nuh-uh. it's totally an science.InkL0sed wrote:extinction is a art
Moderator: Community Team
nuh-uh. it's totally an science.InkL0sed wrote:extinction is a art
You could have Wiki'd tectonic plates and at least BS'd your way to knowing what they are and how they workTHORNHEART wrote:Tectonic plates my land are ginormous rocks (or something along that lines) larger than continents. They are UNDERNEATH the surface of the earth. Therefor its kinda impossible that they affect fossils of fish and such on mount everest now on to earthquakes whic are caused by cracks tears and colliding of these plates (I don't see how that has relevance to the topic)
Floods.jonesthecurl wrote:OK Thorny: what makes mountains?
So it either happened really really quickly in an undefined way, or it took thousands of years in the way that the scientists say.THORNHEART wrote:mountains come from these plates we were talking about crashing into each other splitting and slowly being pushed skyward.
this process would take thousands of years unless there was a sudden and catclismic happening that would have caused it to form almost instantly....this happening all at once could account for the fossils and stuff found on the mountains
funny a world wide flood could be a way for this to happen as the bible states the waters from under the earth broke forth and in another place the bile says in the days of peleg when the earth was divided assunder...which some take to be about how the continents and such were ripped apart and formed.
Be fair , when I was six the eight year olds seemed pretty bright to me as well, Thorny will be fine once he reaches his teens.Neoteny wrote:Because the made-up stories of power-hungry men aren't actually reality! Also, because there is no geological evidence of a worldwide flood. There are eight year olds out there who could have answered that one for ya, thorny!
The problem with your idea of it happening all at once is several, but the biggest issue is the layering and the fact that there are quite distinct and seperate fossils from various layers. This absolutely could not be explained by a worldwide flood.THORNHEART wrote:mountains come from these plates we were talking about crashing into each other splitting and slowly being pushed skyward.
this process would take thousands of years unless there was a sudden and catclismic happening that would have caused it to form almost instantly....this happening all at once could account for the fossils and stuff found on the mountains
funny a world wide flood could be a way for this to happen as the bible states the waters from under the earth broke forth and in another place the bile says in the days of peleg when the earth was divided assunder...which some take to be about how the continents and such were ripped apart and formed.
Lionz wrote:Neoteny,
If Genesis is made-up stories of power-hungry men, then where do freemasonry and Bohemian Grove fit in?
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.


Not a logical conclusion. That just suggests that there have been a lot of living creatures over time.Lionz wrote:![]()

You know...Cain the Freemason and Abel from the Bohemian Grove. <smile>jay_a2j wrote:Lionz wrote:Neoteny,
If Genesis is made-up stories of power-hungry men, then where do freemasonry and Bohemian Grove fit in?
I remember when MTV actually showed music videos...does that count?Lionz wrote:If there's a conspiracy by power hungry men to get people to be Bible believers, then what happened in the 20th century and what's been happening so far in the 21st? Who's remembers VH1 before 1995?
He's saying that the sheer volume of animals that have lived throughout the vast time involved in history will certainly explain the number of fossils that we have uncovered, even granting your processes.Lionz wrote:What's not a logical conclusion? Is there a dead animal encased in sedimentary rock that was not quickly and deeply buried by an onslaught of wet sediment?
How about instead of a site dedicated to "Creation Science", you reference some sights that are dedicated to REAL science? Too much to ask?Lionz wrote:Timminz,
How about try reading stuff on a number of pages from here if you're interested in having an actual discussion on where mountains have come from?
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... view2.html
I didn't say anything of the sort. Do you really need to try to put words into my mouth to try to score a point?Lionz wrote:So there's no dead animal encased in sedimentary rock that was not quickly and deeply buried by an onslaught of wet sediment, but local floods over millions of years would explain any?
Most folks around here know what I think of Wikipedia. I don't personally know that much about geology, so I'm really not in a position to dispute anything...but I would trust Wikipedia before I'd trust a website called "Creation Science".Lionz wrote:And how much did you look at there before meaning to claim there's no real science there if that's what you're meaning to do? How about try to actually refute something from there using science? Too much to ask?
Exactly what you said happened to them. I wasn't arguing that point at all. I was arguing your statement that we shouldn't have as many fossils as we do, which is ludicrous when one actually considers the vast numbers of animals that have existed on Earth over the course of history.Lionz wrote:Did you not call on vast time and then say even granting your processes? If there is a dead animal encased in sedimentary rock that was not quickly and deeply buried by an onslaught of wet sediment, then what happened to it or them?
No, there is nothing there that I want to try to refute, because it's not worth my time to read "science" coming from a "Creation Science" website. I'll go read Wikipedia, HowStuffWorks or, better yet, Digg.Lionz wrote:And is there something here you want to try to refute or no?
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... view2.html