patches70 wrote:I'm not sure what you are going on about. Why are you mixing my quotes with someone else's? See, this is my quote-Such a group to be able to operate would require a complacent and ignorant populace. Would it not?
I was just asking a question of Lion, nothing more.
And what is this about?2dimes wrote:So a person who acts like they know what's going on shows up. Instead of explaining things properly to the rest of us or doing something in real life, they rant online that everyone who doesn't blindly agree with them is a sheep.
Your post makes no sense, what are you talking about and who are you talking to?
I just asked some questions is all. What's wrong with that? You are talking about rants and then go on to rant yourself. What's up with that?
Just askin' is all.
I seperated them, I was talking to anyone and no one in particular, intetionally using an example of someone seperate that thinks they know more than you, but removed the names because as I tried to explain, I did not want to implicate you, while I wanted to adress the concept you brought up and point out someone else who is not you, acted like they are not ignorant and complacent yet certainly in no way intended to help those of us he feels are.
If I wanted to either challenge or support something you wrote I would have left your name in the quotes. As I wrote.
I thought you would able to tell the difference between what you wrote and what was written by another member without names. You seem intelligent, I don't think the other poster does.I think you are fairly well informed about this, certainly as much as possible for a regular person.
I apologise if you can't follow the structure because of the way I wrote it.