Moderator: Community Team
Wingnut 16ga wrote:Tviorr,
I take offense to your comment "(simple) effort (i.e. joining vast amount of games and playing them with reasonable effort)". Do you think it's easy playing 300 active games, not missing a turn, and playing with the desire to win?
I find it amusing that so many find something wrong with a new format. So what if this months challenge is based on games played + plus wins...not everyone thinks every challenge should be the same. And it is just this months challenge I'm sure June will bring something different also.
Wingnut 16ga
zips5000 wrote:Wingnut 16ga wrote:Tviorr,
I take offense to your comment "(simple) effort (i.e. joining vast amount of games and playing them with reasonable effort)". Do you think it's easy playing 300 active games, not missing a turn, and playing with the desire to win?
I find it amusing that so many find something wrong with a new format. So what if this months challenge is based on games played + plus wins...not everyone thinks every challenge should be the same. And it is just this months challenge I'm sure June will bring something different also.
Wingnut 16ga
Not trying to be mean, but I completely disagree. There are many people here could play that many games if they wanted to - its not that hard to do.
Wingnut 16ga wrote:You missed the point entirely. Why do all challenges have to be the same? This one was different so why is that bad? Is it bad only because you are not playing enough games to be competitive in the challenge? If you don't like the format then don't participate. Just because you don't like the format is not reason for you to down grade the challenge and the players that choose to participate. A challenge is just that a challenge this one happens to be a challenge that requires you play an ass load of games to have a shot at the green star. Don't be negative toward the players that have decided to give it a shot. And Tviorr if you think it's easy why complain just join us. Hmmm let me guess scared of loosing some points?
Wingnut 16ga wrote:Tviorr,
I take offense to your comment "(simple) effort (i.e. joining vast amount of games and playing them with reasonable effort)". Do you think it's easy playing 300 active games, not missing a turn, and playing with the desire to win?
I find it amusing that so many find something wrong with a new format. So what if this months challenge is based on games played + plus wins...not everyone thinks every challenge should be the same. And it is just this months challenge I'm sure June will bring something different also.
Wingnut 16ga
Wingnut 16ga wrote:You missed the point entirely. Why do all challenges have to be the same? This one was different so why is that bad? Is it bad only because you are not playing enough games to be competitive in the challenge? If you don't like the format then don't participate. Just because you don't like the format is not reason for you to down grade the challenge and the players that choose to participate. A challenge is just that a challenge this one happens to be a challenge that requires you play an ass load of games to have a shot at the green star. Don't be negative toward the players that have decided to give it a shot. And Tviorr if you think it's easy why complain just join us. Hmmm let me guess scared of loosing some points?
kizkiz wrote:Has anyone mentioned kahunah deadbeating in a few games yet?
kizkiz wrote:Am i the only one that alchemistry has foed in this comp or is it some tactic of his to try and stop the opposition? lol
DoomYoshi wrote:kizkiz wrote:Has anyone mentioned kahunah deadbeating in a few games yet?
No, thank you for letting me know. Do you have game #s?
Gilligan wrote:zips5000 wrote:Wingnut 16ga wrote:Tviorr,
I take offense to your comment "(simple) effort (i.e. joining vast amount of games and playing them with reasonable effort)". Do you think it's easy playing 300 active games, not missing a turn, and playing with the desire to win?
I find it amusing that so many find something wrong with a new format. So what if this months challenge is based on games played + plus wins...not everyone thinks every challenge should be the same. And it is just this months challenge I'm sure June will bring something different also.
Wingnut 16ga
Not trying to be mean, but I completely disagree. There are many people here could play that many games if they wanted to - its not that hard to do.
It's also asking a lot for someone that has a job or is taking classes to play so many games. There will always be one that has a ton of free time and can do this, but most cannot. Limiting the number of points from joining games would make it fairer, IMO.
hwhrhett wrote:Gilligan wrote:zips5000 wrote:Wingnut 16ga wrote:Tviorr,
I take offense to your comment "(simple) effort (i.e. joining vast amount of games and playing them with reasonable effort)". Do you think it's easy playing 300 active games, not missing a turn, and playing with the desire to win?
I find it amusing that so many find something wrong with a new format. So what if this months challenge is based on games played + plus wins...not everyone thinks every challenge should be the same. And it is just this months challenge I'm sure June will bring something different also.
Wingnut 16ga
Not trying to be mean, but I completely disagree. There are many people here could play that many games if they wanted to - its not that hard to do.
It's also asking a lot for someone that has a job or is taking classes to play so many games. There will always be one that has a ton of free time and can do this, but most cannot. Limiting the number of points from joining games would make it fairer, IMO.
most medals have always required a heavy game load, i dont think anybody got any of the normal platinum medals without playing a thousand games... is this really any different?
ElricTheGreat wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Scoreboard
This link takes us to the July Banner ... not the May Scoreboard
ooge wrote:For all you players who thought you were getting 2 medals 50 for a ga medal 150 for a challenge medal..to bad!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users