Moderator: Community Team
I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
Wow, loutil called that perfectly didn't he? hahahahah!BigBallinStalin wrote:Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
loutil: 1
Woodruff: 0
I wonder if his head will explode if I fail to respond to his remark?Phatscotty wrote:the trap is set
D.T.A.
Give Woodruff the credit, I think he was joking?BigBallinStalin wrote:Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
loutil: 1
Woodruff: 0
It's funny that you guys think that's not exactly why I responded like that. Duh.patches70 wrote:Wow, loutil called that perfectly didn't he? hahahahah!BigBallinStalin wrote:Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
loutil: 1
Woodruff: 0
I wonder if you'll ever pull your balls out of your purse long enough to actually discuss the topic instead of playing the troll.loutil wrote:I wonder if his head will explode if I fail to respond to his remark?Phatscotty wrote:the trap is set
D.T.A.![]()
![]()
Jokes are supposed to be funny, so that isn't likelynietzsche wrote:Give Woodruff the credit, I think he was joking?BigBallinStalin wrote:Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
loutil: 1
Woodruff: 0
Fool me once and you are a fool. Fool me twice and I am the fool...Woodruff wrote:I wonder if you'll ever pull your balls out of your purse long enough to actually discuss the topic instead of playing the troll.loutil wrote:I wonder if his head will explode if I fail to respond to his remark?Phatscotty wrote:the trap is set
D.T.A.![]()
![]()
And anyway can pose as if they didn't mean to say such things--after being called out on it. Given Woodruff's history of bad 'jokes' and rampant logical fallacies, he only gets credit for being his cantankerous, illogical self.Phatscotty wrote:Jokes are supposed to be funny, so that isn't likelynietzsche wrote:Give Woodruff the credit, I think he was joking?BigBallinStalin wrote:Haha,Woodruff wrote:Well at least you were enough of an arrogant, entitled asshole to bother making an off-topic post to tell me. So you've got that going for you, buttercup.loutil wrote:I would engage this conversation but I have found that disagreeing with you only leads to ad hominen attacks...Woodruff wrote:Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
loutil: 1
Woodruff: 0
So I guess your answer is "no". And if that was your idea of honest discussion, then you are a fool. You're just a less-effective Phatscotty...which is quite a feat in itself.loutil wrote:Fool me once and you are a fool. Fool me twice and I am the fool...Woodruff wrote:I wonder if you'll ever pull your balls out of your purse long enough to actually discuss the topic instead of playing the troll.loutil wrote:I wonder if his head will explode if I fail to respond to his remark?Phatscotty wrote:the trap is set
D.T.A.![]()
![]()
I attempted honest discussion with you once. You chose to make personal attacks even though you do not even know me.
ftfyWoodruff wrote:So back to the topic...Interesting article on the future of the Internet:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... f-internet
I agree with his analysis. I think the future of the Internet is to be segregated as each government player takes control of what they can.
And if you disagree, then you're an idiot.
And if you don't wish to argue with me because I'll throw my ad hominems at you, then f*ck you, you're a foolish troll.
The freaking Japanese, man...AndyDufresne wrote:The future of the internet can be found here: A Penis-Powered Controller. Think of the multiplayer connectivity.
--Andy
Already happened.qwert wrote:are you think its possible of balkanization of USA ?

really?notyou2 wrote:Already happened.qwert wrote:are you think its possible of balkanization of USA ?
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Are you saying you balk at the use of balkanization here?GreecePwns wrote:The word Balkanization has nothing to do with the Internet and is being used incorrectly here.