Moderator: Community Team













natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
















Night Strike wrote:bedub1 wrote:I'd say a single mother, working 2 jobs to support her child is a far greater person to provide advice to Romney that is his wife who hasn't ever had a job.
I consider the Romney's to be completely out of touch with reality, without a clue as to what's going on in the "real" world.
I still support these statements. The Romney's are so far into the 1% they have no clue about the plights of the 99%. They don't understand needing health insurance, or it being too expensive. They don't understand what a loaf of bread costs, and it's affects on society. When prices increase they think "yay! more profits for me" where as the rest of the world thinks "shit, now my family will go hungry".
That argument might be valid for the Romneys, but it is NOT characteristic of the vast majority of stay at home moms around the country. They are acutely aware of the growing prices on the items they have to buy on a weekly basis and the lies the government keeps telling them in regards to inflation. They know how badly those higher prices are harming the rest of the economy through a decrease in discretionary spending.
jgordon1111 wrote: YOU are missing the point as a person of means who has never been faced with having to get a job or struggle she is out of touch and if romney thinks she is the pulse of american women it shows he is out of touch and an idiot for making the statement he did.
kentington wrote:I don't think I am missing the point. I think the statement should just be referring to Mrs. Romney and have nothing to do with being a stay at home mom. She is the one out of touch not all stay at home moms. Stay at home moms are more in touch than a lot of people I see in the work force.
patches70 wrote:And another thing, bedub, even Obama (to his credit) has come out and said how offensive and flat out wrong it was of Rosen's comments. Condemned by virtually everyone. Except you seem to still be siding with her comments even though Romney's own political opponents don't agree in the slightest (at least publicly).
Can you not see how far out of touch and sanity you are in your defense of a rhetoric that is so offensive, unwise and downright despicable that anyone with half a brain has distanced themselves from?
Why do you continue to latch on to such reasoning from the OP that is so thoroughly condemned by all in the political arena? Even a simpleton can see the implications of such a line of thought. A line of reasoning justifying the complete lack of trust and common courtesy one should show their partner in marriage.
oVo wrote:One point I believe some people are trying to make is this... Mrs.Romney is not the typical "stay at home mom" and there are many who think any comparison to parents who are struggling to keep a roof over their heads while meeting the everyday needs of their kids is not a realistic comparison. Many families have struggled and made a lot of personal sacrifices just to allow one parent to be at home. The Romneys are not one of those families.







bedub1 wrote:Night Strike wrote:bedub1 wrote:I'd say a single mother, working 2 jobs to support her child is a far greater person to provide advice to Romney that is his wife who hasn't ever had a job.
I consider the Romney's to be completely out of touch with reality, without a clue as to what's going on in the "real" world.
I still support these statements. The Romney's are so far into the 1% they have no clue about the plights of the 99%. They don't understand needing health insurance, or it being too expensive. They don't understand what a loaf of bread costs, and it's affects on society. When prices increase they think "yay! more profits for me" where as the rest of the world thinks "shit, now my family will go hungry".
That argument might be valid for the Romneys, but it is NOT characteristic of the vast majority of stay at home moms around the country. They are acutely aware of the growing prices on the items they have to buy on a weekly basis and the lies the government keeps telling them in regards to inflation. They know how badly those higher prices are harming the rest of the economy through a decrease in discretionary spending.
This is my point. The rMoney's can pretend they are part of the vast majority of stay at home moms, but it's a lie. Mrs. rMoney can pretend she knows what she's talking about, and can pretend that she speaks for all women in the world, but it's a lie. This woman hasn't had a job. She doesn't have any first-hand experience about what it's like to get a job.




















Night Strike wrote:bedub1 wrote:Night Strike wrote:bedub1 wrote:I'd say a single mother, working 2 jobs to support her child is a far greater person to provide advice to Romney that is his wife who hasn't ever had a job.
I consider the Romney's to be completely out of touch with reality, without a clue as to what's going on in the "real" world.
I still support these statements. The Romney's are so far into the 1% they have no clue about the plights of the 99%. They don't understand needing health insurance, or it being too expensive. They don't understand what a loaf of bread costs, and it's affects on society. When prices increase they think "yay! more profits for me" where as the rest of the world thinks "shit, now my family will go hungry".
That argument might be valid for the Romneys, but it is NOT characteristic of the vast majority of stay at home moms around the country. They are acutely aware of the growing prices on the items they have to buy on a weekly basis and the lies the government keeps telling them in regards to inflation. They know how badly those higher prices are harming the rest of the economy through a decrease in discretionary spending.
This is my point. The rMoney's can pretend they are part of the vast majority of stay at home moms, but it's a lie. Mrs. rMoney can pretend she knows what she's talking about, and can pretend that she speaks for all women in the world, but it's a lie. This woman hasn't had a job. She doesn't have any first-hand experience about what it's like to get a job.
Neither does Michelle Obama (nor the President for that matter), so what's your point? The economy IS what all people should be worried about for this election, and the President has a horrible record on the topic.
I'd say a single mother, working 2 jobs to support her child is a far greater person to provide advice to Romney that is his wife who hasn't ever had a job.



























bedub1 wrote:If rMoney is looking for economic advice, he shouldn't give too much weight to what his wife says.

my wife tells me that what women really care about







bedub1 wrote:So you guys are telling me that she knows what women really care about? She has personally interviewed every single woman in America, and knows their deepest thoughts and desires? She is the best person for rMoney to speak with in order to understand what women think?
bedub wrote: Like I said, you don't ask the taro card reader how to fix your car; you ask a mechanic.

oVo wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Well, Obama is telling women all across America that being a mother "isn't a real job".....
No he isn't, you dummy.
Mrs.Romney's MS and cancer are bigger character building events in her life than her experiences as a housewife. Do you think she has spent much time at the grocery store or cleaning house in recent years? Being the wife of a wealthy man has it's perks and still the recent comments are ridiculous.

























bedub1 wrote:My point is there are people with far more experience, with far more knowledge than his wife. You don't ask her about Health Insurance and the medial industry, you ask a poor person without health insurance who can't get health insurance.
bedub1 wrote:You don't ask her about what it's like for women in the workplace, because she isn't in the workplace.




















patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:So you guys are telling me that she knows what women really care about? She has personally interviewed every single woman in America, and knows their deepest thoughts and desires? She is the best person for rMoney to speak with in order to understand what women think?
By that criteria, show me anyone who is qualified to understand what women think (or qualified on anything for that matter) and be sure to include links to evidence that they have met all the above criteria you cite.
Thank you.bedub wrote: Like I said, you don't ask the taro card reader how to fix your car; you ask a mechanic.
And if one were to wish to gain insight into what women think, they should ask a woman.
Ann Romney is a woman. Or do you think she is not qualified to be a woman?







bedub1 wrote:They should ask a woman who is in the 99%.

patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:They should ask a woman who is in the 99%.
And this woman "personally interviewed every single woman in America, and knows their deepest thoughts and desires" (your words), please show me this woman of the 99% you speak of that has these qualifications that you have decided makes Ann Romney an ill choice.
All you do is regurgitate talking points and your vitriol towards Ann Romney is sorely misplaced.
I am no fan of Romney's political positions, there is little difference between him and Obama. But your line of reasoning is based solely on your perception as fed to you by people with agendas. Ann Romney, as far as I can tell, is a decent person who is by all accounts a loving and loyal wife, a good mother, and a loved Grandmother. To level such hate to her over class warfare issues is foolish.







bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it. Maybe you guys do ask your auto mechanic to fix your teeth. More power to you.




















bedub1 wrote:
You don't ask the queen of england about what it's like to be a woman in england. You ask 100 random women you find walking on the streets. You don't ask random women on the street about what it's like to be the queen of england, you ask the queen.

bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it.
bedub wrote:Lets ask Ann about the economy. Ann, what do you think of the economy? "It's great! We keep making more and more money! And we pay less and less taxes. Prices keep going up, which keeps pushing our profits up. Nobody really needs to worry about the economy though, I've got more than enough money."

patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it.
Can't refute? Oh, you mean like this little gem here-bedub wrote:Lets ask Ann about the economy. Ann, what do you think of the economy? "It's great! We keep making more and more money! And we pay less and less taxes. Prices keep going up, which keeps pushing our profits up. Nobody really needs to worry about the economy though, I've got more than enough money."
That is an outright lie there, unless of course you can provide a link to prove she actually said that. You can't of course, your idea "proof" is unimpressive, to say the least.....







bedub1 wrote:patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it.
Can't refute? Oh, you mean like this little gem here-bedub wrote:Lets ask Ann about the economy. Ann, what do you think of the economy? "It's great! We keep making more and more money! And we pay less and less taxes. Prices keep going up, which keeps pushing our profits up. Nobody really needs to worry about the economy though, I've got more than enough money."
That is an outright lie there, unless of course you can provide a link to prove she actually said that. You can't of course, your idea "proof" is unimpressive, to say the least.....
Oh no that was just my little made up story. I've given a long list of why I think she's not qualified. You guys refuted with "she's a woman".

bedub1 wrote:patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it.
Can't refute? Oh, you mean like this little gem here-bedub wrote:Lets ask Ann about the economy. Ann, what do you think of the economy? "It's great! We keep making more and more money! And we pay less and less taxes. Prices keep going up, which keeps pushing our profits up. Nobody really needs to worry about the economy though, I've got more than enough money."
That is an outright lie there, unless of course you can provide a link to prove she actually said that. You can't of course, your idea "proof" is unimpressive, to say the least.....
Oh no that was just my little made up story. I've given a long list of why I think she's not qualified. You guys refuted with "she's a woman".




















Night Strike wrote:bedub1 wrote:patches70 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I've explained time and time again why I feel she isn't qualified to be providing advice and you guys can't refute it.
Can't refute? Oh, you mean like this little gem here-bedub wrote:Lets ask Ann about the economy. Ann, what do you think of the economy? "It's great! We keep making more and more money! And we pay less and less taxes. Prices keep going up, which keeps pushing our profits up. Nobody really needs to worry about the economy though, I've got more than enough money."
That is an outright lie there, unless of course you can provide a link to prove she actually said that. You can't of course, your idea "proof" is unimpressive, to say the least.....
Oh no that was just my little made up story. I've given a long list of why I think she's not qualified. You guys refuted with "she's a woman".
Because that's why she was asked the question "What do women care about in this election?"!!! Sheesh. Or do you think rich women aren't allowed to have opinions on topics, especially if they mention economics?














Users browsing this forum: No registered users