
so gen.lee wont play me, but he'll sit there and give advice to other player with a low score, playing me. I guess NoSurvivors know it was happening as well. great job you 3, way to keep the game honest.
*non-farming by cc mods standards.
Moderator: Community Team

whatever you say guy, with your 11,000+ post count. go find a tall tree and a short rope, and do us all a favor.natty_dread wrote:get a life.

might wanna re-read the op. no flames at all.owenshooter wrote:it does suck, and i know how you feel about the General... however, i'm in before the Flame Thread lock...-el Jesus negro
All of who? You and your imaginary friends? Or are you suffering from MPD?Master Bush wrote:whatever you say guy, with your 11,000+ post count. go find a tall tree and a short rope, and do us all a favor.natty_dread wrote:get a life.

Yaz has played over 2200 games here and has a 4.8 rating, so she knows what she's doing. The didn't need to team up to beat me in a 1v1 game.oVo wrote:It's still a 1v1... unless someone else actually played the Yaz account.
Advice is often asked for and received by noobs and others
trying to improve their playing tactics.

No, not very. What's your point?Master Bush wrote:You're not very bright are you guy?
Umm... seeing as how I'm not very bright I might be mistaken, but last I checked having a high post count doesn't indicate a lack of life... all it indicates is that one writes lots of posts.Master Bush wrote:Pointing out someone's high post count isnt a really a bad thing, unless that poster is telling another poster to get a life. You see, having over 11,000 posts would indicate that you yourself have no life, and really shouldnt get throwing the term "get a life" around.

The concept that went over your pointy head...Master Bush wrote:They didn't need to team up to beat me in a 1v1 game.
this part?Master Bush wrote: might wanna re-read the op. no flames at all.
cheers mate!

I believe "Yazoo" is something southern (Georgia?). Definitely a potential Civil War reference.AAFitz wrote:I would like to point out that this post kind of makes Gen.Lee look like a good guy, or at least explains how he is Gettinhed.
I think it would be more surprising if a player named Gen.LeeGettinhed wasnt helping out a player named Yazoochick.
I admit to nothing.BigBallinStalin wrote:Master Bush,
do you admit that you sometimes post abrasive yet unprovoked comments in the forum?
LOLMaster Bush wrote:whatever you say guy, with your 11,000+ post count. go find a tall tree and a short rope, and do us all a favor.natty_dread wrote:get a life.
Is that another Gettinhed joke?Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:WOW, several things:
first, thank you to so many people I don't know for your positive input.
no, not intended that way. and I'd think "positive TAKE on that". . or "taking my output" would have been a more straight-forward Gettinhed joke. Not looking to derail this important threads, just keep the logic straight.AAFitz wrote:Is that another Gettinhed joke?Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:WOW, several things:
first, thank you to so many people I don't know for your positive input.
lol what are you talking about? This wasn't a cheating and abuse report. it's a post in general discussions, about whether a 2200+ games player should be getting help from another high scored player in a 1v1 game.ViperOverLord wrote:LOLMaster Bush wrote:whatever you say guy, with your 11,000+ post count. go find a tall tree and a short rope, and do us all a favor.natty_dread wrote:get a life.
And to the topic at hand -- As far as I can see GLGH has done nothing wrong. According to the best of my knowledge none of these actions are against CC standards.
- Advising another player during his/her game.
- Not accepting a challenge.
Also, you're just endangering your own CC status, since bringing accusations against members in non-cheating and abuse forums is not typically tolerated.
And for the fun of it - In before the lock. (Just once, I want to say - In after the lock).
goodGen.LeeGettinhed wrote:no, not intended that way. and I'd think "positive TAKE on that". . or "taking my output" would have been a more straight-forward Gettinhed joke. Not looking to derail this important threads, just keep the logic straight.AAFitz wrote:Is that another Gettinhed joke?Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:WOW, several things:
first, thank you to so many people I don't know for your positive input.
* * *
and. . . if this Thread Creator (he whose name shall not be uttered) is so damn intelligent, why are 7 of these 20 posts from him? Can't he:
-learn to edit his original response
-think coherently and get higher % of his thoughts out there the first time
-create a thread that is important enough to get to 20 without him adding over 1/3?
-if it is to address each response, was he captain of the Debate Team? uh oh