That's fair comment, I'll avoid taking the bait.Metsfanmax wrote:You don't need to ask. Just stop responding.Symmetry wrote:I've asked, so we'll see.Metsfanmax wrote:Can you guys just stop, please?
Moderator: Community Team
That's fair comment, I'll avoid taking the bait.Metsfanmax wrote:You don't need to ask. Just stop responding.Symmetry wrote:I've asked, so we'll see.Metsfanmax wrote:Can you guys just stop, please?
I ain't proud of taking the bait.thegreekdog wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3948590Symmetry wrote:Alright dude, you're baiting, but tell me what you need me to reply to.thegreekdog wrote:What a turn of events! You deemed them worthy of reply two days ago. And lo and behold, when I post significant additional and different points you won't respond? For shame...Symmetry wrote:I believe your main points with regards to me are that I'm either a "troll" or a "moron". They don't seem like they're points worthy of reply.thegreekdog wrote:You should spend less time bumping and gloating and more time answering my points in two other threads.Symmetry wrote:Thought I might bump this one-
Just in case anyone is surprised that a man running for national office saying that he doesn't care about half of the country didn't win a national election.
This will be my only gloating, promise, and I have a bit of liberal guilt about it too.
538 was spot on.BigBallinStalin wrote:Didn't 538 predict last year's outcome accurately?GreecePwns wrote:Night Strike, always question your sources.
Unskewed Polls is affiliated with QStarNews, a website with plenty of political articles, almost all of which are pro-GOP Examiner articles (read: blogs), some of which border on tin-foil-hat territory.
Unskewed? Don't think so. Credible? Also don't think so. 538 is a very credible poll compiling site in comparison.
Tangent: the results of a poll don't only reflect voter preferences--in some cases.
For example, if a poll, which has been deemed reliable and accurate, posts its results, the observation of these results may sway people's opinions further---even if the results of that poll were actually inaccurate.
Meh, he didn't call you a troll or a moron, he civilly (although sarcastically) tried to get you to continue the discussion which had lasted for a while and where you had been repeatedly corrected. Nothing wrong with that, and I wouldn't call it baiting.Symmetry wrote:I ain't proud of taking the bait.thegreekdog wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3948590Symmetry wrote:Alright dude, you're baiting, but tell me what you need me to reply to.thegreekdog wrote:What a turn of events! You deemed them worthy of reply two days ago. And lo and behold, when I post significant additional and different points you won't respond? For shame...Symmetry wrote:I believe your main points with regards to me are that I'm either a "troll" or a "moron". They don't seem like they're points worthy of reply.thegreekdog wrote:
You should spend less time bumping and gloating and more time answering my points in two other threads.


Oh he did, in the thread he was baiting me to return to. But yes, probably not as explosive as the stuff that got BBS a ban for polling users on my death,Ray Rider wrote:Meh, he didn't call you a troll or a moron, he civilly (although sarcastically) tried to get you to continue the discussion which had lasted for a while and where you had been repeatedly corrected. Nothing wrong with that, and I wouldn't call it baiting.Symmetry wrote:I ain't proud of taking the bait.thegreekdog wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3948590Symmetry wrote:
Alright dude, you're baiting, but tell me what you need me to reply to.
And Metsfanmix, this isn't nearly as bad as when BBS and Symmetry go at it...
I'd say given the slowly improving economy in the swing states, it was gonna be hard for Romney to win even without dem gaffes.Symmetry wrote:But anyway, back on topic, I think the 47% video probably marked the beginning of the end.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Wait, BBS got a ban?Symmetry wrote:Oh he did, in the thread he was baiting me to return to. But yes, probably not as explosive as the stuff that got BBS a ban for polling users on my death,Ray Rider wrote:Meh, he didn't call you a troll or a moron, he civilly (although sarcastically) tried to get you to continue the discussion which had lasted for a while and where you had been repeatedly corrected. Nothing wrong with that, and I wouldn't call it baiting.Symmetry wrote:I ain't proud of taking the bait.thegreekdog wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3948590Symmetry wrote:
Alright dude, you're baiting, but tell me what you need me to reply to.
And Metsfanmix, this isn't nearly as bad as when BBS and Symmetry go at it...
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.