Moderator: Community Team
I never once went after the Day Cop. I did go after your previous incarnation, briefly, before you claimed. And hell, you didn't even really claim, only a semi-claim hinting that you might be a cop, and yet I still trusted you and voted Neutrino.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Or spin look back at the rest of the game and see whom Aimless was targeting (the day cop as well as a "later" mafia scum. He has claimed to be a forensics investigator as well as a lyncher. He changes his role more often than Britney Spears changes her underwear(she doesn't seem to wear any). Why would he have been targeting the day cop for so long and thought it was a good deal for the cop to give himself up to the scum in exchange for making a scum die. the cop is one of the most important roles for the town yet Aimless wanted him dead early on.
I hope you enjoyed reading it as much as I enjoyed writing it.willis wrote:I guess it was pretty cool......
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Mischaracterizing what I said is a scumtell.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:You told people that you were very suspicious of the day cop. You even admitted that it would be a good move for a cop to reveal himself at the cost of showing a scumbag. When called on it, you chose not to pursue going after the day cop b/c he claimed that if he in fact was wrong that he was willing to be lynched and upon being proven right was promptly killed off. No tears were shed by you for him dying and it would not have been surprising if you were in fact the one to choose to get me killed and conveniently blame it on the1excile whom is now dead and confirmed scum.
You realize that all three mafia outing themselves on the same day is absolutely stupid, right? If I were mafia, and if I were willing to sacrifice Exile to make myself look like a power role, it would be the absolute high of stupidity for Exile to pull the exact same stunt on nagerous. However, that stunt is exactly what Exile pulled against nagerous.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Going back and forth with the1excile over which one would go is something scummy to do while ensuring that the other would not look as suspicious to the rest of the townies like myself and spin.
This argument is called a wifom. It is generally bad form to base an accusation on a wifom, as you are as likely to fool yourself as you are to get things right. When wifom arguments are made, they are a sign that the arguer is scum and trying to confuse people; I've used them a couple of times in the past for sport, but both of those times I was scum.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It is not a guarantteed win b/c with you as scum that would make the scum win. While it would be highly unlikely that all 3 scums would do that on the same day, it would also be a good reason to in fact do it. Nobody would suspect that it would happen. When called on it the person would just easily point out how that would be stupid and nobody is that stupid to do it which would in fact be a good reason to do it.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.