Moderator: Community Team
2dimes wrote:Did you use a razor Symm or just a QuickClips job?
Symmetry wrote:2dimes wrote:Did you use a razor Symm or just a QuickClips job?
I have no preference while making myself a bald woman suit.
Symmetry wrote:Emotionally vulnerable young girls with a crush get conned. Excuse me if i find this less than a triumph for the internet age.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Symmetry wrote:Emotionally vulnerable young girls with a crush get conned. Excuse me if i find this less than a triumph for the internet age.
seriously. i'm not a fan of bieber but i don't get why supposedly "tolerant" people hate him and everything he stands for with such a passion.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
john9blue wrote:Symmetry wrote:Emotionally vulnerable young girls with a crush get conned. Excuse me if i find this less than a triumph for the internet age.
seriously. i'm not a fan of bieber but i don't get why supposedly "tolerant" people hate him and everything he stands for with such a passion.
MegaProphet wrote:john9blue wrote:Symmetry wrote:Emotionally vulnerable young girls with a crush get conned. Excuse me if i find this less than a triumph for the internet age.
seriously. i'm not a fan of bieber but i don't get why supposedly "tolerant" people hate him and everything he stands for with such a passion.
I've never had anything against him, but his fans are quite annoying. Though not enough to really deserve this
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Woodruff wrote:john9blue wrote:Symmetry wrote:Emotionally vulnerable young girls with a crush get conned. Excuse me if i find this less than a triumph for the internet age.
seriously. i'm not a fan of bieber but i don't get why supposedly "tolerant" people hate him and everything he stands for with such a passion.
Me either. That being said, the rumor is that he's quite the self-satisfied little jerk. So that could be part of it.
BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
There are unintended good consequences. I guess you're a glass half-empty kinda guy.
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
maxfaraday wrote:Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
What?
WHAT?????
Did you just compare justin bieber to The Beatles???????????????
FOED.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
Mr_Adams wrote:Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
I only report. I didn't do shit.
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:It's interesting because the actions of some of his fans reflect a very high price which they pay to express their value of Bieber. Part of that value could be attributed to feelings of showing cancer-solidarity, but I imagine it has more to do with trying to identify with Beiber in a more meaningful way.
Also, this event serves as an opportunity for those diehard fans to learn to question what they read and hear.
The kind of adolescent fandom among young girls experiencing their first crush ain't new. Beatlemania, Take That (in the UK), or any number of other crushes- it's part of growing up.
Exploiting teenage crushes for "lulz" seems crappy and cruel, especially if you're a 20 year old man like Mr Adams.
There are unintended good consequences. I guess you're a glass half-empty kinda guy.
Troll on, BBS.
Symmetry wrote:Your defense of a troll site getting a bunch of adolescent girls to shave their heads for your amusement, or as some kind of benefit to their own self-worth indicates trolling.
That's more indicative of a soul half-empty attitude regarding your good self.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:Your defense of a troll site getting a bunch of adolescent girls to shave their heads for your amusement, or as some kind of benefit to their own self-worth indicates trolling.
That's more indicative of a soul half-empty attitude regarding your good self.
I already explained what I found interesting about this, so if you read that, then you'd realize that your allegations are groundless.
How is being interested in the role of prices (and incentives) of this situation and mentioning a positive unintended consequence equal defending this plan by a few individuals?
(And focusing only on costs does not produce useful analysis, nor does wrongly accusing me of trolling and (un)intentionally misconstruing my position contribute in any beneficial sense. Therefore, you're still being a glass half-empty person).
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users