Moderator: Clan Directors
BGtheBrain wrote:Will the seeding # be equal to half the # of entrants or is it locked at 16?
mcshanester29 wrote:In the Clan Wars section it shows 12hr fog rule
but in the misc it says that it won't be enforced and is a gentleman's agreement, just curious which one it will be?
Doc_Brown wrote:If there are less than 33 entrants, what are the scheduling plans for AFOS and TOFU?
chemefreak wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:If there are less than 33 entrants, what are the scheduling plans for AFOS and TOFU?
We are not going to guess. If it happens, we will deal with it. We do remember our assurances to those two clans that we will not have them playing early in the tournament due to their commitments to the CCup3.
shoop76 wrote:chemefreak wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:If there are less than 33 entrants, what are the scheduling plans for AFOS and TOFU?
We are not going to guess. If it happens, we will deal with it. We do remember our assurances to those two clans that we will not have them playing early in the tournament due to their commitments to the CCup3.
You say playing early in the tournament. This means they will still have a bye or their 1st round matchup will be delayed?
patrickaa317 wrote:Were PM's sent to all clan leaders for all clans that have not signed up yet? Just want to make sure some of the less active clans are aware of this.
Any players can play in the tie-breaker games in the semi finals and finals even if they have already played in their allotted number of games for that clan war, however, no player can play in more than 2 of the games. Maps cannot be reused in the tie breaker games.
Genoke wrote:31 clans and 16 are seeded....
what happens when we can't find 48 clans to join with a start bracket of 32?
less seedings, another bracket or...something else?
Deliberately timing out in Escalating and Nuclear games to avoid taking a spoil will not be tolerated by any players.
This is not a common occurrence and we do not expect to see it happen at all but a rule should be in place to prevent abuse.
If a team breaks this rule the game must be re-made. (unless the wronged clan want the game to stand)
If a clan repeatedly breaks the rule then an escalating scale of punishment will apply.
IcePack wrote:And nukes? I posted earlier...
eddie2 wrote:I see it says no beta manual speed and freestyle.
eddie2 wrote:So are you allowing unlimited forts?
chemefreak wrote:32 clans have signed up. So all the what-ifs are moot.
Doc_Brown wrote:chemefreak wrote:32 clans have signed up. So all the what-ifs are moot.
Actually, this is only true if one more clan signs up. With 32, no play-in round is required. All 16 seeded clans would be expected to play in the opening round unless something changes with the structure. [/pedant]
chemefreak wrote:we can hire one of those lottery girls to draw names out of a box of bouncing balls...I actually like this option! Think Admin will pay for it
Doc_Brown wrote:chemefreak wrote:32 clans have signed up. So all the what-ifs are moot.
Actually, this is only true if one more clan signs up. With 32, no play-in round is required. All 16 seeded clans would be expected to play in the opening round unless something changes with the structure. [/pedant]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users