Moderator: Community Team

natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Im not an english expert, but when I try i am fairly articulate.demonfork wrote:
I have also read that it is okay to end a sentence with a preposition as long at that preposition is critical to the meaning of the sentence, for example...
The joke is "A preposition is a thing not to end a sentence with." You can't fix your sentence to be grammatically correct: "Never use a preposition with which to end a sentence…"?jonesthecurl wrote:We were taught at school, Never use a preposition to end a sentence with.
Decent…wait hey!Army of GOD wrote:FattyMcFat! How are ya!
I remember hearing a famous quote from Winston Churchill about this. Ironically, the first time I heard this rule was when I was not in the US, but was overseas. (I heard it from a teacher of English in that country) That said, when speaking I rarely do end with a preposition.demonfork wrote:I have always been told that ending a sentence with a preposition is a big no no. Recently I have been doing some research on the matter and I have found that no such rule even exists (in English) and that the rule might just be and inadvertent carry over from Latin.
I have read some say that the sentence...
"Who did you vote for?"
Would be more correct if written in the form...
"For whom did you vote?"
While others say that either version is correct.
I have also read that it is okay to end a sentence with a preposition as long at that preposition is critical to the meaning of the sentence, for example...
"What did you just step on?" makes no sense if written "What did you just step?" although it could be written "On what did you just step?" but that sounds completely retarded.
So WTF?
Are there any English experts out there that might have something definitive on this matter.

No this populist idea that it's proper if people understand is bottom line wrong.john9blue wrote:It's "Proper English" if 99.9% of English speakers understand it. I see nothing wrong with ending a sentence with propositions. Some people I know (my dad in particular) end sentences with conjunctions when they speak. They'll end a sentence with "and", "or", "so", etc., and just trail off. It's annoying as hell because I have to wait to see whether they have anything else to say. People need to stop doing that shit.

Then why has proper English changed over the years?nesterdude wrote:No this populist idea that it's proper if people understand is bottom line wrong.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
It changes slowly.john9blue wrote:Then why has proper English changed over the years?nesterdude wrote:No this populist idea that it's proper if people understand is bottom line wrong.

Proper would be "For what are you looking?" if you want to get technical72o wrote:With a question, it's acceptable, because technically the sentence structure is altered to account for the interrogative sentence.
"What are you looking for?", as a declarative sentence, would read, "You are looking for what."
"What" is the object of the preposition in both sentences. It's just out of place because it's a question.
Now, if you were to say, "The super-secret dice hack is what I am looking for.", that would be wrong. You should say, "I'm looking for the super-secret dice hack."

That's just passive voice vs. active voice. There's nothing grammatically wrong with the passive voice.nesterdude wrote:Now, if you were to say, "The super-secret dice hack is what I am looking for.", that would be wrong. You should say, "I'm looking for the super-secret dice hack."
Nice example.nesterdude wrote:To ensure that our message is carried over.