Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:I perfectly agree with boone and that was my point.
Boone, are you more interested in the hotshot case today than you were yesterday?
HotShot53 wrote:Not sure what is so important about the iron throne...
mtamburini wrote:##VOTE NO LYNCH
I havent caught up in the readings yet but Im glad we can talk in the night so I can go over my reads on what I think has happened today. Expect something in a couple hours just going to go shower and make some more food.
boonetown wrote:mtamburini wrote:##VOTE NO LYNCH
I havent caught up in the readings yet but Im glad we can talk in the night so I can go over my reads on what I think has happened today. Expect something in a couple hours just going to go shower and make some more food.
that's a long ass shower...
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
boonetown wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Not sure what is so important about the iron throne...
i do not understand how you can say that. you know what game we're playing, right?
please explain to me where you were coming from with this.
pretender77 wrote:does hotshot have experience in mafia....Im trying to figure out if where he is coming from with his slightly weird posts
I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
Army of GOD wrote:pretender77 wrote:FYI we need to be very careful in the next day phase about voting. I can EASILY see us getting L-3 and there being like a triple voter popping in there and lynching someone. Lets be careful
Curious as to why you're pointing this out.
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
pancakemix wrote:I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing.Army of GOD wrote:pretender77 wrote:FYI we need to be very careful in the next day phase about voting. I can EASILY see us getting L-3 and there being like a triple voter popping in there and lynching someone. Lets be careful
Curious as to why you're pointing this out.
Yeah, this is kind of an odd thing to wonder about. What makes you say this, pretender?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
And to what end did you feel the need to reveal that?
pancakemix wrote:charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
And to what end did you feel the need to reveal that?
pretender77 wrote:Well for one neb had 2 votes on the final vote count if im not mistaken
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
boonetown wrote:while i understand what you are saying, you understand that if a mafia currently sits on the throne, and crasps says "so and so it on the throne" the mafia can say "no i'm not" and get him lynched?
i'm just saying, outting a name, regardless of the throne or not, doesnt really help town as much as it helps mafia. especially if they have a role that allows them to check a player and get their character name.
does that make sense?
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
pancakemix wrote:I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing.
StorrZerg wrote:End of votes Day 1
Current Vote Count
Voting ends 6/28 @ 16:00 CC time
Reminder any role pm actions must be in 1 hour before the dead line.
Mudpuppy(0): strike wolf
Strikewolf(0): Jmac1026
Epitaph(0): pretender77
Jak111(0): Charm, pancakemix
Jonty125(1): legionnare, jwiedlin
betiko (0): firth4eva, strike wolf, Army of God, Nebuchadnezer, jwiedlin, Jmac1026
27ninjabunnies (1): Iron Butterfly, Jak111
mtamburini (1) MudPuppy
Firth4eva (9): Betiko, strike wolf, Epitaph1, HotShot53, pancakemix, legionnare, kgb007, pretender77, jak111, crasp
crasp(3): Nebuchadnezer, HotShot53, Charm, Zivel, pretender77, jak111, jonty125, pershy
HotShot53(1): crasp, legionaire, jwiedlin, boonetown
Iron Butterfly (1): Zivel
jweidlin (1): 27ninjabunnies
Zivel (1): Nebuchadnezer
Voting No Lynch (1): mtamburini
Those who have do not have placed votes (0)
FANTASTIC EVERYONE PLACED A VOTE WOOOT!!!!
pancakemix wrote:pretender77 wrote:Well for one neb had 2 votes on the final vote count if im not mistaken
Look again, it's not there. Think it was an error and mod fixed it.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
pancakemix wrote:I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing..
betiko wrote:What someone does in the first place is try to get a claim before considering lynching someone.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users