Moderator: Community Team

XiGamesNot religion, but people who use religion in their own purposeKid_A wrote:interesting![]()
I had no idea that religion caused war

XiGamessaxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:It's somewhat interesting how it's "Muslim conquest" on the one hand but on the other "Missions abroad" during colonialism.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Nice pick! Hell of an eye. Just wondering why Christianity seems to be the most appealing and most dominant.cyrenius wrote:See 5000 years of Religion in 90 seconds
http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/Religion.swf
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Most appealing? I think it may have more to do with the major European powers having total control around all of the globe.Phatscotty wrote:Nice pick! Hell of an eye. Just wondering why Christianity seems to be the most appealing and most dominant.cyrenius wrote:See 5000 years of Religion in 90 seconds
http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/Religion.swf
I think it's off a bit, islam is the second religion in EthiopiaSkittles! wrote:I have a problem with this map. Like not showing Ethiopia as a Christian nation, yet it was the first nation to become Christian.

XiGamesYes, I was including early empire building under the term 'colonialism', though this may techically not be fully correct. iirc the video displays "Missions Abroad" around 1600 or a bit earlier.Doc_Brown wrote:I think it's valid by that time. If you were talking about the spread of Christianity in the 1500s-1600s, then yes, Christian Imperialists is probably a better term. However, during the Colonialism of the 1800s, there was a marked separation between the political forces and the religious influence.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
It looks like the clip doesn't include actual dates. I assumed that Missions Abroad didn't include the early conquest of the Americas, simply because the term is usually used more in the context of the Missionaries that England sent out through the 1800s. Indeed, the clip has Christianity well established in eastern North America and most of Central America before it uses that term.MeDeFe wrote:Yes, I was including early empire building under the term 'colonialism', though this may techically not be fully correct. iirc the video displays "Missions Abroad" around 1600 or a bit earlier.Doc_Brown wrote:I think it's valid by that time. If you were talking about the spread of Christianity in the 1500s-1600s, then yes, Christian Imperialists is probably a better term. However, during the Colonialism of the 1800s, there was a marked separation between the political forces and the religious influence.
I used a ruler and measured it out between the years 0 and 2000...Doc_Brown wrote:It looks like the clip doesn't include actual dates. I assumed that Missions Abroad didn't include the early conquest of the Americas, simply because the term is usually used more in the context of the Missionaries that England sent out through the 1800s. Indeed, the clip has Christianity well established in eastern North America and most of Central America before it uses that term.MeDeFe wrote:Yes, I was including early empire building under the term 'colonialism', though this may techically not be fully correct. iirc the video displays "Missions Abroad" around 1600 or a bit earlier.Doc_Brown wrote:I think it's valid by that time. If you were talking about the spread of Christianity in the 1500s-1600s, then yes, Christian Imperialists is probably a better term. However, during the Colonialism of the 1800s, there was a marked separation between the political forces and the religious influence.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:I used a ruler and measured it out between the years 0 and 2000...Doc_Brown wrote:It looks like the clip doesn't include actual dates. I assumed that Missions Abroad didn't include the early conquest of the Americas, simply because the term is usually used more in the context of the Missionaries that England sent out through the 1800s. Indeed, the clip has Christianity well established in eastern North America and most of Central America before it uses that term.MeDeFe wrote:Yes, I was including early empire building under the term 'colonialism', though this may techically not be fully correct. iirc the video displays "Missions Abroad" around 1600 or a bit earlier.Doc_Brown wrote:I think it's valid by that time. If you were talking about the spread of Christianity in the 1500s-1600s, then yes, Christian Imperialists is probably a better term. However, during the Colonialism of the 1800s, there was a marked separation between the political forces and the religious influence.