Moderator: Community Team
Vote against Romney and Obama and save America.Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
He is voting for Romney, even though he claims that Johnson would make a better President. He's not interested in actually supporting his allegedly-beloved Tea Party by altering the stranglehold that the Repocrats have on our elections, because he's too enamored of the social agenda of the GOP.The Bison King wrote:Who are you voting for Scotty?
The person who bests represents my views AND has a realistic chance to win.The Bison King wrote:Who are you voting for Scotty?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Just curious, when you posted this, what was your purpose in doing so? Did you actually think it would change anyone's mind or affect anyone's thinking in any way besides adding to the annoyance of those who disagree with your brand of politics? Or were you just wanting to stir the pot and get people riled up?Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust


Because being on the winning team is more important than doing what is best for the nation.Phatscotty wrote:The person who bests represents my views AND has a realistic chance to win.The Bison King wrote:Who are you voting for Scotty?
Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
He does has your views. He, like you, flip flops like a fish in a boat. Yall both can't hold a stance for more than a week, so I'd say. DUH! Of course your gonna vote for Mitt.Phatscotty wrote:The person who bests represents my views AND has a realistic chance to win.The Bison King wrote:Who are you voting for Scotty?
That would be Mitt Romney. We already know Obama will not work with the Tea Party, he proved he would rather let America be downgraded 3 times in the last 14 months and play blame games than even so something as simple and necesary as pass a budget.

tzor wrote:You can easily tell the people who are into rational thought and those who are into the raw emotional whine.
Romney and the opposition political party in a significant majority and got things done.
Obama had a majority in the house and senate, barely got something through and blamed one person because one year later he would say that it was his duty to defeat him in 2012.
All thoughts of politcal argument aside, who would you rather have in charge.
Hell, I'd welcome Bill Clinton back over Obama.
Jimmy Carter is starting to look good right now.

It was because three people asked me the same question in about fifteen minutes... This should answer everyone.Ray Rider wrote:Just curious, when you posted this, what was your purpose in doing so? Did you actually think it would change anyone's mind or affect anyone's thinking in any way besides adding to the annoyance of those who disagree with your brand of politics? Or were you just wanting to stir the pot and get people riled up?Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
I'm not smoking anything i just have a different opinion and different priorities. Can you tolerate that?karel wrote:Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
ur funny,wtf are you smoking.............mitt is by far the worse choice anyone can make,cant trust a duche bag like him
What question was that? Sorry, I don't stalk you like Woodruff does so I don't know what question people are asking you. I'm asking because I'm genuinely curious what you hoped to gain by posting that. Would it at all influence your voting decision if you read a post by someone that said:Phatscotty wrote:It was because three people asked me the same question in about fifteen minutes... This should answer everyone.Ray Rider wrote:Just curious, when you posted this, what was your purpose in doing so? Did you actually think it would change anyone's mind or affect anyone's thinking in any way besides adding to the annoyance of those who disagree with your brand of politics? Or were you just wanting to stir the pot and get people riled up?Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
Why are you asking?
If so, how would it affect it?GenericLiberal wrote:It's all American's duty to give Romney the booty.
Vote against Romney and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust


I don't follow, but honestly, everyone, I have not slept in 10 days....4 hours a night tops, many nights 2 hours. Feel free to rephrase. I am going to take a bath now, something I have not done in probably 7 years. I am even going to add some bubbles and Alibabba aroma therapy.Ray Rider wrote:What question was that? Sorry, I don't stalk you like Woodruff does so I don't know what question people are asking you. I'm asking because I'm genuinely curious what you hoped to gain by posting that. Would it at all influence your voting decision if you read a post by someone that said:Phatscotty wrote:It was because three people asked me the same question in about fifteen minutes... This should answer everyone.Ray Rider wrote:Just curious, when you posted this, what was your purpose in doing so? Did you actually think it would change anyone's mind or affect anyone's thinking in any way besides adding to the annoyance of those who disagree with your brand of politics? Or were you just wanting to stir the pot and get people riled up?Phatscotty wrote:It's all American's duty to give Obama the booty.
Vote against Obama and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
Why are you asking?
If so, how would it affect it?GenericLiberal wrote:It's all American's duty to give Romney the booty.
Vote against Romney and save America.
Liberty
E. Pluribus Unum
In God We Trust
yes you have asked, yes I have made threads (plural) about it. I named at least 5, others have discovered many more.thegreekdog wrote:I feel like I've asked this question before, but...
COULD YOU PLEASE NAME FIVE REASONS WHY ROMNEY IS DIFFERENT THAN OBAMA
Let's make some wagers then if Romney wins.Phatscotty wrote:yes you have asked, yes I have made threads (plural) about it. I named at least 5, others have discovered many more.thegreekdog wrote:I feel like I've asked this question before, but...
COULD YOU PLEASE NAME FIVE REASONS WHY ROMNEY IS DIFFERENT THAN OBAMA
#1 Romney is not a Marixt![]()
If I may, please let me ask first. Why is it not as simple (for me) as..."which is better concerning the Tea Party? Romney? or Obama?"
Who can work with Congress to pass a budget? Regardless of who controls Congress? What is Obama's track record here? both when he had Democrat Majorities, and when he lost the house, but still has the Senate?
I believe Romney will work with Congress to pass a budget. My hopes are the Tea Party will win Congress, and finish kicking out all the BS Republicans.
Great, Phatscotty's finally gonna deliver...Phatscotty wrote:yes you have asked, yes I have made threads (plural) about it. I named at least 5, others have discovered many more.thegreekdog wrote:I feel like I've asked this question before, but...
COULD YOU PLEASE NAME FIVE REASONS WHY ROMNEY IS DIFFERENT THAN OBAMA
Oh. Yeah, that's right...it's Phatscotty.Phatscotty wrote:#1 Romney is not a Marixt![]()
If I may, please let me ask first. Why is it not as simple (for me) as..."which is better concerning the Tea Party? Romney? or Obama?"
Who can work with Congress to pass a budget? Regardless of who controls Congress? What is Obama's track record here? both when he had Democrat Majorities, and when he lost the house, but still has the Senate?
I believe Romney will work with Congress to pass a budget. My hopes are the Tea Party will win Congress, and finish kicking out all the BS Republicans.
i want to get in on this too, scotty.thegreekdog wrote:Let's make some wagers then if Romney wins.Phatscotty wrote:yes you have asked, yes I have made threads (plural) about it. I named at least 5, others have discovered many more.thegreekdog wrote:I feel like I've asked this question before, but...
COULD YOU PLEASE NAME FIVE REASONS WHY ROMNEY IS DIFFERENT THAN OBAMA
#1 Romney is not a Marixt![]()
If I may, please let me ask first. Why is it not as simple (for me) as..."which is better concerning the Tea Party? Romney? or Obama?"
Who can work with Congress to pass a budget? Regardless of who controls Congress? What is Obama's track record here? both when he had Democrat Majorities, and when he lost the house, but still has the Senate?
I believe Romney will work with Congress to pass a budget. My hopes are the Tea Party will win Congress, and finish kicking out all the BS Republicans.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Vote for Gary Johnson then. Get your tea-party buddies to vote for him. Get 99%ers and OWS-activists to vote for him.Phatscotty wrote:The person who bests represents my views AND has a realistic chance to win.The Bison King wrote:Who are you voting for Scotty?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.