Moderator: Community Team
Yes, sorry. DIdn't know if you were already aware of that.capanache wrote:well that was obvious but thank thank you none the less. I felt weird writing strategy right on the chat, but I'm sure I will get used to it.
Something like this is being suggested right now. However, I personally favor no limit to stacking.keblecol wrote:Have we ever considered some sort of resource cap feature? Where territories can only sustain a certain amount of troops before there is a loss due to lack of resources? Kind of like the Napoleon map variant in Russia but applicable to any game. I'll admit it would hinder the stacking strategy a bit.
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Antarctica almost entirely consists of territories where you loose 1 troop a turn on a stack. So leaving 1’s (which cannot loose troops) is the best, and stacking means you actually loos troops..keblecol wrote:Have we ever considered some sort of resource cap feature? Where territories can only sustain a certain amount of troops before there is a loss due to lack of resources? Kind of like the Napoleon map variant in Russia but applicable to any game. I'll admit it would hinder the stacking strategy a bit.