Moderator: Community Team
ManBungalow wrote:Noticeably female, that is.
Symmetry wrote:ManBungalow wrote:Noticeably female, that is.
I didn't think it'd be long before the opponents of Paul turned up.
ManBungalow wrote:Noticeably female, that is.
*the bracket should only include the year of inauguration, not the term in office or otherwise.
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:ManBungalow wrote:Noticeably female, that is.
I didn't think it'd be long before the opponents of Paul turned up.
I don't think we've ever had a president named Paul.ManBungalow wrote:Noticeably female, that is.
*the bracket should only include the year of inauguration, not the term in office or otherwise.
I can't think of any potential candidates right now. It looks like the early word from Republicans are the candidates will be all male.
oVo wrote:I think Hilary's window of opportunity has passed and I'm not sure it's something she's interested in any more. Don't see anyone else on the horizon that looks like a viable candidate, so it may be awhile before this happens.
Symmetry wrote:oVo wrote:I think Hilary's window of opportunity has passed and I'm not sure it's something she's interested in any more. Don't see anyone else on the horizon that looks like a viable candidate, so it may be awhile before this happens.
To be noticeably female? I think one of us misunderstood this thread.
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:oVo wrote:I think Hilary's window of opportunity has passed and I'm not sure it's something she's interested in any more. Don't see anyone else on the horizon that looks like a viable candidate, so it may be awhile before this happens.
To be noticeably female? I think one of us misunderstood this thread.
I could understand your trolling if Phatscotty or me created this thread, but why oVo? Do you dislike his avatar?
I think it's before 2030 that this happens, but not in 2016.
Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:oVo wrote:I think Hilary's window of opportunity has passed and I'm not sure it's something she's interested in any more. Don't see anyone else on the horizon that looks like a viable candidate, so it may be awhile before this happens.
To be noticeably female? I think one of us misunderstood this thread.
I could understand your trolling if Phatscotty or me created this thread, but why oVo? Do you dislike his avatar?
I think it's before 2030 that this happens, but not in 2016.
Who do you think created this thread?
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:oVo wrote:I think Hilary's window of opportunity has passed and I'm not sure it's something she's interested in any more. Don't see anyone else on the horizon that looks like a viable candidate, so it may be awhile before this happens.
To be noticeably female? I think one of us misunderstood this thread.
I could understand your trolling if Phatscotty or me created this thread, but why oVo? Do you dislike his avatar?
I think it's before 2030 that this happens, but not in 2016.
Who do you think created this thread?
ManB - even worse!
Symmetry wrote:
So back on topic, which candidates do you think are "noticeably female" at the moment?
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
2dimes wrote:Looks like the Romney loss has been a rough go at the McMutton house hold.
CreepersWiener wrote:Symmetry wrote:
So back on topic, which candidates do you think are "noticeably female" at the moment?
Probably one of these young ladies will make it to the POTUS.
My money would be on Chelsea.
thegreekdog wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:Symmetry wrote:
So back on topic, which candidates do you think are "noticeably female" at the moment?
Probably one of these young ladies will make it to the POTUS.
My money would be on Chelsea.
Um... in that last picture... does GW Bush have a red eye??!?!?!
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: bigtoughralf