Moderator: Community Team
good point Fitzy.AAFitz wrote:Absolutely. There should always be a moderator in disguise, or at least the threat of one. Those who do not break the rules should not have to suffer the tiny miniscule minority that cannot follow them.


i think with the time zones there is not rarely a time when there isnt a mod online hidden or not...Blitzaholic wrote:good point Fitzy.AAFitz wrote:Absolutely. There should always be a moderator in disguise, or at least the threat of one. Those who do not break the rules should not have to suffer the tiny miniscule minority that cannot follow them.

negative, I am a meat popsiclenatty_dread wrote:Mods are people too.
so because I hide my status (even though I answer any and all pms i receive) you don't have "respect" for me lol just because a mod appears offline does not mean that they are not. If a mod shows online and you need them would you not just pm them anyway?.. Then why not just pm that person even if they are not online?VampireM wrote:i just had a few things to add, i know this may be considered off topic but i still feels it fits in the thread..
to mg: when ed said "emergency" i figured it was to be taken as a CC emergency not compared to any RL life one..
you have to admit that the mods that dont hide there online status deserve props since currently most mods are.. sherkaner, LV, andy, Tupence just to name a couple are some of the mods that i respect greatly for not hiding their status..
Ah, global powers. My only power is telekinesis, but I wouldn't call that a global power.Bones2484 wrote:You know what might help with some of the misconceptions here?
If some of the [new] Mods would stop acting like they have "global" powers. Maybe then some of these people would stop thinking they can do everything (ie: lock threads, ban users, etc) and realize very few actually can.
Ways to contact the Webmaster and Admins are in place, and known by the Team.PLAYER57832 wrote:I would like to see a third option:
Namely "office hours".
I don't know what requirements are, but with 54 mods, it should be possible to have at least "peak" times covered. Also, I think there should be a way for any mod to contact one of the admins, in emergencies. (that last may already be in place?) The times its needed might be very few, but when it is... it is NEEDED QUICKLY!
All of the emergencies, real or otherwise we have had, have all been attended to within half a day. And for the extreme cases, hardly more than 24-48 hours. If the site shuts down for a couple of days in the future, then we may have a problem. But our downtime has been quite minimal on Conquer Club (especially ever since some recent server upgrades, and one update planned to decrease server load even more). As for other cases, so far everything has been dealt with quickly. And really, we are lucky at Conquer Club to have to deal with few "emergencies."As per "emergencies", there were a few I encountered in the 2 1/2 years I have played here.
Probably the most serious was one person posting another's personnal information.
Other issues included somebody posting about 50 threads (NOT the "logic dictates" or anything the least bit funny, this was purely obnoxiousness), someone who posted what seemed to be a very innocent thread and then POOF, you got blasted with a hard porn picture. (emergency because some kids do come here) Another had a, not sure if "virus" was technically correct, but a link that caused anybody who clicked on it problems (I cannot remember if it was just a very, very looong download or what it was).
you can put moderators on ignore now just so you knowScott-Land wrote:For those that didn't get a chance to read my post in Sugs.... yes they should be able to hide their online status and yes we should be able to also put them on ignore with the exceptions of admins ! Players first and all that jive.
jakewilliams wrote:negative, I am a meat popsiclenatty_dread wrote:Mods are people too.
Really ? Sweet...... Thx.ljex wrote:you can put moderators on ignore now just so you knowScott-Land wrote:For those that didn't get a chance to read my post in Sugs.... yes they should be able to hide their online status and yes we should be able to also put them on ignore with the exceptions of admins ! Players first and all that jive.
oh common clappy i did not say "i only respect the mods that dont hide there online status".. and if it came off that way im sorry.. the mods on this site do there job, and do it efficiently.. but it would brighten so many players days just to see ur online status.. my post was just about giving the extra prop to the guys that must be hit with pm's all the time, and probably more seeing as people may message them since they can see that they are online... no disrespect meant beforeclapper011 wrote:so because I hide my status (even though I answer any and all pms i receive) you don't have "respect" for me lol just because a mod appears offline does not mean that they are not. If a mod shows online and you need them would you not just pm them anyway?.. Then why not just pm that person even if they are not online?VampireM wrote:i just had a few things to add, i know this may be considered off topic but i still feels it fits in the thread..
to mg: when ed said "emergency" i figured it was to be taken as a CC emergency not compared to any RL life one..
you have to admit that the mods that dont hide there online status deserve props since currently most mods are.. sherkaner, LV, andy, Tupence just to name a couple are some of the mods that i respect greatly for not hiding their status..![]()
oh and eddy... A mod does NOT need to appear online to help... I am online most times and I am always quick to answer questions. Just because I appear offline does not mean i am not here to help as I am ALWAYS here to help.
clappy

This is what I have done the handful of times I had a real situation. Usually, I pm'd either whoever was on line or.. Andy/Twillthegreekdog wrote:Okay, I'm going to throw a hypothetical out there.
Let's say I have an emergency that needs a moderator. And that moderator needs to be available right that instant. I can probably do a variety of things to get a moderator's attention. Speaking only for myself, I would pm a bunch of moderators related to whatever issue I'm having. For example, if it's an issue with the fora, I would pm all of the forum/discussion moderators. I can do this whether or not the moderators are online, offline, or online and hidden. Then those moderators who receive my message can address me as they see fit.
I think that is the issue, for those who began this "quest", though I have been quite pleased with the speed of the response the very few times speed was important.thegreekdog wrote: So, perhaps the issue is not that the moderators are online and hidden. Perhaps the issue is that the moderators are not addressing emergency situations in a timely enough fashion for some users. Would this be a better way to frame the issue?
AndyDufresne wrote:Ways to contact the Webmaster and Admins are in place, and known by the Team.PLAYER57832 wrote:I would like to see a third option:
Namely "office hours".
I don't know what requirements are, but with 54 mods, it should be possible to have at least "peak" times covered. Also, I think there should be a way for any mod to contact one of the admins, in emergencies. (that last may already be in place?) The times its needed might be very few, but when it is... it is NEEDED QUICKLY!And have been in place for quite a while.
AndyDufresne wrote: Admins do have office hours, mine are usually in the morning of the USA. Lackattack is often on during mornings and early afternoons. But I don't think we need to require our wonderful, helpful, and eager volunteers to have office hours too.
AndyDufresne wrote:All of the emergencies, real or otherwise we have had, have all been attended to within half a day. And for the extreme cases, hardly more than 24-48 hours.As per "emergencies", there were a few I encountered in the 2 1/2 years I have played here.
Probably the most serious was one person posting another's personnal information.
Other issues included somebody posting about 50 threads (NOT the "logic dictates" or anything the least bit funny, this was purely obnoxiousness), someone who posted what seemed to be a very innocent thread and then POOF, you got blasted with a hard porn picture. (emergency because some kids do come here) Another had a, not sure if "virus" was technically correct, but a link that caused anybody who clicked on it problems (I cannot remember if it was just a very, very looong download or what it was).
AndyDufresne wrote: If the site shuts down for a couple of days in the future, then we may have a problem.
I agree.AndyDufresne wrote: But just to reiterate, we want our Volunteers to have fun and participate in the Community, and by extension help the Community maintain and grow. Things that work against notion, we're not so fond of.
mgconstruction wrote:Ed this is not directed at you, just using your quoteedwinissweet wrote:Ok so the point dumping happened... What was the emergency?
emergency
A serious situation or occurrence that happens unexpectedly and demands immediate action.
In the Kid A case, he got punished for it, and the people that abused the situation will most likely get punished too.
The report for Kid A was made at 12:51 am. It was solved at 1:17 am. It was less than half an hour.. just how much faster can things really get done?![]()
Anyone calling anything on here an Emergency needs a reality check.
It's a Fing game people!
The only thing on this site that could remotely be called an emergency is if the site was hacked & all our personal info (credit card#s etc) were stolen.
Other than that, get the F over it & quit crying about who got what or points being cheated etc.
Um, how is this not on topic? My reply is a direct response to the topic at hand. Some think Mods should not be able to hide in case of emergency. One example of an emergency stated was in the case of someone dumping points. I pointed out that its hardly an emergency. Furthermore, I did not direct my comments at any one person. I just stated my opinion in general on the whole of what we consider an emergency issue. So how you could even remotely take that as a flame or baiting is just plain......<thinking of a non flaming clean word>....silly.edwinissweet wrote:Mg. thank you for your input into the discussion. Please keep the comments on opinions only about the topic on the poll. If things get out of a hand again, then this will be locked and then we will never know what the forum-active community thinks of the matter. Your comments could be considered a flame, and or bait. So please, lets keep it classy guys