Moderator: Community Team
machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
SaMejoHn wrote:machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
I dont understand why everyone is so worked up..I dont think the conqueror title or medal was ever meant to be an indicator of who's the best player on CC. It is merely a title for whoever is on top of the scoreboard. What difference does it make if someone got to that status in 400 games or in 4,000 games or whatever other number.
Foxglove wrote:SaMejoHn wrote:machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
I dont understand why everyone is so worked up..I dont think the conqueror title or medal was ever meant to be an indicator of who's the best player on CC. It is merely a title for whoever is on top of the scoreboard. What difference does it make if someone got to that status in 400 games or in 4,000 games or whatever other number.
YES. +1. Like. Stumble. Digg. Upvote.
I'm always astonished by the sheer number of whiny posts that are made complaining about whomever happens to be the conqueror, and I can never understand why so many people ascribe such a long list made-up meanings to the conqueror symbol.
Here's what the conqueror symbol means:
1. The player has the most points out of all of the active players on CC.
That's it!
It doesn't mean any of the following things, no matter how fervently people seem to wish it so:
1. The player is the best CC player IN THE WORLD!!!!$!#!
2. The player is the best CC player at every possible setting!!
3. The player is obligated to play whomever wishes to challenge him or her.
4. The player has super-shiny unobtanium medals in every category!!
5. The player is a beacon of moral light in the seedy CC world.
6. The player is well-spoken and entertaining in the forums.
7. The player has won every game with the fairest and most random of settings, against any and every possible opponent.
8. The player 'deserves' the symbol, according to the whims of GD posters.
Phew. I think that's it.
machrs wrote:Hey... Wow!!! Peeps sure get worked up when you throw out a bone...I will never be Conqueror...nor would i want it ...I thought it was odd that you can play just 4 maps..only play with the top rated players...and get the top rank...I just thought Conqueror of this Club should be a True Conqueror...or just get rid of it....its all good no whining here...just gave an opinion...and thats it.....I dont want to get anyone's Panties in a bunch!!! thats for sure!!! ..peace
Foxglove wrote:No worries! My panties are smooth and silky, no bunching here.
SaMejoHn wrote:machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
I dont understand why everyone is so worked up..I dont think the conqueror title or medal was ever meant to be an indicator of who's the best player on CC. It is merely a title for whoever is on top of the scoreboard. What difference does it make if someone got to that status in 400 games or in 4,000 games or whatever other number.
Funkyterrance wrote:SaMejoHn wrote:machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
I dont understand why everyone is so worked up..I dont think the conqueror title or medal was ever meant to be an indicator of who's the best player on CC. It is merely a title for whoever is on top of the scoreboard. What difference does it make if someone got to that status in 400 games or in 4,000 games or whatever other number.
If it's such a meaningless title we should just get rid of it then.
machrs wrote:Hey... Wow!!! Peeps sure get worked up when you throw out a bone...I will never be Conqueror...nor would i want it ...I thought it was odd that you can play just 4 maps..only play with the top rated players...and get the top rank...I just thought Conqueror of this Club should be a True Conqueror...or just get rid of it....its all good no whining here...just gave an opinion...and thats it.....I dont want to get anyone's Panties in a bunch!!! thats for sure!!! ..peace
iAmCaffeine wrote:How hard can it be to archive a conqueror?
iAmCaffeine wrote:How hard can it be to archive a conqueror?
demonfork wrote:Since it's so easy you should throw your hat in the ring and become our next top dog.
iAmCaffeine wrote:demonfork wrote:Since it's so easy you should throw your hat in the ring and become our next top dog.
Whoosh!
demonfork wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:demonfork wrote:Since it's so easy you should throw your hat in the ring and become our next top dog.
Whoosh!
Actually you are utterly clueless and have no idea how incredibly hard it ALREADY is to become Conqueror. The fact that you think it needs to be harder shows your ignorance.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users