DoomYoshi wrote:Ghostly (2) - strike wolf, pancakemix
No lynch (0) -
pancakemix (0) -
Victor (3) - Jonty, Clever, shield
Tails (1) - ghost
Shield (2) - edoc, Tails
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.
Deadline is May 6th.
Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:Ghostly (2) - strike wolf, pancakemix
No lynch (0) -
pancakemix (0) -
Victor (3) - Jonty, Clever, shield
Tails (1) - ghost
Shield (2) - edoc, Tails
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.
Deadline is May 6th.
ghostly447 wrote:And a clearly laid out reason to vote him?
Edoc and Tails rose to the top of my list. It seems your clear reasoning is because he tried to be active and give out a list of players who he thinks are scummy..Something I dont seem to remember being posted all that much by most people. And for some reason he is now going to have a random wagon on him that he cant even defend himself against?
Yeaaaahhh. Unvote Vote Tails FOS Edoc FOS PCM
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Word.
vote shield
-Tails
....now he gives a shit?
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:ghostly447 wrote:And a clearly laid out reason to vote him?
Edoc and Tails rose to the top of my list. It seems your clear reasoning is because he tried to be active and give out a list of players who he thinks are scummy..Something I dont seem to remember being posted all that much by most people. And for some reason he is now going to have a random wagon on him that he cant even defend himself against?
Yeaaaahhh. Unvote Vote Tails FOS Edoc FOS PCM
I voted the behavior. As I stated previously, shield's been gung-ho for the inactives. Fine, whatever. But get about 3-4 votes on a player and he's there to hop on. He's a leaf blowing with the winds.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Word.
vote shield
-Tails
....now he gives a shit?
I give you props for giving any fucks about the full derp that went on a few pages ago. Unfortunately, I have neither the time nor patience, so I'm relegated to wait for rational, lucid conversation.
-Tails
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I voted the behavior. As I stated previously, shield's been gung-ho for the inactives. Fine, whatever. But get about 3-4 votes on a player and he's there to hop on. He's a leaf blowing with the winds.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Word.
vote shield
-Tails
....now he gives a shit?
I give you props for giving any fucks about the full derp that went on a few pages ago. Unfortunately, I have neither the time nor patience, so I'm relegated to wait for rational, lucid conversation.
-Tails
CLEVER wrote:seriously why does noone care about this game? do you know how disrespectful that is to doom. if you dont care your obviously should just lynch yourself or quit if your not caring your worthless to town and just dead weight.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:CLEVER wrote:seriously why does noone care about this game? do you know how disrespectful that is to doom. if you dont care your obviously should just lynch yourself or quit if your not caring your worthless to town and just dead weight.
I think you misunderstand me. Day 1, and overall the game, was pretty swell. There was a period at the start of Day 2 where the effort to keep up wasn't worth it. Seriously, I'm extremely busy, like every day of the week. I don't have the inclination to argue with somebody over dictionary definitions. I'm sorry if you feel that means my play is inadequate, but that's how it is.
And this is the beginning of another exchange I hope to avoid. How about your thoughts on shield?
-Tails
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:CLEVER wrote:seriously why does noone care about this game? do you know how disrespectful that is to doom. if you dont care your obviously should just lynch yourself or quit if your not caring your worthless to town and just dead weight.
I think you misunderstand me. Day 1, and overall the game, was pretty swell. There was a period at the start of Day 2 where the effort to keep up wasn't worth it. Seriously, I'm extremely busy, like every day of the week. I don't have the inclination to argue with somebody over dictionary definitions. I'm sorry if you feel that means my play is inadequate, but that's how it is.
And this is the beginning of another exchange I hope to avoid. How about your thoughts on shield?
-Tails
shield. i would have to look back on his case or if someone could sum it up that would be nice but i will be out of town this weekend till monday so i dont know if ill be able to get on.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:CLEVER wrote:seriously why does noone care about this game? do you know how disrespectful that is to doom. if you dont care your obviously should just lynch yourself or quit if your not caring your worthless to town and just dead weight.
I think you misunderstand me. Day 1, and overall the game, was pretty swell. There was a period at the start of Day 2 where the effort to keep up wasn't worth it. Seriously, I'm extremely busy, like every day of the week. I don't have the inclination to argue with somebody over dictionary definitions. I'm sorry if you feel that means my play is inadequate, but that's how it is.
And this is the beginning of another exchange I hope to avoid. How about your thoughts on shield?
-Tails
shield. i would have to look back on his case or if someone could sum it up that would be nice but i will be out of town this weekend till monday so i dont know if ill be able to get on.
... Death by stagnation. Place a vote before you leave if you may...
Some7hingCLEVER wrote: i wont vote now that i think about it cause the case on him is the same on me. that would be just as bad as voting myself and why are we voting him while he is out of town with no chance to defend himself
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote: i wont vote now that i think about it cause the case on him is the same on me. that would be just as bad as voting myself and why are we voting him while he is out of town with no chance to defend himself
So you heed the logic, but won't go along because you know it would implicate you? That makes sense, but it's also sort of telling. Do as I say, not as I do, methinks.
I'm kind of at a loss with this day. With eldario's vote (which doesn't sit completely well with me, but no time to deal with that now), victor is the most viable lynch option. I dislike that, as much as he hasn't been active. We COULD lynch him but his inactivity isn't an indicator of scumminess given its being forum-wide. Thoughts?
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:pancakemix wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote: i wont vote now that i think about it cause the case on him is the same on me. that would be just as bad as voting myself and why are we voting him while he is out of town with no chance to defend himself
So you heed the logic, but won't go along because you know it would implicate you? That makes sense, but it's also sort of telling. Do as I say, not as I do, methinks.
I'm kind of at a loss with this day. With eldario's vote (which doesn't sit completely well with me, but no time to deal with that now), victor is the most viable lynch option. I dislike that, as much as he hasn't been active. We COULD lynch him but his inactivity isn't an indicator of scumminess given its being forum-wide. Thoughts?
telling how so? i think if i voted for him then it would be scummier than not voting. thats just how i think.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:pancakemix wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote: i wont vote now that i think about it cause the case on him is the same on me. that would be just as bad as voting myself and why are we voting him while he is out of town with no chance to defend himself
So you heed the logic, but won't go along because you know it would implicate you? That makes sense, but it's also sort of telling. Do as I say, not as I do, methinks.
I'm kind of at a loss with this day. With eldario's vote (which doesn't sit completely well with me, but no time to deal with that now), victor is the most viable lynch option. I dislike that, as much as he hasn't been active. We COULD lynch him but his inactivity isn't an indicator of scumminess given its being forum-wide. Thoughts?
telling how so? i think if i voted for him then it would be scummier than not voting. thats just how i think.
No, it's a catch-22. Nothing you can do about that. Your mistake was pointing it out.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Sorry all the last three days were hectic for me.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users