Moderator: Community Team


Dazy, tell me do you think that the zodiac killer is a SK? Perhaps he is a friendly town vig?dazerazer wrote:Just F***** Off some of ya'll. Instead of insulting me, why don't ya'll answer the d*** questions, and actually try to move this game along.
Aint nothin a joke. Unfortunately though I only got as far as the cops did, but I'ma still be workin.
edocsil wrote: More or less sums up my thoughts on the double kill stuff. Too powerful. The SK would have a greatly increased chance of winning.
How ya know there a serial killer? Mebbe cuz ya is one?
Vote edocsil
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

I was thinking the same, lolkernov wrote:Have you tried adding the letters I,O,D,L as well ? just an ideakarelpietertje wrote:Please tell me this is a joke, dazerazer. There isn't actually a way to encrypt and/or decode text using a Zodiac mechanism that is widely known, is there? If so, explain to me how you got the E,S,C, (I suppose A,P,E are next?), or quit joking.
FoS dazerazer
I aint overreactin either. Why the hell would the zodiac be a friendly town vig??!! That made me spit my tea out. Funny as hell.edocsil wrote:
Dazy, tell me do you think that the zodiac killer is a SK? Perhaps he is a friendly town vig?

It was sarcasm. You got after me cause I assumed Mr. Z was a SK. To prove it ridiculous to assume otherwise I jokingly suggests the he could be a town vig.dazerazer wrote:Ya'll must not be readin. Edoc directly addressed me. So I be answerin his question. I aint pickin on him. But I do think he the mob. And Victor aint.
I aint overreactin either. Why the hell would the zodiac be a friendly town vig??!! That made me spit my tea out. Funny as hell.edocsil wrote:
Dazy, tell me do you think that the zodiac killer is a SK? Perhaps he is a friendly town vig?
If you be sayin somethin like that, you gunna be asked bout it. Plain and simple.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Nokarelpietertje wrote:
rofl nice avvy Sully. trying to tell us something?
It's alive!! Gotta bold bro.Mass Miracle wrote:Merry Christmas everyone! I am with Commander9....I vote Flow.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Oh, the same bad reasons as before eh? Do we really need to spend several pages re-quoting past arguments about why you are barking up the wrong tree?Commander9 wrote:Vote Flow for the same reasons as I've voted him Day 1.
I do consider my reasons more than valid and if I'll be reduced to quoting everything from the past and stating my case all over, I shall.Flow520 wrote:Oh, the same bad reasons as before eh? Do we really need to spend several pages re-quoting past arguments about why you are barking up the wrong tree?
Probably should, you are the accuser.Commander9 wrote:I do consider my reasons more than valid and if I'll be reduced to quoting everything from the past and stating my case all over, I shall.Flow520 wrote:Oh, the same bad reasons as before eh? Do we really need to spend several pages re-quoting past arguments about why you are barking up the wrong tree?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
What what do agree with me on? That commander is accusing flow? Did you mean someone else?Gabriel13 wrote:I agree Edoc. He probably is. Vote Flow
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I think he misunderstood what you've said.edocsil wrote:What what do agree with me on? That commander is accusing flow? Did you mean someone else?Gabriel13 wrote:I agree Edoc. He probably is. Vote Flow
As I've pointed as well, there are few others that I do find suspicious, but I haven't seen anyone better for lynching as flow at this moment.Commander9 wrote:You can also include his wild reaction to my joke vote and a quick defence that he put up along with the accusations. Could this have been a fateful slip? Obviously, we don't know yet, but I would be interested in what flow has to say
If one backtracks before this post to find the sequence of events leading up to this "wild reaction" (which Commander9 does not take the time or care to specify) one would find the following:Commander9 wrote:You can also include his wild reaction to my joke vote and a quick defence that he put up along with the accusations. Could this have been a fateful slip? Obviously, we don't know yet, but I would be interested in what flow has to say
Of course a brief glance at the first page reveals that no one died, so I posted:Commander9 wrote:Vote Flow.Flow520 wrote:Interesting that no one died the first night. Let me be clear, I'm very happy about it, it's that with a group of prisoners on the loose and a mafia to boot I'm just really surprised.
You already started to skim and it's just Day 1. Is that A NEW RECORD?![]()
Commander9 specifies that he was talking about NPC's and that it was obvious that no one died. I respond:Flow520 wrote:Hmmm, lets see, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Did I miss anyone? I guess not. All 18 of us in a NOT DEAD state of life...
If it is a new record for skimming, it's all yours because you looked at only the 1st D1 post instead of reading back to page one to see who was alive...
Commander9 responds:Flow520 wrote:Then I take it that you are Obviously unsurprised that no player characters died...Commander9 wrote:Obviously, the player characters are alive - that was pretty obvious as she'd have written if one would have died.
Seems odd that you would not find it odd, unless you know something...
Since this discussion several people have confirmed that usually no one dies on Night 0.Commander9 wrote:Yes, because it's Night 0 - no one ever dies in night 0 as far as I know. Sheesh.
But seriously, who like's being called a skimmer by someone who is obviously skimming whilst making their claims against you?Commander9 wrote:Vote Flow.
You already started to skim and it's just Day 1. Is that A NEW RECORD?![]()
Also, I for one would really like an accounting of all my "flipping out" and "baseless accusations" against you... It shouldn't take you long as the list is nonexistent...Commander9 wrote:I do a joke vote on him and he flips out and starts one baseless accusation after another.

Gah, what is this unvoting business, I never require it in mine. No problems, will comply.VioIet wrote:Vote Count
Victor (4): edocsil, drabod, aage, lildan
Flow (4): kernov, commander9, mass miracle, gabriel
Edocsil(1): dazey
With 16 alive it takes 8 to lynch
Special Mod Note: Even though mass didn't bold, and gabe didn't bold the whole thing, I will give them some leeway for being new. But normally the votes wouldn't count. I will simply count them to get the game moving a bit.
Also remember to unvote. Edoc, that's why some of your votes were ignored on Day 1. I figured you were experienced enough to know. And edoc wasn't the only one, there were a few others. The unvote also has to be in bold.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Your first rather interesting point - no one usually dies as latter you're told. You've been around longer than I have and yet you don't know? Surprised much?Flow520 wrote:Interesting that no one died the first night. Let me be clear, I'm very happy about it, it's that with a group of prisoners on the loose and a mafia to boot I'm just really surprised.
After a few joke votes, you suddenly get serious - and attack me with an argument of no basis.Flow520 wrote:Then I take it that you are Obviously unsurprised that no player characters died...
Seems odd that you would not find it odd, unless you know something...
Again, you've been long enough to know. If you didn't, perhaps a bit too curious for killing? Then something even more interesting pops out:Flow520 wrote:I'm just curious then, what was the point of asking us to send in Night 0 actions?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:vote lildanbaasman just cuz. Also because of Mr. Van-Damme in your avi. Which movie is that from?
Also Flow, generally Night 0 there are no deaths. It kinda defeats the purpose of joining if you don't get to post because you get a random NK on you.
-Tails
karelpietertje wrote:I actually had the same mind-messup as Flow; except I concluded myself that killings in night 0 would be mean to the killed people, and there must be liberal night actions.
After the explaining that was done, I think you should have understood it immediately.
I feel like you were a bit afraid to admit to such a little mistake, hence the playing dumb.
Also I feel like a true pro-towner wouldn't mind about that; FoS Flow
After some rather good logic from Karel, feeling under the heat really fast, you make a claim. Not a good one, but just to get enough attention of you? Furthermore, you state that you knew that intended target... How?Flow520 wrote:Truth of the matter is that I thought since no one died night 1 that I had a pretty good idea of who the mafia's intended target was.
Considering my role is much less useful to town if I get outed (especially this early on), let's leave it at that shall we.
Even though language is not perfect, Daze also raises perfectly good questions:Flow520 wrote:I'm going to have to leave it at this. To say anything more would seriously reduce town's chances of winning.Flow520 wrote:Truth of the matter is that I thought since no one died night 1 that I had a pretty good idea of who the mafia's intended target was.
Considering my role is much less useful to town if I get outed (especially this early on), let's leave it at that shall we.
Granted, I expect the mafia will come out of the woodwork and press for a lynch, and at L-1 I'll probably cave and give out more detail which will just make it easier for the scum to kill us all. But you'll probably still not believe me and I'll have the satisfaction of saying I told you so after you all lynch me. Oh well.
Then something even better comes up:dazerazer wrote:Okie dokey ya'll, this is nonsense.
Where did Flow say he was bulletproof? I read all his post and I don't see that anywhere? Where ya'll be gettin that from?
Also, ain't only Godfather's bulletproof. So ya'll saying Flow is the godfather. Yet because he's the GodFather, ya'll don't wanna to vote him. What kinda sense is that????
And FOS all those who be sayin the case against Flow is weak.
FOS Aage
FOS Edocsil
Ya'll both trying to disprove some obviously suspicious behavior from Flow.
Which means, if Flow the mob, you both the mob too.
If Flow ain't the mob, ya'll both are still the mob.
Flow Stated
He knows who the mafia intended target was
How do you know that?? Ya'll just can't be letting somethin like that slide. That's how the mob gets away. You just don't say somethin like that in a mafia game. It's somethin the mob would say.
You betta start spillin soon....
I see nothing suspicious about Jeraado. He one of the few makin sense in here!
How on Earth would you be able to safely assume about the target? People (most of them, anyways) start without knowing anyone elses roles, so that means Mafia would be picking randomly. The only way for you to be able to safely "assume" that if you're hiding something.Flow520 wrote: This does not sate that I know who the mafia intended target was. It states that, based on my assumption that a group of prisoners and mafia were on the loose N0, that if they had failed in their N0 NK, then and only then would I have a good idea of who the intended target may have been.
Wait, wait, wait - let me get this straight: you are saying that just because more experienced agree with you there's no case? What if (*surprise* *surprise*) they would be aligned with you and it would make sense for them to defend you?Flow520 wrote: By this logic if you lynch me you will find that I am town, and the "We" that you are refering to as collaborating would also likely be town. Conversely the "obvious" pair of you and Kernov will appear decidedly not town for pressing so hard for the lynch when more experienced players are screaming at you that I'm not scum. Go ahead, dig your own graves... Regardless of if you and Kernov are town or scum, your arguments are just going to get you lynched, and rather quickly...
Well, usually one probably would expect more reasoning than you've just put here.Your behaviour hasn't been all that well either - lots of posting, not a lot of content. You wanted a quick lynch Day 1 and you're doing the same again. Scummaring?JudahsLion wrote:VOTE FLOW for being a sneaky snake.
What? Why would he assume that he was a target? Doesn't make any sense?aage wrote: I think you will agree with me that in this case Flow is assuming that if the mafia had a NK during night 0, he himself was the target (since he is bulletproof...), otherwise there would be no reason to have an idea on who the target would have been. Except if he were the mafia himself, in which case he's an idiot and should've PM'd VioIet. Since I don't like to think people are idiots before having evidence for it I stay with my first theory.