Conquer Club

Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby Woodruff on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:46 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Yes, you guys are bent all out of shape over the dumbest crap, only seeking some kind of self-esteem reassurance building excersize and a convenient scapegoat for all your problems.


I love it when you say these things. It makes your lack of self-reflection so bloody apparent.


I'm sorry that you still don't understand, Woodruff.


I think it's humorous that you think I don't.

Phatscotty wrote:And I'm not buying into any of your bullshit either


Nor are you answering the questions I've asked of you.

Phatscotty wrote:Control your fear, Woodruff. It's never too late to change your attitudinal beliefs.


You're the one campaigning through your fear, Phatscotty. I have no problems at all campaigning for Jill Stein and Gary Johnson. You're too afraid of Obama to campaign for your actual (well, claimed anyway) beliefs.

Let go of your fear, Phatscotty.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby rdsrds2120 on Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:59 pm

DangerBoy wrote:Is hypocritic even a legitimitcal adverbative or is this another one of Player's uneducated hooked on phonics moments?

What about a Hippocratic high, Player?


legitimate*

Had to point out the irony there. Also,

I don't think it's an "outside of these forums". I think for me to fall within "moderate conservative", I would need to be "outside of the United States". I tend to think that these forums do UNFORTUNATELY reflect the same idiocy that the United States shows as far as what a conservative and a liberal are, which are very different from what those terms mean outside of the United States.


You forgot jay, though, I haven't seen him around much.

BMO
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:26 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.


...all on page 1......

btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?

However, there is actually a point to be made here. What all this shows is that Leftists are not defending any Obama policies, or even talking policy at all. They are taking the path of baselessly accusing everyone and anyone who does not vote for Obama of whatever is convenient at the time.

No, it just proves that more people have made Romney threads that Obama ones in the past few days, likely because Romney has been in the news for not just gaffs, but also things like releasing his tax returns. Obama has just been rather quiet for the past couple of weeks.


Yeah, Obama has been soooooo quiet recently......

where he admits he did not even know what the debt was. No gaffe there!


Media blackout






the first US ambassador to be murdered in 30 years, as well as other US servicemen...."just bumps in the road"
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby DangerBoy on Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:44 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:
DangerBoy wrote:Is hypocritic even a legitimitcal adverbative or is this another one of Player's uneducated hooked on phonics moments?

What about a Hippocratic high, Player?


legitimate*

Had to point out the irony there.


Wow, pretty tough to slip one by you there. (it couldn't possibly be intentional)
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DangerBoy
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:31 pm
Location: Nevada

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby Symmetry on Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:50 pm

DangerBoy wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
DangerBoy wrote:Is hypocritic even a legitimitcal adverbative or is this another one of Player's uneducated hooked on phonics moments?

What about a Hippocratic high, Player?


legitimate*

Had to point out the irony there.


Wow, pretty tough to slip one by you there. (it couldn't possibly be intentional)


Cool story bro.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby john9blue on Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:15 pm

i didn't think anyone would take "legitimitcal adverbative" seriously. i stand corrected.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby Timminz on Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:27 pm

When trolls troll trolls, they all think they've won, and they're all wrong.
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:32 pm

DangerBoy wrote:Is hypocritic even a legitimitcal adverbative or is this another one of Player's uneducated hooked on phonics moments?

What about a Hippocratic high, Player?

adjective, not adverb.

I would diagram it out, but I don't have the symbols/drawing technology here on this computer.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:34 pm

john9blue wrote:i'm considered one of the most conservative posters here and i'm a centrist.

You are only really conservative when it comes to religion... and to some extent, gender issues. (tied very much to religion)
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:37 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.


...all on page 1......

btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?

However, there is actually a point to be made here. What all this shows is that Leftists are not defending any Obama policies, or even talking policy at all. They are taking the path of baselessly accusing everyone and anyone who does not vote for Obama of whatever is convenient at the time.

No, it just proves that more people have made Romney threads that Obama ones in the past few days, likely because Romney has been in the news for not just gaffs, but also things like releasing his tax returns. Obama has just been rather quiet for the past couple of weeks.


Yeah, Obama has been soooooo quiet recently......

where he admits he did not even know what the debt was. No gaffe there!

The funny part is, I heard the WHOLE quotes... , and no, in context, they were not gaffs.. though the right did very much try to paint them as such.

At any rate, you are correct, Obama has been on the news. But posters have not seen fodder for threads. I mean, this one I made on Romney was the first on either candidate I have made in a long time.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby john9blue on Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:08 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
john9blue wrote:i'm considered one of the most conservative posters here and i'm a centrist.

You are only really conservative when it comes to religion... and to some extent, gender issues. (tied very much to religion)



religion isn't really a political issue, except for the religious right who wants minimal separation of church and state (but that's not me)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:09 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Timminz wrote:79. 79 threads that contain the word "Obama" in either the title or the first post.


...all on page 1......

btw, Pimpdave holds the record, with 113 Tea Party/Republican threads in less than 90 days. Did that bother you guys earlier this year?

However, there is actually a point to be made here. What all this shows is that Leftists are not defending any Obama policies, or even talking policy at all. They are taking the path of baselessly accusing everyone and anyone who does not vote for Obama of whatever is convenient at the time.

No, it just proves that more people have made Romney threads that Obama ones in the past few days, likely because Romney has been in the news for not just gaffs, but also things like releasing his tax returns. Obama has just been rather quiet for the past couple of weeks.


Yeah, Obama has been soooooo quiet recently......

where he admits he did not even know what the debt was. No gaffe there!

The funny part is, I heard the WHOLE quotes... , and no, in context, they were not gaffs.. though the right did very much try to paint them as such.

At any rate, you are correct, Obama has been on the news. But posters have not seen fodder for threads. I mean, this one I made on Romney was the first on either candidate I have made in a long time.


have you seen the one where Obama says he has been to 57 states! OMG how can you vote for that guy!!!!!

O:)
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby thegreekdog on Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:30 pm

Timminz wrote:When trolls troll trolls, they all think they've won, and they're all wrong.


Who trolls the trolls? I troll for thee... or whatever.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby john9blue on Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:42 pm

ask not for whom saxi trolls...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Romney.. hit new hypocritic high

Postby PLAYER57832 on Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:30 am

john9blue wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
john9blue wrote:i'm considered one of the most conservative posters here and i'm a centrist.

You are only really conservative when it comes to religion... and to some extent, gender issues. (tied very much to religion)



religion isn't really a political issue, except for the religious right who wants minimal separation of church and state (but that's not me)
I was referring more to discussions than politics. Religion does impact politics in that it shapes your values, your sense of what should be. That includes whether you believe other people have a right to disagree.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users