At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progressBigBallinStalin wrote:sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Moderator: Community Team
At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progressBigBallinStalin wrote:sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
I am not too concerned about how a pussy might feel about this.HapSmo19 wrote: I'm sure the whole story would be that he didn't actually have any money on him(he was at home in a low-rent/high crime neighborhood). You know, in the kind of place where you leave you're wallet inside and take your gun with you when you step out for a smoke...Want me to break down the neighborhood for you?(cuz I will)
It's almost like you're saying he deserved to be shot for not having his money on him when a super-special guy with a gun came by and told him to hand it over.
Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.Phatscotty wrote: Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
kalishnikov wrote:At the battle of Thermopylae king Leonidas was confronted with a far superior force which was better armed and had a much more intrinsic supply chain, before the battle he's approached by the "king" of the Persians who made him a simple offer "lay down your arms and embrace me, I shall make you the lord of all of Greece! The very Mediterranean will bow low to you!"
Leonidas looks back to his pitifully small band of resistance fighters, insurgents if you will, most of which have been his close, personal friends since boyhood, and to a man they unwaveringly meet his gaze. He lowers his gaze and for a moment contemplates the offer, that his friends and family should survive, that his culture would live another century. At that moment an unidentified man amongst his ranks draws his sword. In the deathly calm before battle the sound of the sword being drawn from its scabbard brought him back to reality, not only with it's familiar sound but also with the connotation it brings: as long as we hold arms, we hold our own destiny in our hands, no man shall be our master unless we CHOOSE to obey.
The Great King turns to the Master of Persia and, facing certain death of himself and everyone he's ever known, screams "MOLON LABE!" and charges headlong into battle followed by those who would rather die then be ruled by a virtue to which they do not swear allegiance, to be told how to live and who to pay tribute to. To some, there are worse things then death.
To those who've fought for and won their own place in this world, who've watched their friends bleed out into the dirt until breath escapes them, to those that have carried Last Letters to the families who cared, in the name of what WE believe in, our arms ARE NOT a tool, they are the very symbol of our freedom no different then the Statue of Liberty, the bald eagle or the White House.
If anything is worth dying for, it is freedom.PLAYER57832 wrote:Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.Phatscotty wrote: Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
I believe you missed the point. Dying instead of handing over a couple hundred bucks is stupidity, not "freedom". Freedom IS worth fighting for, but not stupidity.Phatscotty wrote:If anything is worth dying for, it is freedom.PLAYER57832 wrote:Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.Phatscotty wrote: Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
I believe I was the one making the point. This gets old Player and no matter what you say, people can be alive and free.PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe you missed the point. Dying instead of handing over a couple hundred bucks is stupidity, not "freedom". Freedom IS worth fighting for, but not stupidity.Phatscotty wrote:If anything is worth dying for, it is freedom.PLAYER57832 wrote:Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.Phatscotty wrote: Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
What does the Broken Clock analogy mean?Phatscotty wrote:At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progressBigBallinStalin wrote:sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
I do sincerely hope that you're not this thoroughly irrational in real life. I mean...this is just a caricature of you, right? Please tell me it is.Phatscotty wrote:OIC. Let the criminals take over. Whenever someone tries to rob you, just give the robber your money and your car.Woodruff wrote:Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Woodruff's motto: "Go ahead fellas! Tread on me! Yeah! Tread the shit out of me baby!"
Why do you insist on being a dumbshit, PhatScotty? Is it some sort of congenital condition that you can't seem to overcome?Phatscotty wrote: I mean, how free is someone who must hand over all their money whenever a criminal demands it? WTF are you kidding me? Nobody wants to live in that world, except for you and Woodruff.
I think you've got that backwards. Conservatives are pussies who need to own guns to feel safe(and help deal with the obvious insecurities found in most gun owners) And Liberals are idiots because they argue with conservatives on topics like 'is more gun control necessary'.Army of GOD wrote:There's an obvious fundamental disagreement here. Liberals are pussies and conservatives are idiots.
I'm not sure which one is worse.
Calling people names and fomenting hate is super smart of you though. You said in your post that you should just hand the cash over to the criminal. That is as irrational as it gets. There is no way around that one, (unless you call people names n stuff!)Woodruff wrote:Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
It's not irrational at all. I'm sorry that you believe your life is only worth the $100 you have in your wallet at the time, but I happen to recognize that my life is worth far more than that. Only an idiot endangers their life unnecessarily. Like I said, I know you like to pretend that you know more than I do about how to react in a dangerous situation, but you consistently say things on the subject that make no rational sense.Phatscotty wrote:Calling people names and fomenting hate is super smart of you though. You said in your post that you should just hand the cash over to the criminal. That is as irrational as it gets. There is no way around that one, (unless you call people names n stuff!)Woodruff wrote:Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
It means that we can protect ourselves from robbers and muggers and rapists and murderers, and especially protect ourselves from people who try to infringe on our second amendment rights. I know to you guys this is just idiotic psycho babble, but they are inalienable rights. Criticize me for standing up for them all you like. Say what you want it doesn't matter to me. I know my rights, I have my rights, and I will keep my rights no matter what haters try to say or do.BigBallinStalin wrote:What does the Broken Clock analogy mean?Phatscotty wrote:At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progressBigBallinStalin wrote:sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Of course you don't...everyone on this site recognizes that you do your damndest to ignore anything that shows your arguments to be the tripe that they are. Nobody expects you to do anything with sound counter-arguments but ignore them.Phatscotty wrote:I don't even ever respond to you.
I don't insult you for the sake of insulting someone. I insult you because you truly deserve nothing but insults. You're nothing but a troll. Based on the statements that you make in these fora and the lengths you go to in order to ignore relevant information...if you were any less intelligent, you would have to be watered twice per week.Phatscotty wrote:You are the one always responding to me, always harassing me.
You only have me responding now because you are insulting the shit out of me for the sake of insulting someone and I stand up to hatred and flaming. You have nothing to say about the issue, you only say things about me.
Good day
You may believe you know all of those things, but you don't seem to know what the Broken Clock Analogy means.Phatscotty wrote:It means that we can protect ourselves from robbers and muggers and rapists and murderers, and especially protect ourselves from people who try to infringe on our second amendment rights. I know to you guys this is just idiotic psycho babble, but they are inalienable rights. Criticize me for standing up for them all you like. Say what you want it doesn't matter to me. I know my rights, I have my rights, and I will keep my rights no matter what haters try to say or do.BigBallinStalin wrote:What does the Broken Clock analogy mean?Phatscotty wrote:At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progressBigBallinStalin wrote:sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.

Yes, you should definitely stop blathering about nothingness, flaming and trolling, Phatscotty. It'd be a nice change of pace.Phatscotty wrote:It's too bad only a couple posters have even talked about the topic and all the rest is a bunch of blathering about nothingness, flaming, and trolling. It was a good fantasy thread Symm!
You made actual points?Woodruff wrote:Now, would you care to respond to the actual points that I've made...?
We need to design that flag for him.Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff's motto: "Go ahead fellas! Tread on me! Yeah! Tread the shit out of me baby!"
The victim might have done well to "fantasize" pretending to hand his wallet over but instead unloading a clip. He was able to use the gun to keep his life and his wallet, obvisouly (ya know, they already shot him...and were going to leave him for dead....). The violence is escalated the moment a criminal decides to commit a crime, not the moment the victim tries to protect themselves.BigBallinStalin wrote:The Broken Clock analogy:
A broken clock is correct two times a day, but every other time is incorrect. In other words, there are instances when a certain stance is correct, but most of the time, it isn't.
Phatscotty cites one example of how a gun presumably saved someone's life in order to prove his point that bearing arms is generally safer for the gun-bearer. "Presumably" because the Hero was shot in the stomach as well--probably when he pulled out his pistol... And if not, there's still a high chance that violence will escalate when both have a gun anyway.
You cited just one example, Phatsco; that's it. Do you really think that's enough to prove your point, or is this another weak attempt at trolling?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.