sure why you believe I care that much about how I'm perceived, when the fact of my posting nature should point out just how clearly I really don't care. If I cared that much, I wouldn't be so arrogant about it now, would I?beezer wrote:Your arguments don't amount to much more than an accusation against the opposing poster having "reading comprehension" problems or "how sorry you feel for them" whenever you get in a pickle. I actually re-examined my earlier conversations with you because I thought maybe I could've been too harsh in my assessment, but this poll bears out that I'm not the only one who has seen you for how you operate.
beezer wrote:Your arguments don't amount to much more than an accusation against the opposing poster having "reading comprehension" problems or "how sorry you feel for them" whenever you get in a pickle.
Woodruff wrote:That said, I would suggest that you haven't read very many of my posts if you hold the opinion that my arguments amount to an accusation against the opposing poster. Perhaps you should look into that a bit more.
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
Perhaps you can point out how I could effectively rebut such a statement, otherwise? I wasn't attacking toward him...I was simply stating that perhaps he should look more into my postings.DangerBoy wrote:beezer wrote:Your arguments don't amount to much more than an accusation against the opposing poster having "reading comprehension" problems or "how sorry you feel for them" whenever you get in a pickle.Woodruff wrote:That said, I would suggest that you haven't read very many of my posts if you hold the opinion that my arguments amount to an accusation against the opposing poster. Perhaps you should look into that a bit more.Right back to the template, eh woodruff!
JJM wrote:I don't know how to spell check and why is it that all you easterners think of North Dakotians as idiots
Lets get the supreme court to check how democratic the vote was, that always worked in free and fair elections!BigBallinStalin wrote:THIS VOTE IS RIGGED!! 153 people and still rising? You gotta be kidding me, not that many look at this crap.
ACORN is involved in this multi-scheme. So, are the conservatives.
I would suggest you have a coke and a smile and shuthefuckup. <smile>Woodruff wrote: Perhaps you can point out how I could effectively rebut such a statement, otherwise? I wasn't attacking toward him...I was simply stating that perhaps he should look more into my postings.

on the river?Phatscotty wrote:rolling....just rolling

b.k. barunt wrote:On the reefer.
Honibaz