Moderator: Community Team
samgrossy wrote:EBWOP
Obviously if mafia picked LSU to roleblock, they would know that he wasn't mafia. But they wouldn't have known he was a vig, able to kill one a mafia. So they may have just blindly picked LSU and said let's roleblock him and then kill him to give us the best chance of killing him.
1 on 1 trades are fine by me, as long as we don't have to lynch twice for it. Now that the vig is gone, I'm not so sure. If you have info you want to share, please share it, though. By saying this much you've practically already consented to do so. I'm interested in your role, since you appear to be able to investigate a group of people.chap wrote:Trying to think whether or not I want to share information that I have. It may be better to wait.
Tell me, what does everyone consider good odds for us to kill people? If we have two people and 1 is for sure town and one is anti-town, would agreeing to kill both be agreeable? I think it should be. What about if it's 3 people and 1 is anti-town and 2 are town? What percentages would you think are worth it?
chapcrap wrote:Trying to think whether or not I want to share information that I have. It may be better to wait.
Tell me, what does everyone consider good odds for us to kill people? If we have two people and 1 is for sure town and one is anti-town, would agreeing to kill both be agreeable? I think it should be. What about if it's 3 people and 1 is anti-town and 2 are town? What percentages would you think are worth it?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:LSU replaces Mr. S.
edocsil wrote:LSU replaces Mr. S.
chapcrap wrote:Trying to think whether or not I want to share information that I have. It may be better to wait.
Tell me, what does everyone consider good odds for us to kill people? If we have two people and 1 is for sure town and one is anti-town, would agreeing to kill both be agreeable? I think it should be. What about if it's 3 people and 1 is anti-town and 2 are town? What percentages would you think are worth it?
Victor Sullivan wrote:Fluff my muffins! I can't believe that.
-Sully
aage wrote:edocsil wrote:LSU replaces Mr. S.
So LSU, did you target anyone with your vig ability last night?
samgrossy wrote:aage wrote:edocsil wrote:LSU replaces Mr. S.
So LSU, did you target anyone with your vig ability last night?
I think that if LSU answers this question, it would be a severe breach of gameply rules. LSU v1.0 died last night and we can't ask a dead guy any questions. And, as I recall, Squirrel did not claim Vig.
samgrossy wrote:aage wrote:edocsil wrote:LSU replaces Mr. S.
So LSU, did you target anyone with your vig ability last night?
I think that if LSU answers this question, it would be a severe breach of gameply rules. LSU v1.0 died last night and we can't ask a dead guy any questions. And, as I recall, Squirrel did not claim Vig.
I am sure LSU won't answer it, but at the very least I think he SHOULDN'T answer this question.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Fluff my muffins! I can't believe that.
-Sully
Victor Sullivan wrote:nagerous wrote:Grasping at straws there Jak,
They're the bendy straws, though; they're worth grasping at.
Unvote vote gregwolf
-Sully
Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not really sure what you want? It's not like I can do much Day 1 aside from building pointless cases or taking sides on pointless cases. And I'm sure I'm not the only one posting what one might call "fluff". It's easy to be in the midst of things and seem like you're doing more than you are. I mean, many of you are trying way too hard to find something in that post of mine. I feel like that's evidence enough that we've yet again accomplished very little Day 1.
My whole thing is I'm simply stopping in to say, "hello," and let you all know I'm keeping track of the conversation. There's not much else to do without a little night action-action.
-Sully
Victor Sullivan wrote:I mean Day 2 there is more out there to verify/disprove claims. And my philosophy for voting inactives was for Day 1 only and only on the basis that I'd rather play against good players than with silent ones. You did vote for Iliad, did you not?
-Sully
Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh snappers! I must apologize, I forgot about this; I was busy over the end of last week and the weekend. Not that it particularly matters, since my vote was stolen anyway
I'll try to catch up. Seems to me I was taking heat yesterday, so I'll try to be quick-like! Thursdays I'm booked, but I'll see if I can't post something meaningful by Friday.
-Sully
Victor Sullivan wrote:Fluff my muffins! I can't believe that.
-Sully
edocsil wrote:For various reasons a final VC from yesterday was requested.
Jak (5) ~ shaggy, pcm, cm5, Sam, gregwolf
Vodean (1) ~ lsu
Iliad (2) ~ /, Fifth
gregwolf (12) ~ Saf, jonty, soundman, violet, aage, JG, Nag, DRoZ jak, ???, Strike, Vodean
chapcrap wrote:So, the part about I am wondering about is the ??? vote. Either way, I think it's valuable to get that information on a group of players. So, I'll be sharing.
jak111 wrote:chapcrap wrote:So, the part about I am wondering about is the ??? vote. Either way, I think it's valuable to get that information on a group of players. So, I'll be sharing.
I am curious, are you skimming, or are you forgetful? I had a stolen vote and it shows up as "???"... the fact that I need to explain this after I've been a known vote stealer is pretty bad.
Now, I want to hear about your anti town thing. Is it gut feeling or a power? If it's a power I can narrow down the list to:
Saf, jonty, soundman, aage, JG, Nag, DRoZ, Strike, Vodean
I know that's not a great decrease with only 3 voters gone, but if you say 4 of these are anti town we have targets to investigate and I have people to target for a missing vote
Now, if you can confirm it as a power, then we could try to clear 2-3 of the above with night actions last night and we will soon have a small amount of people left to get at.
blakebowling wrote:jak111 wrote:chapcrap wrote:So, the part about I am wondering about is the ??? vote. Either way, I think it's valuable to get that information on a group of players. So, I'll be sharing.
I am curious, are you skimming, or are you forgetful? I had a stolen vote and it shows up as "???"... the fact that I need to explain this after I've been a known vote stealer is pretty bad.
Now, I want to hear about your anti town thing. Is it gut feeling or a power? If it's a power I can narrow down the list to:
Saf, jonty, soundman, aage, JG, Nag, DRoZ, Strike, Vodean
I know that's not a great decrease with only 3 voters gone, but if you say 4 of these are anti town we have targets to investigate and I have people to target for a missing vote
Now, if you can confirm it as a power, then we could try to clear 2-3 of the above with night actions last night and we will soon have a small amount of people left to get at.
I do believe he was asking who the ??? vote shows up as. (i.e. If it would count as your alignment or the person whom it was stolen from's alignment, or neither)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users