Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Should NASA turn Voyager I around and bring it back to Earth?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 12868
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by saxitoxin »

I read the other day that Voyager I will run out of gas in 2025. That's just 23 years away.

Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth? It probably cost a lot of money to build. If we get it back, they can gas it up and send it the other direction to see if whatever they're looking for is over there. Otherwise it will have been a total waste.

Mets?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
nietzsche
Posts: 4587
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by nietzsche »

saxitoxin wrote:I read the other day that Voyager I will run out of gas in 2025. That's just 23 years away.

Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth? It probably cost a lot of money to build. If we get it back, we can gas it up and send it the other direction to see what's over there. Otherwise it will have been a total waste.

Mets?
That's not how it works.. Saving money is not the work of the government. It's better for everyone at NASA to get more money to build a new one.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
Funkyterrance
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Funkyterrance »

I vote send it back on the notion that littering space, like anywhere else, is low class.
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 12868
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by saxitoxin »

What if NASA just sent it back halfway, like to Jupiter - sent something to meet it there and gas it up, then turned it around and let it go back again? They'd lose a little time having to backtrack, so that's a possible drawback.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 12868
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by saxitoxin »

WHAAA?!?! SAXI, WTF?
Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 12868
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by saxitoxin »

I heard they've stowed a rotissirie chicken aboard Voyager. Would like to get it back.
Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
x-raider
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:32 am
Location: Lost in the Complexities of the Undiscovered Universe

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by x-raider »

...Looks for option labeled "they should join star-fleet"...

It's a hilarious premise that leads to pictures of rotisserie chickens that look like tigers...

Did they even equip it with a turn-around button?
User avatar
Funkyterrance
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Funkyterrance »

saxitoxin wrote:What if NASA just sent it back halfway, like to Jupiter - sent something to meet it there and gas it up, then turned it around and let it go back again? They'd lose a little time having to backtrack, so that's a possible drawback.
Wouldn't the thing they built to go to Jupiter cost nearly as much to build as the old one? Even if it didn't, it would be fueling up something that would be pretty obsolete by that point. In fact, the first one is probably already obsolete. Send the old one back and recycle it to make a brand new, state of the art waste of money.
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6427
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by notyou2 »

Turn it around and fly it into the sun.
Image
User avatar
Funkyterrance
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Funkyterrance »

saxitoxin wrote:I heard they've stowed a rotissirie chicken aboard Voyager. Would like to get it back.
Image
Kitty!
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6619
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Metsfanmax »

saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
User avatar
Funkyterrance
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Funkyterrance »

Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6619
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Metsfanmax »

Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.
maxfaraday
Posts: 272
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by maxfaraday »

Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.
They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.
From: Karl_R_Kroenen
To: maxfaraday

I have noted this post and if it continues, there will be consequences for you.
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6619
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Metsfanmax »

maxfaraday wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.
They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.
Solar panel technology barely existed in 1977.
User avatar
dyrtydog
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: central Florida

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by dyrtydog »

This story has already been written. Vgr will send out signals while broken on an alien planet, and Kirk and crew will investigate this "god" only to discover it was Voyager 1
Image
User avatar
Funkyterrance
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Funkyterrance »

maxfaraday wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.
They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.
Even solar panels have a lifespan.
User avatar
dyrtydog
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: central Florida

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by dyrtydog »

not if they were made of Twinkies
Image
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28364
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Dukasaur »

dyrtydog wrote:This story has already been written. Vgr will send out signals while broken on an alien planet, and Kirk and crew will investigate this "god" only to discover it was Voyager 1
Finally, someone points out the obvious!
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Timminz »

Who are we trying to trap here?
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6427
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by notyou2 »

Trekkies and it's working.
Image
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13186
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

Timminz wrote:Who are we trying to trap here?
Andy.
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 12868
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by saxitoxin »

Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
!!!!!!!!!!!TRAP THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SAXI TRAPPED METSFANMAX!

OH YEAH, SAXI'S THE GREATEST! SAXI'S THE GREATEST!

Image

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
nietzsche
Posts: 4587
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by nietzsche »

hahaha
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Post by Phatscotty »

Metsfanmax wrote:
maxfaraday wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote: Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?
No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."
Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?
Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.
They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.
Solar panel technology barely existed in 1977.
But it will solve all our problems in 2013
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”