Moderator: Community Team
Good for you!Timminz wrote:I'm entitled to whatever I want, because I come from old money. In other words...
..f*ck you! Got mine!
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
I think this attitude transcends generations. But if there was an entitlement generation more intense than others in America, I see it as those who were young people in the late 60s - early 70sbedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things. Do you agree?
No, I don't think that's the correct way to thinkbedub1 wrote:Do you think they are right?
I do think that people are entitled to certain protections from the government. I don't think people are entitled to other peoples' money for the most part. I also think protections are being redefined to mean providing for.bedub1 wrote:Do you think people are entitled to certain things?
Right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness. The Bill of Rights.bedub1 wrote:if so, what are they?
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
Hence the wonderful problems we've been given now that these people have been in charge of our government for the past 20 years.DangerBoy wrote:I think this attitude transcends generations. But if there was an entitlement generation more intense than others in America, I see it as those who were young people in the late 60s - early 70sbedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things. Do you agree?
Yes, I agree there is a growing generation of people who seem to believe this.bedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things. Do you agree? Do you think they are right? Do you think people are entitled to certain things? if so, what are they?

bedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things.
Yes.bedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things.
Depends on which "certain things" we're talking about.bedub1 wrote:Do you agree?
Depends on which "certain things" we're talking about.bedub1 wrote:Do you think they are right?
Yes. A reasonably safe place to live (not necessarily own). Enough food to survive in a minimally healthy manner. The opportunity to work to provide these things (this is probably the key).bedub1 wrote:Do you think people are entitled to certain things? if so, what are they?
I think what you're getting at is has it gone too far, right? There will probably always be some group of entitlement programs. The fact is that they cannot continue to fund them at this level without bankrupting people through higher taxes. We should turn this back against Obama & the Dems.bedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things. Do you agree? Do you think they are right? Do you think people are entitled to certain things? if so, what are they?
b.k. barunt wrote:Then you must be a pseudoatheist. If you were a real atheist Dan Brown would make your nipples hard.
If that's the case, why not look at better places to cut spending. Let's take a look at a chart of the 2008 budget for the USA.silvanricky wrote:The fact is that they cannot continue to fund them at this level without bankrupting people through higher taxes.

I agree that slashing the budget for Defense/Pentagon would greatly reduce the deficit in the short term - but - you have to realize that up until around this year (give or take a few years), social security, Medicare/Medicaid were not drags on the budget - they were actually helpful, but instead of saving that money from social security and other programs and being honest about it, they withdrew all extra money from the past to try to close the budget deficit and make it look smaller.Timminz wrote:If that's the case, why not look at better places to cut spending. Let's take a look at a chart of the 2008 budget for the USA.
It looks to me like you could cut the equivalent of every single one of the "entitlement programs" out of the pentagon's budget, and it would still be, by far, the biggest portion of the budget.
Or is the war in Iraq really making the lives of Americans that much better.
The Department of Defense is the #1 job of the federal government, so its budget should in reality be close to 100%. Education, Job Hungry, Health, Human Services, Community Development, Housing, and Agriculture should be run by the states.Timminz wrote:If that's the case, why not look at better places to cut spending. Let's take a look at a chart of the 2008 budget for the USA.silvanricky wrote:The fact is that they cannot continue to fund them at this level without bankrupting people through higher taxes.
It looks to me like you could cut the equivalent of every single one of the "entitlement programs" out of the pentagon's budget, and it would still be, by far, the biggest portion of the budget.
Or is the war in Iraq really making the lives of Americans that much better.
Yes, since lack of regulation worked so very well in the 1930's.Night Strike wrote: The Department of Defense is the #1 job of the federal government, so its budget should in reality be close to 100%. Education, Job Hungry, Health, Human Services, Community Development, Housing, and Agriculture should be run by the states.
Why do you (and others) assume that fiscal conservatives don't want to reduce the budget for the Pentagon? That seems to be a recurring argument around here.Timminz wrote:If that's the case, why not look at better places to cut spending. Let's take a look at a chart of the 2008 budget for the USA.silvanricky wrote:The fact is that they cannot continue to fund them at this level without bankrupting people through higher taxes.
It looks to me like you could cut the equivalent of every single one of the "entitlement programs" out of the pentagon's budget, and it would still be, by far, the biggest portion of the budget.
Or is the war in Iraq really making the lives of Americans that much better.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I suppose it is because they often talk about cutting "entitlements" and never the defense budget.thegreekdog wrote:Why do you (and others) assume that fiscal conservatives don't want to reduce the budget for the Pentagon? That seems to be a recurring argument around here.Timminz wrote:If that's the case, why not look at better places to cut spending. Let's take a look at a chart of the 2008 budget for the USA.silvanricky wrote:The fact is that they cannot continue to fund them at this level without bankrupting people through higher taxes.
It looks to me like you could cut the equivalent of every single one of the "entitlement programs" out of the pentagon's budget, and it would still be, by far, the biggest portion of the budget.
Or is the war in Iraq really making the lives of Americans that much better.
Certainly, you wouldn't mind compulsory military service, would you?tzor wrote:Yes, I agree there is a growing generation of people who seem to believe this.bedub1 wrote:I believe there is a generation of people who believe they are Entitled to certain things. Do you agree? Do you think they are right? Do you think people are entitled to certain things? if so, what are they?
They are idiots.
I hate to quote a Democrat but in this case ...
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
I believe in the exact inverse; we are not all entitled; we are all called to duty.
Oh, I'm in no disagreement. Just poking fun at Tzor's post about one's call to duty.thegreekdog wrote:BBS, I think you can safely assume that most fiscal conservatives on this site want to cut the defense budget too. At least that's what I've garnered in the last year or so.
But you have to distinguish between "conservatives" and "fiscal conservatives."thegreekdog wrote:BBS, I think you can safely assume that most fiscal conservatives on this site want to cut the defense budget too. At least that's what I've garnered in the last year or so.

Really? Seemed like the government dropped the ball on that one, not the people.72o wrote:
Just look at Athens. That's what happens when the populous becomes dependent on a nanny state.
How so? By informing the people that they have run out of money and can no longer support them all?BigBallinStalin wrote:Really? Seemed like the government dropped the ball on that one, not the people.72o wrote:
Just look at Athens. That's what happens when the populous becomes dependent on a nanny state.
