F400 Clan Ranking [July in Platoon Report!]

[IcePack]

show: June 1 2017

show: May 1 2017

show: March 1 2017

show: Feb 1 2017

show: Jan 1 2017

COMPLETED WARS LISTED BELOW
Winner / Loser / Winning Score / Losing Score / Date

show: Recent Completed Wars Shortcut

show: All Completed Wars included in Ranking

***The database is case sensitive and the abbreviations must be exactly the same to count. So make sure your clan is listed exactly the same each battle and that the score is correct.

Original FD Link: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 29&start=0
Gunn217 Link: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 80&start=0

[IcePack]

show: Dec 1 2016

show: Nov 1 2016

show: Oct 1 2016

show: Sept 1 2016

show: Aug 1 2016

show: July 1 2016

show: June 1 2016

show: May 1 2016

show: April 1 2016

show: Mar 1 2016

show: Feb 1 2016

show: Jan 1 2016 in depth

show: Dec 1 2015

show: Nov 1 2015

show: Oct 1 2015

show: Sept 15 2015

show: Sept 1 2015

show: Aug 1 2015

show: July 1 2015

show: June 1 2015

show: May 1 2015

show: Apr 15 2015

show: Apr 1 2015

show: Mar 1 2015

show: Feb 1 2015

show: Jan 1 2015

show: Dec 1 2014

show: Nov 15 2014

show: Sept 15 2014

show: Sept 1 2014

show: Aug 15 2014

show: Aug 1 2014

show: Posted in Error

show: July 15 2014

show: July 1 2014

show: June 15 2014

show: May 15 2014

show: May 1 2014

show: April 1 2014

show: Mar 15 2014

show: Mar 1 2014

show: Feb 15 2014

show: Feb 1 2014

show: Jan 15 2014

show: Jan 1 2014

show: Dec 1 2013

show: Nov 15 2013

show: Nov 1 2013

show: Oct 15 2013

show: Oct 1 2013

show: Sept 1 2013

show: Aug 15 2013

show: Aug 1 2013

show: July 15 2013

show: July 1 2013

show: June 15 2013

show: June 1 2013

show: May 15 2013

show: May 1 2013

show: Special CC4 Update

show: April 15 2013

show: April 1 2013

show: Mar 15 2013

show: Mar 1 2013

show: Feb 15 2013

show: Feb 1 2013

show: Jan 15 2013

show: Jan 1 2013

show: Dec 1 2012

show: Nov 1 2012

show: Oct 15

show: Sept 15

show: Aug 15 2012

show: Aug 1 2012

show: July 2012

show: June 1 2012

show: May 1 2012

show: April 1 2012

show: March 1 2012

show: Jan 1 2012

show: Dec 1 2011

show: Oct 19 2011

show: June 13 2011

COMPLETED WARS LISTED BELOW
Winner / Loser / Winning Score / Losing Score / Date

show: Recent Completed Wars Shortcut

show: All Completed Wars included in Ranking

***The database is case sensitive and the abbreviations must be exactly the same to count. So make sure your clan is listed exactly the same each battle and that the score is correct.

Original FD Link: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 29&start=0
Gunn217 Link: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 80&start=0

[John Deere]

Thanks for taking it over/ keeping it going!

[Chariot of Fire]

Good job Ice. And thanks Gunn for all you've done to date.

[freakns]

whos naked pictures do you have?


Gunn, tnx for all the work man

[Chariot of Fire]

whos naked pictures do you have?

Just one, of your playmate freaky:

[ViperOverLord]

Alright, stop, collaborate and listen. Ice is in charge of a brand new edition.

[TheCrown]

Much respect to those who are currently or have in the past put time and effort into making CC a better place to live.

[chemefreak]

Can you explain how it works?

[IcePack]

Can you explain how it works?

There's a fairly detailed explanation of how it works by FD. If you follow the original link, he links to the explanation off his first post.

IcePack

[Foxglove]

Thanks for picking this up, IcePack!

[pamoa]

tanks to Gunn
and to you Ice

[chapcrap]

Can you explain how it works?

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Some things just can't be answered.

[chemefreak]

Can you explain how it works?

There's a fairly detailed explanation of how it works by FD. If you follow the original link, he links to the explanation off his first post.

IcePack

Actually, what I mean is, do you (the person now running the thing) know how it works? Can you explain the Otpisani issue? What I am thinking here is: Is this the rating system we really want to use without FD running it if no one understands EXACTLY what it is providing us? Or since it seems good enough...then it will work?

Ice, I am not being a dick. I'm really glad you decided to help out and pick this up from Gunn. However, I think we may need to ask ourselves: Is it time to figure something else out? Just a thought.

[IcePack]

Can you explain how it works?

There's a fairly detailed explanation of how it works by FD. If you follow the original link, he links to the explanation off his first post.

IcePack

Actually, what I mean is, do you (the person now running the thing) know how it works? Can you explain the Otpisani issue? What I am thinking here is: Is this the rating system we really want to use without FD running it if no one understands EXACTLY what it is providing us? Or since it seems good enough...then it will work?

Ice, I am not being a dick. I'm really glad you decided to help out and pick this up from Gunn. However, I think we may need to ask ourselves: Is it time to figure something else out? Just a thought.

I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.

IcePack

[chemefreak]

I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.

IcePack

I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?

[IcePack]

I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.

[chemefreak]

I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.

No worries. My hope is that it is a simple fix. Everyone seems to like this ranking system so much.

[Foxglove]

I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.

No worries. My hope is that it is a simple fix. Everyone seems to like this ranking system so much.

It's been, by far, the best one that we've ever had.

And by "best" I mean there have been fewer complaints that it's inaccurate than any of the other systems we've used over the years.

[chemefreak]

I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.

No worries. My hope is that it is a simple fix. Everyone seems to like this ranking system so much.

It's been, by far, the best one that we've ever had.

And by "best" I mean there have been fewer complaints that it's inaccurate than any of the other systems we've used over the years.

Amen.

[Crazyirishman]

I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.

IcePack

I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?

Quite simple I think. 1.) Start new clan 2.) Win your 1st two clan challenges 3.) Enjoy a spot in the top 10

[chemefreak]

I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.

IcePack

I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?

Quite simple I think. 1.) Start new clan 2.) Win your 1st two clan challenges 3.) Enjoy a spot in the top 10

That is not the way the Algorithm should function. My money is on an incorrect piece of data. If it is not, then the formula needs examined to see if it is an inherent issue or one created by the transfer of knowledge from FD to Gunn to Ice.

[IcePack]

I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.

IcePack

I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?

Quite simple I think. 1.) Start new clan 2.) Win your 1st two clan challenges 3.) Enjoy a spot in the top 10

That is not the way the Algorithm should function. My money is on an incorrect piece of data. If it is not, then the formula needs examined to see if it is an inherent issue or one created by the transfer of knowledge from FD to Gunn to Ice.

Well I haven't looked into the specifics yet, but the top 10 are merely 200 points away from "starting" positions. To gain weight you need 3-4 clan scores entered into the mix, and I believe if you win all of them you can "debut" in top ten (whether you stay there is another matter).

The same scenario happened with LHDD entering the top 10 after New Comers Cup 2, although (I believe) they've slowly drifted downwards from there.

The rating system is fairly reflective of clan strength, essentially the only "complaints" that I remember seeing in the past two threads are of new clans being able to peak relatively high.

For OTP however, I will check all data and ensure the information provided the algorithm is correct. Rest assured, even if the current spot is "correct" as OTP plays more clan wars they should theoretically "settle" where they more accurately should be.

IcePack

[John Deere]

That shouldn't be right Ice. We had to win something like 8 wars straight to get in the top 10. And one of those where in the top 10.

[IcePack]

That shouldn't be right Ice. We had to win something like 8 wars straight to get in the top 10. And one of those where in the top 10.

I just got home (worked some massive OT today) so I'll start checking some stats.

IcePack