Conquer Club

Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Celebrity Deathmatch - Michelle vs Ann

 
Total votes : 0

Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby bedub1 on Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:35 pm

http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolit ... ch_wri.php
One week after Ann Romney set a record for delivering a speech written at the lowest grade level in convention history by the wives of presidential nominees, Michelle Obama delivers a speech written at the highest ever grade level.

The First Lady's speech on Tuesday evening was delivered at a grade level of 12.84.
The wife of the 2012 Republican presidential nominee gave a speech written at just a 5.80 grade level.

Is it because Ann can't make out the complex words? Is it because Republicans can't understand the complex words? Is it because Republicans think at a 6th grade level, while Democrats think at a 13th grade level?

While discussing this, it's important to keep in mind this line from the article:
...a simplistically written speech does not necessarily mean it is a poor speech, nor that a speech with longer sentences is necessarily superior.
Colonel bedub1
 
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:11 pm

Maybe it has something to do with Ann's speech being twice as long?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby notyou2 on Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:48 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Maybe it has something to do with Ann's speech being twice as long?



Why do you keep acting like you are 12?
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Woodruff on Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:50 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Maybe it has something to do with Ann's speech being twice as long?


That actually makes sense to you?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Night Strike on Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:45 pm

Apparently lying and twisting the truth don't bring down your grade level?
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby rdsrds2120 on Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:54 pm

Night Strike wrote:Apparently lying and twisting the truth don't bring down your grade level?


It sure don't. Now, I doesn't know much about the two, but length isn't the determining factor when we consider speeches. Anyone can write fluff (not to discredit Ann, as I haven't heard either of them. Her's might have been great. I'm working ITT)

BMO
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:10 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Night Strike wrote:Apparently lying and twisting the truth don't bring down your grade level?


It sure don't. Now, I doesn't know much about the two, but length isn't the determining factor when we consider speeches. Anyone can write fluff (not to discredit Ann, as I haven't heard either of them. Her's might have been great. I'm working ITT)

BMO


All you can eat
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:16 am

I honestly think both women are intelligent and articulate. I have a lot of respect for Michelle Obama's initiatives on children's lunch/diet, while definitely recognizing that there are serious limits to what she can do. I suspect if MItt Romney is elected, then Ann will pick a similarly "nuetral", but positive issue to promote. That is what first ladies do.

I don't think I would want either to be president, but then... they are not running.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby jimboston on Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:13 am

bedub1 wrote:http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2012/09/michelle_obamas_dnc_speech_wri.php
One week after Ann Romney set a record for delivering a speech written at the lowest grade level in convention history by the wives of presidential nominees, Michelle Obama delivers a speech written at the highest ever grade level.

The First Lady's speech on Tuesday evening was delivered at a grade level of 12.84.
The wife of the 2012 Republican presidential nominee gave a speech written at just a 5.80 grade level.

Is it because Ann can't make out the complex words? Is it because Republicans can't understand the complex words? Is it because Republicans think at a 6th grade level, while Democrats think at a 13th grade level?

While discussing this, it's important to keep in mind this line from the article:
...a simplistically written speech does not necessarily mean it is a poor speech, nor that a speech with longer sentences is necessarily superior.



Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby john9blue on Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:36 am

jimboston wrote:
Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.


this is the most accurate summary so far in this thread.

using big words and complex grammar is often a barrier to effective communication. sometimes simple writing is indicative of a lack of intelligence, and sometimes it's indicative of a desire to communicate effectively with the largest amount of people.

i personally follow the maxim that simple vocabulary and grammar can communicate almost all ideas better than complex ones can. you'll rarely see me using unusual terminology or grammar on this forum despite the fact that i'm perfectly capable of doing so (i got a perfect score on the english ACT, for what it's worth). usually the people who take it as a sign of lower intelligence are the superficial morons who are only worried about how ideas look at first glance, as opposed to whether they are actually true
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:52 am

john9blue wrote:
jimboston wrote:
Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.


this is the most accurate summary so far in this thread.

using big words and complex grammar is often a barrier to effective communication.

Oh please.. the idea that Democrats were just some remote educate elite, and that education is somehow bad is one of the most destructive arguments in politics that exist. Sorry to see you have bought into it....
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby john9blue on Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:56 am

PLAYER57832 wrote:
john9blue wrote:
jimboston wrote:
Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.


this is the most accurate summary so far in this thread.

using big words and complex grammar is often a barrier to effective communication.

Oh please.. the idea that Democrats were just some remote educate elite, and that education is somehow bad is one of the most destructive arguments in politics that exist. Sorry to see you have bought into it....


wtf? you didn't even read my post.

it takes wisdom to know how to communicate most effectively. wisdom and education are completely different, but that doesn't mean education is bad.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby The Voice on Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:04 am

bedub1 wrote:Democrats think at a 13th grade level?


If someone told me that my cognitive ability matched that of a 13-grader, I'd feel insulted. Just sayin'

I suppose the reason you're not is that none of you diehard liberals or conservatives, republicans or democrats can think for yourselves.
Major The Voice
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Location, Location!

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby jimboston on Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:54 am

john9blue wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
john9blue wrote:
jimboston wrote:
Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.


this is the most accurate summary so far in this thread.

using big words and complex grammar is often a barrier to effective communication.

Oh please.. the idea that Democrats were just some remote educate elite, and that education is somehow bad is one of the most destructive arguments in politics that exist. Sorry to see you have bought into it....


wtf? you didn't even read my post.

it takes wisdom to know how to communicate most effectively. wisdom and education are completely different, but that doesn't mean education is bad.


waiting (with baited breath) for Player to reply...
Last edited by jimboston on Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby QoH on Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:01 am

The Voice wrote:
bedub1 wrote:Democrats think at a 13th grade level?


If someone told me that my cognitive ability matched that of a 13-grader, I'd feel insulted. Just sayin'

I suppose the reason you're not is that none of you diehard liberals or conservatives, republicans or democrats can think for yourselves.

Once you get into college, unless you specifically enter an English or writing major, your English skills/comprehension don't increase that much. If you're not constantly learning about it, you're using whatever level of english you last learned, which is in most cases, freshman or sophomore year of college.

Yes, some people who didn't go into english fields will have a better comprehension than others, but the base common denominator for english comprehension is a college understanding, not necessarily graduate etc.

Yes?
Image
Please don't invite me to any pickup games. I will decline the invite.
Major QoH
 
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:07 am

john9blue wrote:
jimboston wrote:
Because Republicans have to talk to the entire country, and unfortunately the average/median comprehension level of the voting population in this country is pretty low. Republicans want to make sure EVERYONE can understand where they stand on the issues.

The goal of the Democrat writers is to confuse the voting public into thinking they stand for one set of values, when in fact they stand for the opposite ideas. They achieve this goal by delivering speeches with language that the vast majority of their constituency can't understand. Their constituents are then confused, and impressed by their use of language, and like the mice from the story of the Pied Piper they just blindly follow.


this is the most accurate summary so far in this thread.

using big words and complex grammar is often a barrier to effective communication. sometimes simple writing is indicative of a lack of intelligence, and sometimes it's indicative of a desire to communicate effectively with the largest amount of people.

i personally follow the maxim that simple vocabulary and grammar can communicate almost all ideas better than complex ones can. you'll rarely see me using unusual terminology or grammar on this forum despite the fact that i'm perfectly capable of doing so (i got a perfect score on the english ACT, for what it's worth). usually the people who take it as a sign of lower intelligence are the superficial morons who are only worried about how ideas look at first glance, as opposed to whether they are actually true


RE: JB's second paragraph, it's only accurate at certain times. Politicians of both parties play that balancing act between "dumbing down" the speech and being more eloquent. In some cases, being unnecessarily complex may work, or it may backfired. I have yet to see the evidence on either party's effectiveness of their speechcraft. So, I must conclude 'that due to insufficient data, an accurate opinion cannot be formed.'

RE: your last paragraph, it depends on your target audience. Sometimes, speaking in layman terms can be frustrating (and unnecessarily wordy) in some circles; whereas, using technical terms can be unintentionally misleading and discouraging for other circles.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby john9blue on Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:44 am

obviously it depends on the audience. that's why politicians fake southern accents when they visit southern states.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:11 pm

john9blue wrote:obviously it depends on the audience. that's why politicians fake southern accents when they visit southern states.


I'm just highlighting that "i personally follow the maxim that simple vocabulary and grammar can communicate almost all ideas better than complex ones can" isn't always good advice. In other words, I'm against the "almost all" qualifier. The most accurate assertion would be: "it depends." I know I'm nitpicking, and you'd probably agree with me, but if not, please let me know.


For example, Thomas Sowell does a great job explaining Hayek in his book Intellectuals and Society (see parts on knowledge and economics). He uses simple vocabulary and grammar; however, he effectively uses big words at times. He's a great example of that balance which both you and I are discussing in regard to the general public.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby tzor on Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:46 pm

How to write a speech

How to Write a Speech and keep things simple. Few members in the audience will be impressed by your perficient choice of aberrant eclectic colloquialisms. So learn why you need to write on 5th-grade level and keep PhD-isms out of your speeches


As you can see the elitist snobs will be ... well elitist snobs, but the people who actually work on writing speeches for a living will tell you to do what Ann Romney did ... write at the 5th grade level. This isn't a thesis argument.

When we start writing and toying with persuasive speech ideas, it’s natural to want to sound smart and use the biggest words we know. But as any great and effective communicator will tell you: Keeping it Simple is usually smarter! It's one of those speech writing tips that will get you far indeed.Some speeches sound like PhD dissertations and it's obvious that the author went out of their way to use the fanciest words imaginable then sprinkled it with some technical jargon and finally threw in a few cryptic acronyms for good measure.

But by using complex and obscure sentences, instead of simple, clear and direct language, you are usually extending and open invitation to your audience, to start daydreaming.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Lootifer on Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:43 pm

Easiest poll in history of CC polls.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Victor Sullivan on Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:51 pm

Hooray, bias!

-Sully
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Lootifer on Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:10 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:Hooray, bias!

-Sully

How is there any bias when there is only one correct answer?

Image
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Victor Sullivan on Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:51 pm

Aww, you're cute, Lootifer :D

-Sully
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby notyou2 on Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:09 pm

Michelle is way hotter and way smarter. This is a popularity contest isn't it? She would win the swimsuit competition too.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Michelle Obama vs Ann rMoney

Postby Lootifer on Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:49 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:Aww, you're cute, Lootifer :D

-Sully

Truth be told I usually loath posting lolcats, but in this case I felt it appropriate.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl