Moderator: Community Team
TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
Butters1919 wrote:I'm not going anywhere. That was a rant of anger that should have been allowed to chill for an evening!
Gillipig, your side is the least appealing side available.
nàme wrote:The thing that makes Battle Royales special is that they are rare. Personally, I think they made too many last time they did it, despite me participating in many and even winning one. The person who won the first ever Battle Royale must have felt really special, and he is, because he was the only one and it was the first. Now, it's not so exclusive anymore. To be able to make them at will would destroy the purpose, especially if it was left exclusive to those who were in the game.
Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
Yeah don't worry, Woodruff tends to leave out details. A lot of details.
Woodruff wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
I'm going to go ahead and call you a liar (perhaps you'd like to prove me wrong?), because I'm always more than happy to point it out. Here you go:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=535&t=73328
Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
I'm going to go ahead and call you a liar (perhaps you'd like to prove me wrong?), because I'm always more than happy to point it out. Here you go:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=535&t=73328
Thanks for the link. It's a "meh" suggestion to me. Nothing wrong with it, but unimportant. I think if you have so many foes that you don't remember who they are, you might consider changing your criteria.
Dukasaur wrote:And here was your first opportunity to have enlightened me: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=141615&start=45#p3095413
And here's your most recent: http://conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=180526#p3944055
Okay, so maybe I didn't explicitly ask for the name of the suggestion, but there was very obviously an unspoken invitation for you to spill the beans, and in both instances you just left it hanging there as a big mystery.
Dukasaur wrote:I think there were other occassions too, but I can't find them, so I'll leave it with those two examples.
Woodruff wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:TeeGee wrote:Would be a shame to lose a member of your calibre
Maybe you need to head to the suggestions forums and suggest we make BR's more regularly available? The community is not without voice, but unless it's in the appropriate section of the forum, it is more than likely going to go unnoticed. I suggest you make the thread and gather the support of the masses. let the powers that be know what you want.
You mean the forum where there is a suggestion that has had significant community support and has been an accepted change to be made for more than seven years but hasn't been implemented yet? I'm afraid that forum supports what Butters is referring to, rather than being a method to correct it.
You mean the elusive Mystery Suggestion that you repeatedly refer to but never identify, despite me having asked you for clarification on at least half a dozen occasions? I'm starting to think this suggestion is as elusive as the Abominable Snowman. and the Loch Ness Monster.
I'm going to go ahead and call you a liar (perhaps you'd like to prove me wrong?), because I'm always more than happy to point it out. Here you go:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=535&t=73328
Thanks for the link. It's a "meh" suggestion to me. Nothing wrong with it, but unimportant. I think if you have so many foes that you don't remember who they are, you might consider changing your criteria.
My "criteria" are those who are in the Cheating & Abuse forum and found guilty of various behavior (whether it is abuse in the game or abuse of other players or whatever). Those are people I am not interested in playing. I guess I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you on that one, because I definitely don't think your statement is a valid one. Never mind the fact that it goes against the whole "foe and move on" suggestion that we CONSTANTLY HEAR ON THIS SITE. "Foe and move on" simply does not work without that being fixed.Dukasaur wrote:And here was your first opportunity to have enlightened me: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=141615&start=45#p3095413
And here's your most recent: http://conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=180526#p3944055
Okay, so maybe I didn't explicitly ask for the name of the suggestion, but there was very obviously an unspoken invitation for you to spill the beans, and in both instances you just left it hanging there as a big mystery.
Truthfully, I don't see where you even sort of vaguely hinted at wanting to know what the thread was. You didn't really seem to care. So I really don't see how you find either of those to be justification for your statement at all.Dukasaur wrote:I think there were other occassions too, but I can't find them, so I'll leave it with those two examples.
Thank you for proving my point.
rhp 1 wrote:I agree with both sides.. it's not that big of a deal suggestion, but I think it's a good one... and researching players in a game you want to join to make sure they aren't foed by you does seem a bit silly... great, you foed someone, but you can still find yourself in a game with them, sorta lame...
owenshooter wrote:i just came back to this thread... pining for one of my favorite players i has assumed had been lost to the site forever... looking to read over his final words and remember the good times... shock and awe, he is online!!! HUZZAH!!! the black jesus is rejoicing!!! the black jesus has spoken.-el Jesus negro
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: gonssal