Moderator: Community Team
Dude, they stole it from the Aphidzoids.tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:I think the Cananites have the most legitimate claim. Let me know if you see one.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Of course google won't have anything on them, they were pre-historic. Which by definition means that they pre-dated history, meaning there is no officially recorded history concerning the Aphidzoids. But trust me, they were indeed there prior to the Canaanites.tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:Aphidzoids, you know I actually googled that one just to be safe
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
This is a good idea.Army of GOD wrote:I say, evacuate everyone from that area and nuke the f*ck out of Jerusalem. They won't have anything to fight over anymore...
Just in point of clarification, the very first shot in the 1967 war was not by Arab League forces but by the Zionist Air Force when 250 Zionist bombers unilaterally entered Egyptian airspace and destroyed the entire Egyptian air force on the ground. This came two years after the Zionist air force bombed a dam construction project inside Syria.tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
this is a liesaxitoxin wrote:Just in point of clarification, the very first shot in the 1967 war was not by Arab League forces but by the Zionist Air Force when 250 Zionist bombers unilaterally entered Egyptian airspace and destroyed the entire Egyptian air force on the ground. This came two years after the Zionist air force bombed a dam construction project inside Syria.tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.
On the topic of Israel, it bears noting that the reckless, bumbling so-called "German" government has been more instrumental than any other nation in the development of the Zionist WMD program. They have been peddling submarines to the Zionist navy knowing that they are being retrofitted to cruise-missile platforms to form a second-strike force. The merry-go-round of international gangsters in the Bundeskanzleramt is now actively conspiring to unleash the nuclear apocalypse on the middle east.
FURTHER, are Katy Perry's Honkers Too Hot for 'Sesame Street'? That's what TMZ is saying. I was like WTF? http://www.tmz.com/2010/09/22/katy-perr ... o-breasts/
The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.
Well, it seems you are correct that Israel started the actual war. After rechecking my sources, I noticed that. I suppose I should have been more thorough. However, they were not unprovoked. They even declared to Egypt that any closing of the Suez Canal would be seen as an act of war or justification for war. And then Egypt proceeded to close the canal to Israeli shipping. So, it's not exactly clear who is at ultimate "fault" for the war, but the fact remains that, once the war started, the Israeli military quickly mopped up the Arab armies.saxitoxin wrote:Just in point of clarification, the very first shot in the 1967 war was not by Arab League forces but by the Zionist Air Force when 250 Zionist bombers unilaterally entered Egyptian airspace and destroyed the entire Egyptian air force on the ground. This came two years after the Zionist air force bombed a dam construction project inside Syria.tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.
On the topic of Israel, it bears noting that the reckless, bumbling so-called "German" government has been more instrumental than any other nation in the development of the Zionist WMD program. They have been peddling submarines to the Zionist navy knowing that they are being retrofitted to cruise-missile platforms to form a second-strike force. The merry-go-round of international gangsters in the Bundeskanzleramt is now actively conspiring to unleash the nuclear apocalypse on the middle east.
FURTHER, are Katy Perry's Honkers Too Hot for 'Sesame Street'? That's what TMZ is saying. I was like WTF? http://www.tmz.com/2010/09/22/katy-perr ... o-breasts/
Well, while it was rather unusual, it's not like the Jews simply took it. I think the whole thing was largely a response to WW2 and the holocaust. Britian was instrumental in the creation of Israel. And besides, it's not like religion was the sole claim they had to the land, they were the ancient inhabitants of the land, so that could be construed as a legitimate claim. Of course, that claim is sort of based on the Old Testament, but still, not really having to do with religion.PLAYER57832 wrote:The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.
Well, while this would probably solve the problem, I highly doubt any of the involved would subscribe to this. I'm sure they would stongly object to their holy city being destroyed. And remember, Jerusalem is not just a holy city for Islam and Judaism, but in a way, for Christianity as well. What an odd occurance...that one city would be held so important by the three major world religions.The Bison King wrote:This is a good idea.Army of GOD wrote:I say, evacuate everyone from that area and nuke the f*ck out of Jerusalem. They won't have anything to fight over anymore...
2dimes wrote:I was the one using the term "big". The TMZ guy complained they were too "hot" and made his nephew or something, could have been son, and these are not my words because I think they are inapropriate for use in discribing a minor. "pop a boner."
Edit: player jumps the que and ruins the internet again.
If i declared that you must let me have sex with your girlfriend, and you refused, and - in response - I stabbed you, is it your fault for provoking me?tkr4lf wrote:However, they were not unprovoked. They even declared to Egypt that any closing of the Suez Canal would be seen as an act of war or justification for war. And then Egypt proceeded to close the canal to Israeli shipping.
wrong again, Katy's jugs aren't big enough for Sesame Street -- Sesame Street deserves giant-sized fun-funs, like freakishly, weird-sized onestkr4lf wrote:On the Katy Perry thing, no, I do not think her boobs are too big for Sesame Street. I think her boobs are just the right size for Sesame Street.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Perhaps they aren't the perfect size for Sesame Street, perhaps bigger, even massive breasts, I'm talking the kind that could be used as weapons, are in order. I guess the question is, how big of breasts should our young ones be seeing? And does it even matter? I think not.saxitoxin wrote:If i declared that you must let me have sex with your girlfriend, and you refused, and - in response - I stabbed you, is it your fault for provoking me?tkr4lf wrote:However, they were not unprovoked. They even declared to Egypt that any closing of the Suez Canal would be seen as an act of war or justification for war. And then Egypt proceeded to close the canal to Israeli shipping.
Well, I would say no on that one, as that is a personal matter between the two of us. However, the Suez Canal thing is a major world affair. The shipping going on through the canal is quite important to a number of nations, including Israel. Therefore, they could easily have construed that as a threat to their national interests. It's not like they were the first country to go to war over something of that nature. The US government does stuff like that all the time. If you intentionally step on another countries toes, denying them things that they need, then be prepared for a harsh response.
And since we're getting into hypotheticals here, let's say that Panama decided that the US was not allowed to use their canal anymore. What do you think the response would be?wrong again, Katy's jugs aren't big enough for Sesame Street -- Sesame Street deserves giant-sized fun-funs, like freakishly, weird-sized onestkr4lf wrote:On the Katy Perry thing, no, I do not think her boobs are too big for Sesame Street. I think her boobs are just the right size for Sesame Street.
That's a good one too I think because...tkr4lf wrote:And since we're getting into hypotheticals here, let's say that Panama decided that the US was not allowed to use their canal anymore. What do you think the response would be?