dyrtydog wrote:thanks, but it is not JUST ME ! its everybody
dyrtydog wrote:On this particular date where I received all 3's, so did other of his former clan mates
Funkyterrance wrote:greenoaks wrote:seems legit to me.
What does? The report or kuma's explanation?
puppydog85 wrote:No, the problem is that the ratings have developed into something other that what the rules state. Someone with a 3 star rating is viewed as a total jerk, not average. Most people view a 5 star rating as normal, not exceptional.
I think the explanations should be changed to reflect the common practice on this site.
Re: kuma32478 [pending] BG
Post by kuma32478 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:58 am
I rate based on the descriptions of the ratings. 5 stars means excellent. 3 stars is average. Why is average considered bad?
afroaction wrote:Aba 1 star sore loser & quitter, doesn't miss a turn or say anything.
Users browsing this forum: Jdsizzleslice