- as stated
- The newest games are listed first when anyone is looking for games
- worst game types end up timing out
- best games get picked up first
- end the need to scroll to the back of the list
Moderator: Community Team
I agree. Older games should be listed first.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
me agrees too.chapcrap wrote:I agree. Older games should be listed first.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
Yes, this I could support.SirSebstar wrote:me agrees too.chapcrap wrote:I agree. Older games should be listed first.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
I'd like to modify the suggestion to be, show those games that have the least persons missing, aka have the most games filled.
that way the 8 player quad where team1 is totally filled will not be a farmers paradise as it is now
um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
It is not a great idea when these games are dropped by the system, because then that kind of games will almost never be filled and so you can't play these kind of games without making it a private game and inviting people.shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
I don't like this suggestion, because as stated once a game falls of the first page, it is unlikely that it would fill. I do think a mechanism to reduce the number of currently waiting games would be nice though.shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, great idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
Umm, actually awful idea because games don't get dropped unless they are private. So, none of those games would be 'timed-out'shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
Are you sure? Since I never have seen a public game waiting around for more then 15 days.chapcrap wrote:Umm, actually awful idea because games don't get dropped unless they are private. So, none of those games would be 'timed-out'shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
Yes. They sit there until they are joined or dropped.Forza AZ wrote:Are you sure? Since I never have seen a public game waiting around for more then 15 days.chapcrap wrote:Umm, actually awful idea because games don't get dropped unless they are private. So, none of those games would be 'timed-out'shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
So let the shit games sit there. If they are a poor format, then they should waste away, rather thhan being b reathed life on page one.chapcrap wrote:Yes. They sit there until they are joined or dropped.Forza AZ wrote:Are you sure? Since I never have seen a public game waiting around for more then 15 days.chapcrap wrote:Umm, actually awful idea because games don't get dropped unless they are private. So, none of those games would be 'timed-out'shanksdigs wrote:um, actually, grate idea. those games that don't fill will be dropped by the system as they get timed-out. Seems like new players will join the newest games, not the ones that have been sitting around the longest.Forza AZ wrote:Bad idea, because this way a lot of games will never fill. People tend to join the top games earlier then the bottom games.
spiesr wrote:IMPLEMENTED

spiesr wrote:IMPLEMENTED


Doesn't matter much and I believe that was by design anyway. Speeders are a different animal.chapcrap wrote:Just as a note, this isn't working for speed games. Although, that probably doesn't matter as much.