Jonty125's Mad Mafia Game Over

[NoSurvivors]

Unvote vote benga

I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.

Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?

Unvote vote Anark

Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...

Eh.. now my post looks scummy too

[Eldario]

NOOOO....! i trusted you oh mighty votecounter, oh why hafe thou forsaken me

[nagerous]

Unvote vote benga

I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.

Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?

Unvote vote Anark

Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...

Eh.. now my post looks scummy too

Hmmm....

[nagerous]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

[jdean1]

I am confirming the message.

[NoSurvivors]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

[Anarkistsdream]

Unvote vote benga

I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.

Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?

Unvote vote Anark

Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...

....

Have you ever seen ANY Reality TV? Or any game where it comes down to two players? Why would you want to be on the chopping block?

Nice jump on absolutely nothing, guys... Way to look neutral.

FOS both of those ignorant reasons.

[NoSurvivors]

Unvote vote benga

I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.

Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?

Unvote vote Anark

Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...

....

Have you ever seen ANY Reality TV? Or any game where it comes down to two players? Why would you want to be on the chopping block?

Nice jump on absolutely nothing, guys... Way to look neutral.

FOS both of those ignorant reasons.

let the games begin...

The reason I initially said that was because it originally looked to me as though you were getting a little too upset that people were joke-voting you.. that's all. I assumed afterwards that it was a joke, but now you are getting rather defensive about it, throwing around (what seem like) serious FOS's around.

[NoSurvivors]

Nice jump on absolutely nothing, guys... Way to look neutral.

On a more off topic note, I am sigging that it made me chuckle.

[Iron Butterfly]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

Why would you try to shift focus from the first important exchange of the game??

[edocsil]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

Why would you try to shift focus from the first important exchange of the game??

Yeah, to me this is backpedling, which is odd and more scummy than anark being an anarchist.

[Anarkistsdream]

... I am actually kinda touched. That is weird.

Thanks, folks. You all know I am pretty hardcore about everything.

For those of you that don't, if I am wrong, I will never admit it... Even my wife hates that...

Let's kill us some mafia, muthaf***as.

[NoSurvivors]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

Why would you try to shift focus from the first important exchange of the game??

Not trying to shift anything, but I realize where that comes from-- it did seem that way. I just thought the evidence wasn't really enough for Loot to look scummy as it seemed more "jokey".

[Iron Butterfly]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

Why would you try to shift focus from the first important exchange of the game??

Not trying to shift anything, but I realize where that comes from-- it did seem that way. I just thought the evidence wasn't really enough for Loot to look scummy as it seemed more "jokey".

But you were. You stated we had a week to go so no hurry BUT we can always come back to this. If you did not believe the exchange important why would you wish to revisit it?

[NoSurvivors]

Nag thoughts:

Tight deadline, but no substance actually posted yet to make any reasoned thoughts - purely spam.

Anark, a player who wears his heart on his sleeve has gone for a kill or be killed approach, which is typical him, everyone has a survival instinct. What is more suspicious perhaps is Lootifer's instantaneous attack on Nark following on his vote on Benga. Could be jokey and playful or something more sinister.

Kinda, but I mean I am not sure he was being all that serious with it... but better than nothing... we still have a week though... not really an urgent issue. We can come back to this is there arent any other posts... but that is just my opinion. Others' may differ.

Why would you try to shift focus from the first important exchange of the game??

Not trying to shift anything, but I realize where that comes from-- it did seem that way. I just thought the evidence wasn't really enough for Loot to look scummy as it seemed more "jokey".

But you were. You stated we had a week to go so no hurry BUT we can always come back to this. If you did not believe the exchange important why would you wish to revisit it?

Oh I see where the confusion is now. I said we could revisit it if we got nothing better out of people. I mean, it would be better than nothing... (then again if I remember mafia correctly there is also a no lynch which could also be beneficial? ). There is usually better evidence on someone, that's all. It was more of an "okay, it's something, but we would only need that if we ended up with nothing else.. let's wait before making an accusation"

[Iron Butterfly]

So if we ended up with nothing else what would you take away from this exchange?

[Lootifer]

@ Nag/Anark: I agree (and Anarks response matches up with what I expected). It was just a good opportunity to get out of rvs.

unvote vote NoSurv

I am reading a couple of scummy things here (and I am not including the diversion thing 'cause that only works if I am scum too): A back-peddle after they realise they just sheeped a pretty crap - non-rvs - wagon, and a lot of wishy-washy non-committal posting with some buddying to boot.

[NoSurvivors]

So if we ended up with nothing else what would you take away from this exchange?

Okay. I do not feel that it is evidence enough to be suspicious.

You are the one who said it was important. I don't feel that way. The reason I said "we could come back to it" was so that naggy's efforts weren't in vain.

[NoSurvivors]

@ Nag/Anark: I agree (and Anarks response matches up with what I expected). It was just a good opportunity to get out of rvs.

unvote vote NoSurv

I am reading a couple of scummy things here (and I am not including the diversion thing 'cause that only works if I am scum too): A back-peddle after they realise they just sheeped a pretty crap - non-rvs - wagon, and a lot of wishy-washy non-committal posting with some buddying to boot.

May I ask what vrs means?

And backpedaling? I was asked for explanation, so I gave it. How is that backpedaling? lol

[Lootifer]

Random voting stage.

And im not referring to the same thing as edoc. Im talking about you're double post where you said "oh that last post of mine looks scummy". Backpeddling or trying to make light of a mistake, either way it strikes me as suspicious.

[Nebuchadnezer]

Meh...I don't really see the NoSurvivors issue.

I do see Lootifer vote hopping...I know something had to get us out of joke voting, but you seem to be hopping. This could just be me not knowing your playstyle, but I don't like it...

FOS Lootifer

[Lootifer]

Heh. I've just come from a couple of games over at mafiascum. They're much more liberal with their votes over there (I was going to ask why the hell anark was fosing and ib/edoc not doing anything with their votes lol).

[jonty125]

Vote Count

Benga (4) - benga; edocsil; virus90; Anarkistsdream;
Anarkistsdream (3) - Hotshot53; crasp; Eldario;
virus90 (2) - NoSurvivors; Iron Butterfly;
crasp (1) - safariguy5
Hotshot53 (1) - new guy1
jdean1 (1) - kgb007;
Nebuchadnezer (1) - Nebuchadnezer
NoSurvivors (1) - Lootifer

With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Deadline is Monday, 24th February @ 1800 GMT. If the vote count were to remain as so at deadline a 24-hour runoff period would be enforced.

crasp, Hotshot53, kgb007 & new guy1 have been prodded

[NoSurvivors]

Random voting stage.

And im not referring to the same thing as edoc. Im talking about you're double post where you said "oh that last post of mine looks scummy". Backpeddling or trying to make light of a mistake, either way it strikes me as suspicious.

Lol yeah it's pretty much exactly what it was.. I just thought its be better for me to admit it, rather than for it to look even scummier by not.. I did not realize until after i posted -oh crap thats not right-... My apologies I suppose ill be suspect number 1 because of it

[kgb007]

Unvote vote benga

I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.

Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?

Unvote vote Anark

Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...

Eh.. now my post looks scummy too

i actually don't find nosurv's double post to be suspicious after reading through the exchange a few times but i could see where people would want to jump on it

i'll shift the focus to game setup, 16 players, no VTs, how many mafia can we fairly expect? 3? 4? and a SK? or 3rd party?

purely speculation but perhaps this little exchange between nosurv/lootifer/IB/anark/edoc is a bit of misdirection by mafia, i mean i just listed 1/3 of the players so odds are one of them aren't town!!