Moderator: Community Team
hesa twelv yer old pleas repset taht.ga7 wrote:Well, amongst the submariners we have pretty good general candidates for a day 1 lynch: xeureb & 40k guy.
Seeing as 40k guy seems one of these guys that post a lot elsewhere but forgets this because he's a 4 year old on crack, I'll go with him.
Unvote Vote 40k
aage wrote:hesa twelv yer old pleas repset taht.ga7 wrote:Well, amongst the submariners we have pretty good general candidates for a day 1 lynch: xeureb & 40k guy.
Seeing as 40k guy seems one of these guys that post a lot elsewhere but forgets this because he's a 4 year old on crack, I'll go with him.
Unvote Vote 40k
Anyway, I think there are 4? or 3? votes on 40k now. Why? Besides him being on crack?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
No, not really. It's day 1 and I usually like to end day 1 with some information where we could look back, if needed. I wanted things to get more serious, but this is pretty much exactly what I've wanted to avoid - a quick, mindless lynch. Deadline would have forced that, but now we are. I don't mind pressuring and seeing where it will lead us, but lynching him without even letting him speak is madness and extremely scummy.Anarkistsdream wrote:If he is voted right now, then whoever has voted him will be suspect next. However, not voting him makes everyone else guilty if he comes up scum....
Hmmmmm
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I agree, but this is different. One is a quick lynch and replacement is something completely different.Anarkistsdream wrote:Well I'm OK with giving him through today, but he is in several games, and he should be posting. If he doesn't, then he needs to be prodded, replaced, or lynched.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Dude, you've put him rather close to lynch when the mod had said that if needed, he will replace. Your vote was totally unnecessary... Same with your reaction.Clive wrote:So i'm seriously being wagoned for that? f*ck you all.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
No, but you've created a BW... He was in no danger as of then, but what I really disliked was the intention of yours. Things sometimes turn hectic really fast.Clive wrote:L-3 my god, watch out the scum are ready to pounce and speed lynch!
Wait, apparently i'm one of them, too. Hmm. :/
Even if nobody speed hammers, putting somebody at L-1 for not having shown up is a bit overagressive. Pretty much every additional vote on a player ought to require even more rationale for voting the person. I definitely don't like bw'ing you here, and I don't think that's happening, but I'm I'm happy with giving 40kguy until Friday to speak up.Clive wrote:L-3 my god, watch out the scum are ready to pounce and speed lynch!
Wait, apparently i'm one of them, too. Hmm. :/
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
It was L-3, if I'm not mistaken.spurgistan wrote:Even if nobody speed hammers, putting somebody at L-1 for not having shown up is a bit overagressive. Pretty much every additional vote on a player ought to require even more rationale for voting the person. I definitely don't like bw'ing you here, and I don't think that's happening, but I'm I'm happy with giving 40kguy until Friday to speak up.
Where have I said that? The main reason I didn't like it is that the host has already stated that he will either appear or will be replaced, so I honestly don't see any reason to do what you did. If he's off and away, putting him under bigger pressure won't work whereas if a replacement comes in, we give him a fresh start, because 40k hasn't do anything, but not respond.Clive wrote:Commander, you think that the first person who's trying to make something happen in dead game is mafia?
Dude the wagon was already started since long, and IMO in this kind of games with a fair bit of inactives that could make the game like shit it is better to just lynch someone who will not participate and is a complete noob anyway. The fact you guys defend him could bring a pretty good surprise at the end of the day, so statistics are also for this lynch. I completely agree with Nark there, I do miss the fast paced games that didn't need 2 freaking weeks to conclude a day, and this game was off a very very bad start. Get it done now, make real cases later.Commander9 wrote:No, but you've created a BW...Clive wrote:L-3 my god, watch out the scum are ready to pounce and speed lynch!
Wait, apparently i'm one of them, too. Hmm. :/
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Excuse me, I heard otherwise, and I didn't check because I'm a lazy person. FOS whoever made me out to be an idiot... wait that's me. Dammit.Commander9 wrote:It was L-3, if I'm not mistaken.spurgistan wrote:Even if nobody speed hammers, putting somebody at L-1 for not having shown up is a bit overagressive. Pretty much every additional vote on a player ought to require even more rationale for voting the person. I definitely don't like bw'ing you here, and I don't think that's happening, but I'm I'm happy with giving 40kguy until Friday to speak up.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
I guess we like a bit different games then, because I usually try to get the best possibly lynch before moving on instead of just breezing through. Each to his own.ga7 wrote:Dude the wagon was already started since long, and IMO in this kind of games with a fair bit of inactives that could make the game like shit it is better to just lynch someone who will not participate and is a complete noob anyway. The fact you guys defend him could bring a pretty good surprise at the end of the day, so statistics are also for this lynch. I completely agree with Nark there, I do miss the fast paced games that didn't need 2 freaking weeks to conclude a day, and this game was off a very very bad start. Get it done now, make real cases later.
Commander9 wrote:I guess we like a bit different games then, because I usually try to get the best possibly lynch before moving on instead of just breezing through. Each to his own.ga7 wrote:Dude the wagon was already started since long, and IMO in this kind of games with a fair bit of inactives that could make the game like shit it is better to just lynch someone who will not participate and is a complete noob anyway. The fact you guys defend him could bring a pretty good surprise at the end of the day, so statistics are also for this lynch. I completely agree with Nark there, I do miss the fast paced games that didn't need 2 freaking weeks to conclude a day, and this game was off a very very bad start. Get it done now, make real cases later.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
