American Civil War

by **PassIsPaws** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:15 pm

any comments or ideas im open to pretty much everything and anything

i know i still need to add names to all of those places and add army bonuses

and i know how to do the xml once everything is done

but i just want the publics ideas

by **WidowMakers** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:24 pm

I like the idea but I think there are way too many territories. Plus the fleet idea is good but since they are so close together once someone gets 3 or more they have a real easy time getting the rest. Plus I don't get the idea of the cities. Maybe if you just made the map with 60 or less territories and then looked at it again. I do like the idea though.

by **PassIsPaws** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:34 pm

well you see the thing is i want another map like 2.0
with LOTS of territories so it takes more than 10 rounds to finish or the winner is set in stone

but thanks for the ideas ill work on making a few less areas in my update if everyoen else thinks so

by **joystickgenie** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:35 pm

I have to agree just to many territories. This would always have to be a large game like 6 or more people for it to be fun.

by **Lt. Valerian** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:11 pm

I like the idea, but agree that the number of territories make the map too daunting...

by **casper** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:05 pm

I think it's a cool map to pursue. I do agree there are way to many territories but some of the territories could be consolidated. And the fleet penalty seems a little harsh. Also I do not like the extra mountains you added... there are certainly no mountains in Illinois/Indiana. Something more like the original map might be best... :-P

http://sillysoft.net/lux/maps/American%20Civil%20War

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:39 pm

I was going to make tis map this summer, but you beat me to it. Looks good, just cut down the territories

by **luckiekevin** on Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:51 am

I think a North/South (blue/grey) division might be a cool thing with a large bonus for holding either half that is comprised of a few country bonuses.

by **Wisse** on Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:25 am

you ahve to ask lux for the copyrights...

by **PassIsPaws** on Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:19 pm

i asked the creator of the map not lux he said to go ahead

by **KEYOGI** on Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:55 pm

I'm not familiar with how Lux works, but I would assume the original creator of the map would hand over copyright to Lux.

by **Osirus_Oblivion7** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:22 pm

I love the idea. Keep the # of territories, make the pic bigger, North / South bonus... Yeah I'm a fan of 2.0 myself and would love to play a huge 6 player game on this map when finished. keep up the good work

by **Kupo666** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:41 pm

I like the number of territories, makes it a bigger war. And, as the bloddiest Amercian war, it was huge. I'd suggest a bonus for the North and South, and making it so you only lose armies when you hold no fleets, not when you hold less than two. Plus, you need different mountains. And might I just ask why Florida and other Southern states are blue, while Pennsylvania and other Northern states are grey?

by **PassIsPaws** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:21 pm

lol which is it

the bigger the better or more condensed?

by **johloh** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:42 pm

the bigger the better or more condensed?

poll it!

by **adam3b58** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:37 pm

i REALLY love the style you've got going on; the textures of the territories and the pebbly mountains.

the playability looks interesting so far, in terms of uncrossable borders

i support this map

by **Jesse, Bad Boy** on Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:51 pm

Maybe my Geographic Knowledge of the 19th Century is lacking, but I could have sworn that Long Island existed then, so what's up with it missing?

by **Nikolai** on Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:12 am

I like the idea, and that includes the part about it being a big map. Lots of territores is good. I was wondering, however, why it seems like the Southern states consist of more territories than the Northern states? The concept of a big additional bonus if you can unite either the North or the South is good. I'm not clear on how cities work - clarify the instructions? That'll do for a start.

by **PassIsPaws** on Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:41 pm

Some things happend and so i had to draw the map over by hand, which is why it looks sketchy...

this way there isnt any copyrights though As all i did was look at my giant atlas and draw every inch by guess and compare.

but yeah clearer labels will be next

and a new background too

by **Guiscard** on Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:27 pm

Err... not too great now to be honest.

Get rid of the massive bevel, the thick borders, the whole bubble thing... Forget about impassables, rivers and bridges for the moment and just get a simple map with thin borders and continent colours which aren't so bright.

by **Osirus_Oblivion7** on Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:39 pm

WHAT THE F*CKING SH*T MAN!!!! I hope you have a damn good reason for this... Damn good reason... Come on man you could have at least kept the blue/gray color scheme, man... And Ports, ports would be better than fleets... Sh*t dude please hire a graphic artist, i don't care if you have to sell yourself to chinese railworkers till your legs fall of... come on man... come on... damn... wtf... WTF... <walks away in disgust>

by **Molacole** on Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:09 pm

Osirus_Oblivion7 wrote:WHAT THE F*CKING SH*T MAN!!!! I hope you have a damn good reason for this... Damn good reason... Come on man you could have at least kept the blue/gray color scheme, man... And Ports, ports would be better than fleets... Sh*t dude please hire a graphic artist, i don't care if you have to sell yourself to chinese railworkers till your legs fall of... come on man... come on... damn... wtf... WTF... <walks away in disgust>

American Civil War

Do you like it, is it worth pursuing

American Civil War

Who is online