I seek insight from Mrswdk and Macbone and all those from or in the region.

also

--Andy
Moderator: Community Team



Reminds me of my friend who always said that the only reason he went to anti-war protests in the 60s was to get laid.macbone wrote:Hong Kong's the only place in China where the Tiananmen Square protests are remembered. Every year, there's a big rally in Victoria Park. I've never gone, but I'm thinking about going this year.
Back when the government was pushing national education last year as part of the primary and secondary school curriculum, a group of secondary students formed one of the protest groups called Scholarism. I read an interview recently with Joshua Wong, one of the founders, and he mentioned that one of the great things about protesting is all the great food he ended up eating. He met with an activist who had been at Tiananmen Square, and the only thing they talked about was potatop chips.
Here's the article: http://hk-magazine.com/city-living/article/joshua-wong
So Mr Changsha isn't far off the mark. =)

Well, officiallymacbone wrote:Hong Kong's the only place in China where the Tiananmen Square protests are remembered
If they come for you, grab your groceries immediately.mrswdk wrote:Well, officiallymacbone wrote:Hong Kong's the only place in China where the Tiananmen Square protests are remembered
Google's basically stopped working for the last couple of days. I've had to resort to Bing. What a pain in the ass.
Google's recent China woes are directly related to the anniversary.mrswdk wrote:Well, officiallymacbone wrote:Hong Kong's the only place in China where the Tiananmen Square protests are remembered
Google's basically stopped working for the last couple of days. I've had to resort to Bing. What a pain in the ass.
Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
Chinese government was very precise whit Google... If Google wants to work in China it should obey Chinese law. Google didn't so he was blocked. Simple.Phatscotty wrote:Google's recent China woes are directly related to the anniversary.
Who is that we? I for example can not be included in your "we".Phatscotty wrote:Nobody knows what happened to that guy who blocked the tank, which means we probably know what happened to him.
The event was about freedom of the people not economic strength and more shoe styles in the stores.GoranZ wrote:Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
Chinese government was very precise whit Google... If Google wants to work in China it should obey Chinese law. Google didn't so he was blocked. Simple.Phatscotty wrote:Google's recent China woes are directly related to the anniversary.
Who is that we? I for example can not be included in your "we".Phatscotty wrote:Nobody knows what happened to that guy who blocked the tank, which means we probably know what happened to him.
If you are referring that the tank run over him then you should read more before writing something. For now the main question is: who was he? After learning who was he then finding more info about him will be easier.
Overall one thing is certain... Chinese government back then got the message and 25 years after the event China is on road to become Economically strongest country in the world.

I'm pretty sure not. I don't support nationalism in any silly sense, silly GoranZ. You are all silly.GoranZ wrote:Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
I almost forgot... Another one: Andy is blood thirstyAndyDufresne wrote:I'm pretty sure not. I don't support nationalism in any silly sense, silly GoranZ. You are all silly.GoranZ wrote:Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
--Andy
You've finally worked your way into complete irrelevance. You started by providing some reasonable alternative viewpoints, and have gradually become more extreme until you're just a caricature of yourself. Just another propaganda stooge on the KGB payroll. Although living in the poverty-ridden shithole you live in, I suspect they don't have to pay you very much.GoranZ wrote:Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
Chinese government was very precise whit Google... If Google wants to work in China it should obey Chinese law. Google didn't so he was blocked. Simple.Phatscotty wrote:Google's recent China woes are directly related to the anniversary.
Who is that we? I for example can not be included in your "we".Phatscotty wrote:Nobody knows what happened to that guy who blocked the tank, which means we probably know what happened to him.
If you are referring that the tank run over him then you should read more before writing something. For now the main question is: who was he? After learning who was he then finding more info about him will be easier.
Overall one thing is certain... Chinese government back then got the message and 25 years after the event China is on road to become Economically strongest country in the world.
I live where I live... I do what I do... And you only read what you want to read, and that is Western point of view. Whats interesting is that you are way off from the truth, you are not aware how muchDukasaur wrote:You've finally worked your way into complete irrelevance. You started by providing some reasonable alternative viewpoints, and have gradually become more extreme until you're just a caricature of yourself. Just another propaganda stooge on the KGB payroll. Although living in the poverty-ridden shithole you live in, I suspect they don't have to pay you very much.GoranZ wrote:Andy you forgot... I dont support what Andy is posting since he is always supporting American Imperialistic Goals.
Chinese government was very precise whit Google... If Google wants to work in China it should obey Chinese law. Google didn't so he was blocked. Simple.Phatscotty wrote:Google's recent China woes are directly related to the anniversary.
Who is that we? I for example can not be included in your "we".Phatscotty wrote:Nobody knows what happened to that guy who blocked the tank, which means we probably know what happened to him.
If you are referring that the tank run over him then you should read more before writing something. For now the main question is: who was he? After learning who was he then finding more info about him will be easier.
Overall one thing is certain... Chinese government back then got the message and 25 years after the event China is on road to become Economically strongest country in the world.
Protests generally only occur because the protestors are unsatisfied/frustrated with their individual lives. The protestors in 1989 were mostly poor, bored students.notyou2 wrote:The event was about freedom of the people not economic strength and more shoe styles in the stores.
mrswdk wrote:Protests generally only occur because the protestors are unsatisfied/frustrated with their individual lives. The protestors in 1989 were mostly poor, bored students.notyou2 wrote:The event was about freedom of the people not economic strength and more shoe styles in the stores.
Maybe economic growth and greater standard of living wasn't the stated goal of the people who went to the square that year, but fast forward 25 years and some massive economic growth and I don't see many people in Beijing who would think it's worth their time to spend several weeks sat in Tiananmen shouting about the government (although a small number of people from the countryside still turn up to complain about land seizures from time to time).
My friends who complain about the government gripe about freedom of speech and official corruption, but they don't actually say they want democracy and they don't seem pissed enough to do anything about their moans. Their lives are comfortable and they can see that their standard of living already greatly outstrips what their parents had at their age.

Another way of thinking about it is to consider the number of Chinese you know who are genuinely democratic in outlook (when dealing with their children, staff, elderly parents etc). In my experience most Chinese people are at heart authoritarian - given half a chance - in their own lives. Therefore following the maxim that 'people generally get the governments they deserve' it should be of no great surprise that a people like the Chinese have failed to achieve anything even resembling democracy in public life.mrswdk wrote:Protests generally only occur because the protestors are unsatisfied/frustrated with their individual lives. The protestors in 1989 were mostly poor, bored students.notyou2 wrote:The event was about freedom of the people not economic strength and more shoe styles in the stores.
Maybe economic growth and greater standard of living wasn't the stated goal of the people who went to the square that year, but fast forward 25 years and some massive economic growth and I don't see many people in Beijing who would think it's worth their time to spend several weeks sat in Tiananmen shouting about the government (although a small number of people from the countryside still turn up to complain about land seizures from time to time).
My friends who complain about the government gripe about freedom of speech and official corruption, but they don't actually say they want democracy and they don't seem pissed enough to do anything about their moans. Their lives are comfortable and they can see that their standard of living already greatly outstrips what their parents had at their age.

AndyDufresne wrote:I wonder what was groceries he has purchased in bags. As someone not from the area, I can't imagine. Based on his attire and video, insight is much appreciated.
--Andy

Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Something which could be said about absolutely any country in the world, including all the liberal democracies.notyou2 wrote:The improvement in the standard of living is a stop gap measure instituted by the state. Yes it's working.........for now. Your own post proves that there is dissatisfaction, it is just a matter of time and extent of the dissatisfaction before it erupts again and the people want more
Yes, that's why you removed the part where I said that.mrswdk wrote:Something which could be said about absolutely any country in the world, including all the liberal democracies.notyou2 wrote:The improvement in the standard of living is a stop gap measure instituted by the state. Yes it's working.........for now. Your own post proves that there is dissatisfaction, it is just a matter of time and extent of the dissatisfaction before it erupts again and the people want more
