Conquer Club

Petition For Dugcarr1 Back. Sign Up and Stick It To the Man

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Postby mandalorian2298 on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:00 am

wicked wrote:wicked's already done that, and can do it no longer with the guidelines now in place. sorry! :lol:


:cry: Then why did spammers agree to the.... :shock: OMG I hope they don't intend to make AK wear a nude avi! :-s
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Postby podge on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:20 am

ClessAlvein wrote:The biggest mistake is that y'all seem to think that a premium account is a paid-for service. It isn't. It's a paid-for privilege, and those can be revoked, with or without notice, as it says nicely in the rules, by the owner of this site.

The moment you Paypal that $20 to Conquest Club, it's gone. If you don't get what you want, you can complain about it, but it won't do you any good. Unlike Ebay or AOL, Conquest Club is not dealing in material goods, is not dealing in services in the legal sense of the word, is not a company, and, in fact, can be selling you hocus-pocus rings that claim to make you live forever and still won't get into any trouble. The most that will happen is that the site will be known for a scam and people will stop falling for it, enough so that the owner is forced to shut it down or lose money for keeping it up.

There should be no concern about "putting power in the hands of a few" because all the power is in lackattack's hands to begin with. Who owns the domain name? Who pays for the servers and all its upgrades? Who spends countless hours scripting the game and patrolling the forums?

The guy's making a living off of this, so he's interested in keeping it an enjoyable experience for everyone. It doesn't say anywhere that he has to be nice about it, or that he has to allow community input at all. He could be making more money by splaying a few ads and totally ignoring the community. He doesn't even have to have a forum! He has these features, however, because he seems to genuinely care about the well-being of the core community, and not only for the profit margin. And indirectly, he's also getting stuff back, in the form of regulars, new maps, and a volunteer staff - things he could not accomplish by being indifferent.


Nice post considering that you don't know what the site is called
User avatar
Sergeant podge
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:05 pm

Postby ClessAlvein on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:36 am

Good catch, but I hope you got the point of the post instead of just nitpicking for typos. In my defense... it's late.
Major ClessAlvein
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:30 pm

Postby reverend_kyle on Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:00 am

I love how this thread is like "stick it to the man". Right there that says that its not justice its just because the creator likes to disagree and not think for himself.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby GrazingCattle on Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:03 pm

tahitiwahini wrote:Well, I'm a civic-minded kinda guy, so what the hell, of course I'll sign the petition.

But somehow I feel I should be doing more...

What else can I do to promote cheating?

In other words, what else should I be doing to ensure the complete destruction of CC?

Granted, bringing back Dug would be a good first step, but surely there must be some other way I can help in this worthwhile cause.

I join in your outrage that the site mods have not stood idly by and watched everything they've worked for be perverted before their eyes.

I fear what CC will turn into without Dug as a role model.

Where will the innovative ideas that keep this an exciting site come from now?

Bribe a player to throw a game. Organize a series of fraudulent games to give points away to his friends.

These are ideas worthy of a genius. I worry that without Dug here, these innovations might never have seen the light of day...

... and we would all be the poorer for that.

Un-ban Dug immediately; a mind is a terrible thing to waste!!!!



I love these posts. These are the reason I keep reading the dug posts!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby Fireside Poet on Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:11 pm

GrazingCattle wrote:
tahitiwahini wrote:Well, I'm a civic-minded kinda guy, so what the hell, of course I'll sign the petition.

But somehow I feel I should be doing more...

What else can I do to promote cheating?

In other words, what else should I be doing to ensure the complete destruction of CC?

Granted, bringing back Dug would be a good first step, but surely there must be some other way I can help in this worthwhile cause.

I join in your outrage that the site mods have not stood idly by and watched everything they've worked for be perverted before their eyes.

I fear what CC will turn into without Dug as a role model.

Where will the innovative ideas that keep this an exciting site come from now?

Bribe a player to throw a game. Organize a series of fraudulent games to give points away to his friends.

These are ideas worthy of a genius. I worry that without Dug here, these innovations might never have seen the light of day...

... and we would all be the poorer for that.

Un-ban Dug immediately; a mind is a terrible thing to waste!!!!



I love these posts. These are the reason I keep reading the dug posts!


Personally, I think the unbanning of Dug would not cause enough damage, but the immediate upgrade to MOD would complete the job much better. In the age of "all is forgiven and here's a lollipop too" to proven cheaters (CC criminals, if you don't mind), it would only be RIGHT for lackattack to commit CC into the hands of the local anarchist heirarchy (see hendy for example) out of complete goodwill and to show that he has a heart of compassion and is willing to give the benefit of the doubt to those that so rightfully deserve to be pardoned... even if they NEVER ask to be forgiven. :P Punishment for wrong is so outdated.
Image
Click this logo for more information on joining!
User avatar
Major Fireside Poet
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:49 pm

Holla'

Postby cleveridea on Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:29 pm

what,me worry? wrote:...please accept this as my resignation.


Are you simulcasting this in your high school newspaper? Holla'
Corporal 1st Class cleveridea
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:46 pm

Postby cleveridea on Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:36 pm

Sammy gags wrote:I love RISK, but I do not like restrictions on gameplay


Don't like restrictions? Then go to f'ing Wal-Mart, buy a shiny new Risk box, set up the pieces and let it fly however you like.

Hmmmm. Isn't very enjoyable gaming without any restrictions, is it?

It's absolute ignorance like yours about social truths and fair play that is what is wrong with a great many on this site.
Corporal 1st Class cleveridea
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:46 pm

Postby GrazingCattle on Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:38 pm

Fireside Poet wrote:
GrazingCattle wrote:
tahitiwahini wrote:Well, I'm a civic-minded kinda guy, so what the hell, of course I'll sign the petition.

But somehow I feel I should be doing more...

What else can I do to promote cheating?

In other words, what else should I be doing to ensure the complete destruction of CC?

Granted, bringing back Dug would be a good first step, but surely there must be some other way I can help in this worthwhile cause.

I join in your outrage that the site mods have not stood idly by and watched everything they've worked for be perverted before their eyes.

I fear what CC will turn into without Dug as a role model.

Where will the innovative ideas that keep this an exciting site come from now?

Bribe a player to throw a game. Organize a series of fraudulent games to give points away to his friends.

These are ideas worthy of a genius. I worry that without Dug here, these innovations might never have seen the light of day...

... and we would all be the poorer for that.

Un-ban Dug immediately; a mind is a terrible thing to waste!!!!



I love these posts. These are the reason I keep reading the dug posts!


Personally, I think the unbanning of Dug would not cause enough damage, but the immediate upgrade to MOD would complete the job much better. In the age of "all is forgiven and here's a lollipop too" to proven cheaters (CC criminals, if you don't mind), it would only be RIGHT for lackattack to commit CC into the hands of the local anarchist heirarchy (see hendy for example) out of complete goodwill and to show that he has a heart of compassion and is willing to give the benefit of the doubt to those that so rightfully deserve to be pardoned... even if they NEVER ask to be forgiven. :P Punishment for wrong is so outdated.



:D Is this where I put my vote for Dug to become the new web master?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby oVo on Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:23 pm

All this whiney bullshit is over a 4 month ban because an idiot did something really stupid and got busted for it?
Give me a fucking break, dugcarr is fortunate to not be exiled permanently. If what, me worry? is so upset about the actions taken by this site against dug I recommend a boycott or better yet, protest by holding your breath until he is reinstated. You won't be missed and this community will be fine without you.

w,mw? and dug should take all the time and money invested in Conquer Club and start their own gamesite were members can cheat and be as subversive as they want. Anarchy.com is probably taken so maybe Gump.com will have to do, since stupid is as stupid does.


don't go away mad, just go away
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Postby Sammy gags on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:14 pm

I love how everybody thinks they know what they are talking about but they really don't
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Sammy gags
 
Posts: 1642
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 6:26 pm
Location: ?????

Postby Molacole on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:19 pm

oVo wrote:All this whiney bullshit is over a 4 month ban because an idiot did something really stupid and got busted for it?
Give me a fucking break, dugcarr is fortunate to not be exiled permanently. If what, me worry? is so upset about the actions taken by this site against dug I recommend a boycott or better yet, protest by holding your breath until he is reinstated. You won't be missed and this community will be fine without you.

w,mw? and dug should take all the time and money invested in Conquer Club and start their own gamesite were members can cheat and be as subversive as they want. Anarchy.com is probably taken so maybe Gump.com will have to do, since stupid is as stupid does.


don't go away mad, just go away


dude you have 19 games go read the FAQ's...

tahitiwahini:

You can't refute that what Dug did was wrong.
never tried to. I was simply stating that I didn't agree with his punishment...
Your reasoning is bizarre: Dug didn't like the scoring system so it justified everything he did.
never said it was justified, just that I personally understood what could motivate him to do this...
Dug wanted to play Blitz, but Blitz didn't want to play Dug. Well guess what happens in that situation: they don't play, it's really that simple.
yes to you it may seem so, but in all actuality it becomes more complex when you insert a ranking system...
You seem to think that Dug had a right to play anyone he wanted to. That's simply not the way it works. He didn't have that right. I don't have that right. You don't have that right. No one on the site has that right. I think that's what's known as freedom of association. At this site we aren't forced to associate with anyone we don't want to, we aren't forced to play with anyone we don't want to.
this logic completely nullifies the point of having ranks... a substitute for your logic would be a win loss record instead.
I know you're not much on argumentation, but would you care to take a shot by explaining what Blitz has done to violate any rules? I'll make it even easier for you: would you care to explain what Blitz has done that is remotely unsportsmanlike. The very worst things I've ever heard anyone accuse Blitz of is being proud of his score ranking, seeking recognition for his accomplishment, and wanting people to like him. Exactly how does this harm anyone else on this site?
when did I say he violated any rules? I could have, but I don't remember saying that... The only things that would or could make me think less of blitz is how he avoids playing people who call him out and fishes for feedback. Although I don't blame him one bit for avoiding standard games with people who call him out.
You have the freedom of speech to say anything you want to. You can say black is white. I have the right to laugh at your saying that. And since I have the same freedom of speech that you enjoy, I have the right to challenge your statement. I've just exercised my right.
I like to exercise by swimming in a pool. Salt water isn't really my thing plus the beaches are just too cold where I live...



Nobody is saying dug shouldn't be punished (or atleast not me). I just think the punishment was extremely harsh. I'm having trouble seeing the (very fine) line of right and wrong. Create a multi and you get a slap on the wrist (mutis can destroy the point system especially over a perdiod of time, just ask medalofhonor lol). Dug was messing with the points system and trying to sabotage a certain individual which is pretty twisted, but to me, understandable considering that certain person can't stop boasting about their rank... Bragging about your rank at any chance you get and then refusing to play people who share your rank is like instigating trouble.

No it wasn't right what dug did, but I don't feel the 4 month isolation ban given to him was either... They could've banned him for like 2 weeks no CC and I would've laughed at him. 4 months of no interaction with the community is like egging him on to escilate the problem especially considering everyone knows the role he plays on this website.
User avatar
Lieutenant Molacole
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:19 am
Location: W 2.0 map by ZIM

Postby poo-maker on Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:45 pm

is dug banned from the whole site for 4 months? seems a little harsh, a couple days would have been better.
Brigadier poo-maker
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:58 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Postby Kayla on Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:34 pm

sign me up :D ... there are some ridiculous things the mods have done, andy lack and wicked knows exactly what im talking about.... I dont really get on much anymore, i have been up to 112 games at a time, and use to play and be very active in forums, now it just seems the mods dont do their job. not to mention a lot of people on this site seem to be gods at turning a pleasant conversation into something that should be moved to flame wars. People arent themself on here mostly. One person, I wont say who, told me on yahoo to ignore all the flame bs they put up in the flame wars, because thats not really them, they are just being an ass. Ppl just seem to get some high off pissin ppl off on purpose, yes i know, jamie is one of them. but a lot of ppl are. Ive mostly lost interest in the forums, and i barely play games anymore, i havent had one open for a week or two, ive played only a couple games in the past month. only reason i know about the dug thing is jamie told me this morning before i went to class and im just now checking it out, id have to agree most of this site is unenjoyable and i dont care if this gets me flamed 2 months straight again, til ppl finally give up and grow up. and seems the "higher powered" (regular players) meaning ones that are high ranked and leaders of clans and stuff like this, get more, when they paid just as much as i did. theres a clue for what im talking about from what i said earlier about wicked and andy knowin what i am talking about.
User avatar
Major Kayla
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:43 am
Location: Sedalia Missouri

Re: Holla'

Postby what,me worry? on Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:37 pm

cleveridea wrote:
what,me worry? wrote:...please accept this as my resignation.


Are you simulcasting this in your high school newspaper? Holla'


Ouch! good one! you got me there....... :roll:

reverend_kyle wrote:I love how this thread is like "stick it to the man". Right there that says that its not justice its just because the creator likes to disagree and not think for himself.


Hey rev. BTW, I like your quote from Hendy. But honestly, I would have to say that this one is a tiny bit better......

what,me worry? wrote:the only thing im jealous about rev, is that Hendy gets to refill your moms water bowl instead of me.
User avatar
Private 1st Class what,me worry?
 
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Bay area, California

Postby Sammy gags on Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:49 pm

2007-03-31 17:40:46 - dugcarr1: I can show u my credit card recipet if u guys "ACCIDENTLY" erased those records like u clam u "ACCIDENTLY" erased 50 of my games
2007-03-31 17:41:20 - dugcarr1: AND IM STILL WAITING ON AT LEAST 1 EMAIL EXPLAINING YOUR ACTIONS
2007-03-31 17:41:32 - dugcarr1: no one has told me shit
2007-03-31 18:05:49 - wicked: 1. I didn't delete your games, lack did, and he explained why, and why your account was cancelled in the forums.
2007-03-31 18:07:56 - wicked: 2. refunds are not given when accounts are banned, and memberships are not transferrable
2007-03-31 18:15:02 - wicked: 3. you asked for a refund first
2007-03-31 22:43:47 - dugcarr1: LACK says,,, page 23 on ban dug........"""" accidentally deleted a few good games because I punched in the wrong game numbers. Ooops """
2007-03-31 22:44:14 - dugcarr1: sure u did,,, real nice explanation
2007-03-31 22:46:06 - dugcarr1: kinda funny ,,,, first time in over 40,000 games,,,,,, OOOPS eh? nice show you guys are running here,, still waiting on that apoiligy and a transfer and an explanation of why i was cancelled because of words. there were NO secret allainces EVER!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-31 22:47:22 - dugcarr1: give my 30$ to charity then ,, i dont give a shit theres no way u guys should keep it, i dont care about the $$$ just the princible here
2007-03-31 22:48:47 - dugcarr1: and u call me a greiver ,, out to do most damage to this site eh,,,,,, i could show u guys what im capable if youd like,,,, guess since u guys said that shit about me it couldnt hurt me to acually practice it then.
2007-03-31 22:49:27 - dugcarr1: i give u 24 hours post this and respond
2007-04-01 01:25:42 - dugcarr1: someone tell tinniweanni to quit fucking putting BULLshit lies in qotes and saying i said that. and tell him to FUCKING PROVE IT,,,,,
2007-04-01 01:26:52 - dugcarr1: NEVER ONCE did i EVER tell ant one of me "FRIENDS" here or anyone any secret plans,,,,,,THERE WAS NO SECRET ALLIANCE EVER!
2007-04-01 01:29:07 - dugcarr1: only rules u claim i broke "Any form of collusion between opponents must be announced beforehand in the game chat,"
2007-04-01 01:29:28 - dugcarr1: there was no COLLUSION BETWEEN 2 players!
2007-04-01 01:30:05 - dugcarr1: there was me TALKING only, so
2007-04-01 01:30:10 - dugcarr1: 1) NO COLLUTION
2007-04-01 01:30:23 - dugcarr1: 2) NO MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS
2007-04-01 01:31:10 - dugcarr1: your only 2 rules,, and i didnt break them.........PROVE IT,,, sighting specific examples
2007-04-01 05:47:40 - wicked: if you have a complaint, please contact the admin via the contact page
2007-04-01 14:21:48 - dugcarr1: I CANOT CONTACT ANYONE AND WAS GIVIN NO EXPLAINATION OR EMAIL OR PM
2007-04-01 14:22:44 - dugcarr1: and master bush, i saw your picture and realizr your only around16 years old, but dont call me a coward, please.
2007-04-01 14:23:44 - dugcarr1: I was only 1 of the poeple arounf here to stand up for himself and my rights
2007-04-01 14:24:47 - dugcarr1: and one of the only high ranking player not to be agogant , or a snob or blow smoke up the mods asses and always exept a challange to ANY ONE beacuse i loved the game of RISK
2007-04-01 14:25:39 - dugcarr1: i emailed CC 5 days ago and was not emailed back a explanation
2007-04-01 14:26:33 - dugcarr1: and for those of u who cant see what im trying to do for it then thats to bad, maybe realy look at the big picture
2007-04-01 14:28:08 - dugcarr1: and by listining to the mods, im sure there mostly a bunch of live at home with there parents no life i can read forums all day tipe of people
2007-04-01 14:28:34 - dugcarr1: is this who u guys really want running YOUR SITE
2007-04-01 14:29:07 - dugcarr1: YES YOUR SITE ,,, not lacks or the mods or any other douch bag,, your all payed for a piece of this ITS YOURS.
2007-04-01 14:29:39 - dugcarr1: dont bend over so easy and bow down, and be afriad to ask for a change in a obvoiusly broken system.
2007-04-01 14:30:51 - dugcarr1: demand it fixed! dont let these lasy 20$ collecting COMMIES get away with being this lasy and selfish, ITS ALL YOUR PEOPLES SITE TO GOD DAMIT STAND UP FOR YOUR SELFS
2007-04-01 14:32:19 - dugcarr1: and for the record, i said give my 30% to charity or to another player here, dont give me non trasferable BS. its a click of the mouse for LACK smartin up and start explaining yourself
2007-04-01 16:18:05 - dugcarr1: nice english, i think lack is trying to say f*ck u guy this is my site and i can change launguge if i want
2007-04-01 16:18:29 - dugcarr1: or he just pissed off the wrong person with some computer skills
2007-04-01 21:15:30 - dugcarr1: You guys are under the false impression that the scoreboard shows you who the best player is. The "best" players here have nothing to do with points. The scoreboard shows who has accumulated the most points, in order, nothing else. Doesn't rank who's "bes
2007-04-01 21:16:25 - dugcarr1: T" says wicked
2007-04-01 21:17:45 - dugcarr1: most inteigent shit u have ever fucking said,,,, stick to the facts like that and u may just about prove yourself usful around this place
2007-04-02 04:46:51 - wicked: I'm not hung up on points like you are dug. the best players are the ones I enjoy playing with, not b/c they win but b/c of how they act.
2007-04-03 16:07:41 - dugcarr1: and what is this secret allaince talk,,,, THERE WERE NO SECRETS with me not winning games tinnywinny u f*ck,,, keep using big words and trying to pass of your opion as facts NO SECRET Allince
2007-04-03 16:08:31 - dugcarr1: i started and join about 120 games woth the intention of not winning as i posted about a bunch before my right to speach was taken from me, then i acted.
2007-04-03 16:10:06 - dugcarr1: i only joined subject couple of games to speak with him because i had no other method, if i wanted someone i know to have all my points i would just played with them u gimp. not a few games with them and over 100 with strangers, with all your fancey
2007-04-03 16:11:20 - dugcarr1: writting skill u think you know not to outright tell a lie and pass it off as fact, why dont u use your head for a minute on FACTS not outright lies please
2007-04-03 21:14:12 - dugcarr1: just so the people in forums know,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2007-04-03 21:15:22 - dugcarr1: I pm ed captin killroy and OFFERED him a 20 membership to give me his password as so i could play blitz,
2007-04-03 21:16:24 - dugcarr1: no $$$ changed hands, or passwords were givin or recived, or were there any allainces or multi accounts.
2007-04-03 21:17:30 - dugcarr1: but the mods of the site with all there maturatedy and wisdom (avarage age of a mod is 18) banned me for comincating with anyone here for 4 moths,,, NO FORUMS OR PMs
2007-04-03 21:18:45 - dugcarr1: they never sent me an email or anything explaining there actions, and i didnt even break any of there rules, i have emailed them on few acations asking nicely about there actions but no reason was givin
2007-04-03 21:20:26 - dugcarr1: then for a few diffenet reasons (under protest) i anounced just before they instituted there "punishment" for me NOT breaking any rules I anounced i would be giving away all my points ( I WAS 3rd place in this usless score system)
2007-04-03 21:21:25 - dugcarr1: then i started over 100 games with the porpose of losing them all.
2007-04-03 21:22:34 - dugcarr1: a few of my online buds were trying to comunicate with me , but as the mods took away my write free speach or speach at all.
2007-04-03 21:23:30 - dugcarr1: I decided to join a few (dont know the # but less then 10) games they had going, for the sole purpose of talking to them, as i had no other way
2007-04-03 21:24:07 - dugcarr1: then they erased about 60 or so of games, half of wich were on round 3 or higher.
2007-04-03 21:25:00 - dugcarr1: wicked and lack said it was an accident if u (read forum) then they cancelled my acount .
2007-04-03 21:25:37 - dugcarr1: I had 1 year membership givin to me as gift from another player and i had paid for 1 my self.
2007-04-03 21:25:59 - dugcarr1: so i had just over 1 and a half years left.
2007-04-03 21:27:10 - dugcarr1: i wanted a refund or my remaining member ship to go to someone i know here, or givin to a charity,,,,,they have decided to keep it for them selves.
2007-04-03 21:28:34 - dugcarr1: if you anyone has any integant questions for me feel free to ask me in 1 of the few games i have going, (that they didnt "accidently erase")
2007-04-03 21:29:14 - dugcarr1: i am still waiting for at least an email explaining there actions or an explanation on which of there 2 rules i broke.
2007-04-03 21:30:44 - dugcarr1: i plead all of u reading this to think twice about paying for a membership were they will deny u a right to speak and cancell your PAYING membership with u breaking ant rules or them giving u an explaination
2007-04-03 21:31:06 - dugcarr1: THERE WAS NO SECERT ALLAINCES I HAD!!! EVER!
2007-04-03 21:31:27 - dugcarr1: THERE WAS NEVER A MULTI ACCOUNT!!!! EVER!
2007-04-03 21:31:48 - dugcarr1: only peoples fucked up opinions and lies.
2007-04-03 21:32:45 - dugcarr1: alot of what i did was about making a statment, and about the broken point system and how i can be easily manipulated
2007-04-03 21:34:31 - dugcarr1: it wasnt to much about blitz,,, he just happenen to be my poster boy because he was in 1st place , a pompuse ass, constantly pm ing people and asking them to post on his behalf against me (see threds and ask his pals about it)
2007-04-03 21:35:27 - dugcarr1: and he would pick low ranking players score under 700 to be his lackys in doubles and triples games so he would acumulate more points (which he admits)
2007-04-03 21:36:24 - dugcarr1: he also lied to me when i asked to play him (I was in 3rd he was 1st) on several ocations about why he couldnt play me.
2007-04-03 21:37:12 - dugcarr1: then he blocks me when i called him on it and left me negitve feedback (revenge) in a game we played 4 months prior,,,, before i new him
2007-04-03 21:38:23 - dugcarr1: never deleted ,,, probley cause he plays in the snob club with the mods using password well making fun of newer people..... ive been in a few of those games and didnt like them much cause they thought they were better then evry one else
2007-04-03 21:39:42 - dugcarr1: so ill keep letting you guys come to own conclutions about why i did what i did,,, few of u have been right , and ALOT have been wrong,,, but most have been LIEING arogant illinformed ass pirates
2007-04-03 21:40:35 - dugcarr1: like i said , if u want to know the truth write to me in 1 of my games before there are all gone and i disapare.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Sammy gags
 
Posts: 1642
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 6:26 pm
Location: ?????

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:14 pm

Hey sammy, try not to spam all these topics with the same post. :)


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Holla'

Postby reverend_kyle on Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:35 am

what,me worry? wrote:
cleveridea wrote:
what,me worry? wrote:...please accept this as my resignation.


Are you simulcasting this in your high school newspaper? Holla'


Ouch! good one! you got me there....... :roll:

reverend_kyle wrote:I love how this thread is like "stick it to the man". Right there that says that its not justice its just because the creator likes to disagree and not think for himself.


Hey rev. BTW, I like your quote from Hendy. But honestly, I would have to say that this one is a tiny bit better......

what,me worry? wrote:the only thing im jealous about rev, is that Hendy gets to refill your moms water bowl instead of me.



Flame wars>>

*silently cheers that elmos war legion is leaving over this*
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby freyme on Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:24 am

All of these statements about if you paid it is partly your site. That is crap. You don't go pay to watch a movie and the movie theater becomes partly yours. You are not buying stock. You are paying for the right to play unlimited games amongst other things. We are paying for a service, a gaming site where we may come to play games. If you want part ownership when you pay for something, go buy stocks or other objects.

The creator and OWNER of the site has final say. Good business strategy would say a business owner should listen and respond appropriately to his clientelle. Not every suggestion has to be heeded.

I am not on either side as I have never played with Dug or had a beef with any Mods. Just giving my 2 cents because I am tired of reading how people paid and because of that they think they partly own the site. Everywhere you go you pay for some service or another but it does not mean you own it. Give suggestions, be polite, and hopefully if the suggestion is worthwhile, it will be considered.
User avatar
Captain freyme
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: Parker, Colorado

Postby Smurf75 on Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:34 am

WMW do you have a list for those who dont want to leave cc because of this? Sign me up on the list where the ones thinking lackattack and his mods make an excellent job. The list for those who couldnt care less if someone who try and make a point by destroying the system gets banned, thats the list I wanna put my name on.

I guess you wont set up such a list though, would probably be too much to handle :lol:
--3 apples high--
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Smurf75
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:28 am
Location: Aaland Islands

Postby DavSav on Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:54 am

Molacole wrote:
You seem to think that Dug had a right to play anyone he wanted to. That's simply not the way it works. He didn't have that right. I don't have that right. You don't have that right. No one on the site has that right. I think that's what's known as freedom of association. At this site we aren't forced to associate with anyone we don't want to, we aren't forced to play with anyone we don't want to.
this logic completely nullifies the point of having ranks... a substitute for your logic would be a win loss record instead.


Well, you all seam to believe Dug did not do the same. My guess is he had 10 times as many on his ignore list. I suspect he was very much afraid of losing points. He put players that he was afraid to lose against on ignore list. My guess is that Blitz put dug on ignore list because he was (to be nice) not a pleasant guy.
Wrong? You mean like........morally?
Luck is rewarded in the short term, skill is rewarded in the long term
User avatar
Captain DavSav
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Postby hendy on Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:25 pm

DavSav wrote:
Molacole wrote:
You seem to think that Dug had a right to play anyone he wanted to. That's simply not the way it works. He didn't have that right. I don't have that right. You don't have that right. No one on the site has that right. I think that's what's known as freedom of association. At this site we aren't forced to associate with anyone we don't want to, we aren't forced to play with anyone we don't want to.
this logic completely nullifies the point of having ranks... a substitute for your logic would be a win loss record instead.


Well, you all seam to believe Dug did not do the same. My guess is he had 10 times as many on his ignore list. I suspect he was very much afraid of losing points. He put players that he was afraid to lose against on ignore list. My guess is that Blitz put dug on ignore list because he was (to be nice) not a pleasant guy.


DUG WAS NOT SCARED OF ANY1 DAV. BLITZ WAS SCARED OF DUG. DUG CHALLENGED BLITZ 24/7
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class hendy
 
Posts: 656
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:33 pm

Postby Kayla on Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:48 pm

id have to agree with hendy, ive seen many posts about it
User avatar
Major Kayla
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:43 am
Location: Sedalia Missouri

Postby DavSav on Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:11 am

hendy wrote:
DavSav wrote:
Molacole wrote:
You seem to think that Dug had a right to play anyone he wanted to. That's simply not the way it works. He didn't have that right. I don't have that right. You don't have that right. No one on the site has that right. I think that's what's known as freedom of association. At this site we aren't forced to associate with anyone we don't want to, we aren't forced to play with anyone we don't want to.
this logic completely nullifies the point of having ranks... a substitute for your logic would be a win loss record instead.


Well, you all seam to believe Dug did not do the same. My guess is he had 10 times as many on his ignore list. I suspect he was very much afraid of losing points. He put players that he was afraid to lose against on ignore list. My guess is that Blitz put dug on ignore list because he was (to be nice) not a pleasant guy.


DUG WAS NOT SCARED OF ANY1 DAV. BLITZ WAS SCARED OF DUG. DUG CHALLENGED BLITZ 24/7


I am not the only one seeing through dugs bullshit and I got on his ignorelist after winning 2 out of 3 gamas against him.
Wrong? You mean like........morally?
Luck is rewarded in the short term, skill is rewarded in the long term
User avatar
Captain DavSav
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Postby alex_white101 on Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:08 am

what was the score between dug and blitz? as in ratio wise.
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class alex_white101
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users