sure I can always change them. but I have it set where all the other maps look good to me...and this one doesnt. its just an opinion.Perhaps your contrast or brightness on your monitor needs to be adjusted?
Moderator: Cartographers
sure I can always change them. but I have it set where all the other maps look good to me...and this one doesnt. its just an opinion.Perhaps your contrast or brightness on your monitor needs to be adjusted?
awesome, was just making sure. looks great!mibi wrote:The XML will readneoni wrote:the territory names need changed, even if it's just something like the king of the hill map (a1, a2, b1 etc), because at the moment it will get very confusing
Player attacks Plains 1 from Swamp 1
Pllayer attacks Midlands 5 from Forest 2
Player deploys 3 armies on East Ward 4
Player deploys 3 armies on the Throne
Player fortified Outer Wall 1 from Plains 3
Player fortified Tunnel 1 from Great Hall 5
I dont think it will be confusing at all.
both those photos are in the wrong perspective for this map, and we wouldn't want to mix perspectives. also the plains is much too close. I have changed all the textures more than once and think they are fine at the moment. that seems to be the consensus.Wisse wrote:i like the forest so mayby you can use this pics:
the swamp: http://www.phonk.net/Images/Camargue/99 ... margue.jpg
the plains: http://www.beteredingen.nl/pivot/images ... anveld.jpg
Changes:AndyDufresne wrote:Well lets see, I've been watching the creation of this map, and it's been interesting!
I wish I had more time, so for now I'll comment on a few random things, in no particular order other than my thought process:
The black line surrounding the Gate Bridge seems slightly out of place, probably due to its crispness. Nothing else in the map feels like that.
The Throne is a little pixely, compared the to softness of the rest of the map.
I've a minor concern about being able to distinguish the colors for the various wooded/swamp/midlands areas in the legend. But maybe I just need to look at it a little more, and get a better feel for it all!
I love the general feel you have going, especially in the Castle, in the plains, and the river area. Plains is pretty nice also. Visually speaking, comparing it to the rest, the Tunnel and the Swamp and the Wooded areas seem a little off kilter.
I also love the use of other shaped army shadows, fun and makes sense for the map. Eventually we'll work on making those all centered the best we can.
I'll be back to comment further.
--Andy

woods camp is in the log wall... its a bit darker than the forest but its really the only thing on the map that could be the woods camp.KEYOGI wrote:I really like the new perspective. I'm glad you decided to give it a try, the poll suggests it was worth the effort.![]()
I have a couple of minor concerns. One being the difficulty in distinguishing between continents. I find it next to impossible to seperate Forest from Wood Camp. At first glance, the same applies to the East and West Ward. You've also left behind some of your brown tiles texture in West Ward... the corner of 1.
I'm not sure the new perspective is doing your tent any favours. Would it maybe look better with some sort of gradient to try and add depth?
Keep up the good work.
KEYOGI wrote:I understand that, others may not though. The contrast you had previous to the perspective changes was good.mibi wrote:woods camp is in the log wall... its a bit darker than the forest but its really the only thing on the map that could be the woods camp.
How many territories do you have?
1. They needn't have country names like "Eryndithl", just descriptive names like "North Camp" or "Swamp Landing" or "Deep Forest" or things like that.mibi wrote:sorry, names will not work for two reasonsspinwizard wrote:cant we have better names tho...i will think of some 4 u if u want!
1. the territories are much smaller than traditional countries, making a name like "Eryndithl" for an area the size of my back yard quite ridiculous.
2. There is not enough space, especially in the fortress, for area names.
EvilOtto wrote:1. They needn't have country names like "Eryndithl", just descriptive names like "North Camp" or "Swamp Landing" or "Deep Forest" or things like that.mibi wrote:sorry, names will not work for two reasonsspinwizard wrote:cant we have better names tho...i will think of some 4 u if u want!
1. the territories are much smaller than traditional countries, making a name like "Eryndithl" for an area the size of my back yard quite ridiculous.
2. There is not enough space, especially in the fortress, for area names.
2. Then have short number/letter labels inside the fortress and longer names outside. Mixing it up will make it much easier to find things and use the game menus without making mistakes. There is a lot of unused space around the fortress though, I think names could work there too (the name doesn't have to fit entirely inside the territory borders!)
Let's hear some more excuses!
that would make things cluttered, espeically in the fortress and ESPECIALLY on the small version of the map.
Ot could work outside the fortress but it might get redundant, coming up with 7 different ways to label "plains"
Love the army shadows!
