Moderator: Community Team
PLAYER57832 wrote:This pretty well takes the cake.
He has been blasting the healthcare reform act as "obamacare" and sworn it will be among the first things he will repeal..
BUT... his explanation for how he really does care for the 47%. for all Americans is that he instituted healthcare for all in Massachussettes!
If I did not already think the guy slime.. that would pretty much seal the deal.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Shouldn't Romney be praised for his healthcare system in MA?
I mean, many love the perceived benefits of Obamacare, but where's the love for MA's Romneycare?
BigBallinStalin wrote:Shouldn't Romney be praised for his healthcare system in MA?
I mean, many love the perceived benefits of Obamacare, but where's the love for MA's Romneycare?
rdsrds2120 wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Shouldn't Romney be praised for his healthcare system in MA?
I mean, many love the perceived benefits of Obamacare, but where's the love for MA's Romneycare?
Why should there be? Obamacare affects every state, Romneycare affects MA. There isn't going to be resounding praise for it outside of MA, and for understandable reasons.
BMO
BigBallinStalin wrote:But still, there's no praise for the idea of Romneycare!
This failure somewhat reflects how people tend to ignore the 'Democratic' policies of Republicans because it came from a "Republican."
Perhaps, eventually, people will realize the big charade of the Democratic v. Republican dichotomy, but that would require a giant hurdle over political marketing and silly mainstream media.
thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:This pretty well takes the cake.
He has been blasting the healthcare reform act as "obamacare" and sworn it will be among the first things he will repeal..
BUT... his explanation for how he really does care for the 47%. for all Americans is that he instituted healthcare for all in Massachussettes!
If I did not already think the guy slime.. that would pretty much seal the deal.
This isn't really new information and was one of the myriad of reasons why Republicans were looking for a different candidate in the primaries.
AndyDufresne wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:But still, there's no praise for the idea of Romneycare!
This failure somewhat reflects how people tend to ignore the 'Democratic' policies of Republicans because it came from a "Republican."
Perhaps, eventually, people will realize the big charade of the Democratic v. Republican dichotomy, but that would require a giant hurdle over political marketing and silly mainstream media.
BBS, keep talking like this and they'll have you executed (or at least frozen) for subversion.
--Andy
Symmetry wrote:Romney's 47%:
Army of GOD wrote:Symmetry wrote:Romney's 47%:
I guess his Alzheimer's made him forget that Mega Bloks suck ass.
BigBallinStalin wrote:(GIMP sucks. What's good, free picture editor?)
Phatscotty wrote:We know we know....any Republican who runs for office is insane. It is comical how the insanity must be shared with everyone, over and over and over and over and over again. That is a totally sane thing to do....right? I mean, I count 11 Romney threads on page 1
Totally sane
Army of GOD wrote:Symmetry wrote:Romney's 47%:
I guess his Alzheimer's made him forget that Mega Bloks suck ass.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
PLAYER57832 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:This pretty well takes the cake.
He has been blasting the healthcare reform act as "obamacare" and sworn it will be among the first things he will repeal..
BUT... his explanation for how he really does care for the 47%. for all Americans is that he instituted healthcare for all in Massachussettes!
If I did not already think the guy slime.. that would pretty much seal the deal.
This isn't really new information and was one of the myriad of reasons why Republicans were looking for a different candidate in the primaries.
That he had healthcare in Mass and yet was against Obamacare, sure.
However, this is much more blatently hypocritical than anything he has said before. Before it was mostly things like "states should decide". But, if he is going to claim this as a big triumph and demostration of how much he cares for kids.. then why doesn't he care for ALL kids, not just those in Mass.
Phatscotty wrote:You guys are listening to the words of politicians at the worst possible time.....
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:You guys are listening to the words of politicians at the worst possible time.....
In the run up to a major election?
You're losing it Scotty.
comic boy wrote:Somebody remind me how many Obama threads have been started by the Phat hypocrite
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users