Moderator: Clan Directors
Chariot of Fire wrote:From experience I can tell you that Lx runs the best tournies on the site and this TLO V has great appeal. It's also been carefully planned and lot of effort has been put into covering every detail. With the NC Cup (for the newer clans) and a lot of abstentions (it seems) from CC4 then there's definitely scope to run a competition like this concurrently.
I do have one question Rob. Why have a maximum number of players that can participate? I can understand the need for a minimum, but by placing a ceiling on the number I would have to tell a couple of guys in my clan "We're joining TLO V but sorry mate, you can't play". That doesn't seem right. Have I misread something or is this really the rule? Cheers
Chariot of Fire wrote:Ah OK, gotcha, thanks. So if the ceiling was raised and we could involve all clan members you would have to introduce some criteria to award achievement medals to just 16 of them, e.g. for best win % after a reaching a minimum number of games, e.g. 6. ??
benga wrote:one more thing is this for officers only?
I would just like to hear from other clans as well that they feel that the ceiling should be raised.
BGtheBrain wrote:TNC would do this.
Lindax wrote:Every player has to play at least 1 game per round and cannot play more than 6 games a round. A player can play a maximum of 2 games in every category: doubles, triples, quads, home games, away games. In other words, a player cannot play 3 doubles and 3 home games, for example.
josko.ri wrote:I think you have good idea, but wrong timing. CL5 Phase 2 will soon start, CC4 will soon start so more interest for your tournament would be if you start it in August/September, when 24/32 clans from CC4 will be eliminated and when probably more than half of clans will already be out of competition for top places in CL5.
Foxglove wrote:Nice tournament idea, Lindax.Lindax wrote:Every player has to play at least 1 game per round and cannot play more than 6 games a round. A player can play a maximum of 2 games in every category: doubles, triples, quads, home games, away games. In other words, a player cannot play 3 doubles and 3 home games, for example.
Why do you have the requirement that every player has to play at least 1 game per round? It will mean that anytime a person wants to sit out a round for vacation reasons (or whatever else), the player list will have to be altered. Was that your intention?
Lindax wrote:chapcrap wrote:What research led you to the date? If you did the research ahead, wouldn't you know who was eligible? It is irritating that I can't even bring this forward to my clan. By the time this starts, we'll have finished 10 clan wars and be ranked in the top 10. How is that not established? Not only that, the redundancy of the requirements is why I'm questioning. If you have been an active clan since January 1, 2001, then they would have 4 wars because you have to have that many in that time to be considered active.
This is why I ask you how you come to your criteria. Because I don't think you is the research and I think that the restrictions shouldn't have been allowed.
Well, I'm terribly sorry you feel "irritated". Fortunately I'm not running this tournament through the Tournament Department , so I don't have to answer to you.
As far as I'm concerned you have 3 options:
- You can join a clan that's eligible if you're so desperate to play in my tournament.
- You can file a complaint with the Clan Department.
- You can take it like a man and join the next edition.
Whatever you choose to do, stop spamming my clan tournament thread with your petty complaints.
Lx
Keefie wrote:The only entry criteria that HH don't meet is that we weren't formed until Sept/Oct 2011. If this is relaxed at all then we would love to participate.
HardAttack wrote:Good luck Lx, i know i will sound bitter, my usual, this handicap system is a no sense if you ask me ...
F400 is there to show the strength differences between clans, and you are using this scoring to create new measures (handicap) to show/see if clan A is even better than what it shows in F400, and if the clan B is not as strong as where it shows in F400. Well, maybe i am wrong, but my very honest opinion, you are equalizing competing clans via giving weak clans additional win points by start of the battle. Then say if a clan say in 20th position in F400 ranking wins, how are we going to see it ? TLO CLAN version winner, "with handicapping" note added. Not any explainatory, but blurry IMO.
Anyway, i missed thousands so far, and this might be a new one i m missing something again maybe.
Have fun.
cheers.
Lindax wrote:HardAttack wrote:Good luck Lx, i know i will sound bitter, my usual, this handicap system is a no sense if you ask me ...
F400 is there to show the strength differences between clans, and you are using this scoring to create new measures (handicap) to show/see if clan A is even better than what it shows in F400, and if the clan B is not as strong as where it shows in F400. Well, maybe i am wrong, but my very honest opinion, you are equalizing competing clans via giving weak clans additional win points by start of the battle. Then say if a clan say in 20th position in F400 ranking wins, how are we going to see it ? TLO CLAN version winner, "with handicapping" note added. Not any explainatory, but blurry IMO.
Anyway, i missed thousands so far, and this might be a new one i m missing something again maybe.
Have fun.
cheers.
You're not missing anything mate. And I can't help it if you don't like the format of my tournament. Luckily nobody forces you to join.
Lx
Users browsing this forum: No registered users