Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote:I am saying it is 1 anti-town +5 town. Didn't the Dreadfort come out 2/4?
betiko wrote:Oh and regarding legionnare:
Either he is scum and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is town and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is scum and robik didn t bleed him: interesting to interrogate him
Either he is town and robik didn t bleed him: we would out X to save a watcher/tracker
So robik, can you tell us a bit more, is it one full day to kill someone you bleeded? Also, did jak use his power in the nights before you took over the role?
Fp x2
betiko wrote:legionnare wrote:betiko wrote:Ok interesting legionnare.
Here is the question though: how would you know who X is? How could you know we were talking of the same person? That s the flaw of your story.
News from the dread fort:
X visited braavos and says there is 1/5 anti town
Y tracked legionnare and he visited me. (Y does not control what he will learn at night). So this part adds up.
Basically, all your story adds up great, only that there is no way for you to know who X is, unless you can prove otherwise.
Fp
I assumed x was the same in both our cases, I Tracked someone who visited Pershy, you say someone revealed in your City QT that they also tracked someone visiting Pershy. Perhaps two people visited Pershy that night and my assumption about my player x being a doctor/other protective role is correct and your player x is someone different. I don't know.
So what you are saying basically;
A) you were so sure that pershy could have only been visited by the same person, therefore, the person you had been following. So the guy you had been following and tracking for 2 nights was necesairly mister X, just because you think it s improbable that 2 people could visit the same person the same night.
B) your story only works if you are both tracker and watcher. So far, all characters have spot on roles. I would like you to give your character name to give a better flavour of all this.
C) I see no reason not to out varys. Crasp kept on saying how scummy she looked in the QT and she is a proved liar. Lord varys is....
D) I m almost tempted to ask you to tell us who X is according to you. But you are supposedly bleeding to death, so I think you are not worth lynching anyway. Either you die tomorow, either robik is a liar. If you came up with X s name, I would buy your story. But if you are town you have no need to out a town to save yourself if you are already dead walking... If you are not, well robik is a liar and we can have this conversation tomorrow.
So i m fine with hearing from the secret qt people. I keep on seeing people report bad vibes from charm/varys. What s all this about? Also, crasp hasn t revealed much details about that secret qt...
Fp
IAmRobik wrote:How do I filter soemone's posts?
betiko wrote:Well too bad for crasp... I understand better his qt thing with varys, but he was never very eloquent about it. We just know who varys is and that the discussions were extremely unproductive with that person. That person lied and said he/she was in king s landing while it s obviously not true by the way. Crasp kept on saying varys is scummy... But didn t give us any real evidence.
I have no problem to out varys if you guys want to.
Fp
Nebuchadnezer wrote:...I would be happy to out varys and get a full claim...or perhaps we just have zivel deal with varys.
betiko wrote:Zivel, why the hell did you actively remove pretender from braavos? It s just starting to be annoying to see all these strange stuff with you. Did he leave town?
Also, i m not so sure about neb being in storm s end, he might just me in the secret qt with varys.
On the mud puppy thing. Dang. X wrote in our qt that his night 1 result in the dread fort said 2/5. It just doesn t add up!!
So reminder:
Night 1 dread fort: 2/5. Firth was lynched day 1 so 2/5 would make sense
Night 2 king s landing: 1/5. IB was dead, hotshots died that same night... Maybe hotshots was included as he was there the entire night?... Results come in when the night ends though
Night 3 braavos: 1/5. One player has investigative immunity?
Nebuchadnezer wrote:I find varys to be somewhat scummy as well. It's interesting that varys lied to crasp...I feel varys has been rather dodgy within our QT. Even lying about his/her city is such a small thing, and I wouldn't understand why. However, this seem to fit with mafia play this game...I would be happy to out varys and get a full claim...or perhaps we just have zivel deal with varys.
There have been three scummy/questionable actions in our Qt that I didn't like. Nothing huge. Nothing I could make a case of ...but it's really starting to add up against Varys with this new info.
I will hold off outting as well...until we hear more players ask for it.
betiko wrote:Oh and regarding legionnare:
Either he is scum and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is town and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is scum and robik didn t bleed him: interesting to interrogate him
Either he is town and robik didn t bleed him: we would out X to save a watcher/tracker
So robik, can you tell us a bit more, is it one full day to kill someone you bleeded? Also, did jak use his power in the nights before you took over the role?
Fp x2
legionnare wrote:betiko wrote:Oh and regarding legionnare:
Either he is scum and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is town and robik actually bleeded him: no point in telling, he is dead anyways
Either he is scum and robik didn t bleed him: interesting to interrogate him
Either he is town and robik didn t bleed him: we would out X to save a watcher/tracker
So robik, can you tell us a bit more, is it one full day to kill someone you bleeded? Also, did jak use his power in the nights before you took over the role?
Fp x2
If I use my power again I die without being able to report the results so outing x to save watcher/tracker would be pointless. I say again, given the potential power of x's role his/her name will go to the grave with me.
legionnare wrote:If I use my power again I die without being able to report the results so outing x to save watcher/tracker would be pointless. I say again, given the potential power of x's role his/her name will go to the grave with me.
betiko wrote:Night 1 dread fort: 2/5. Firth was lynched day 1 so 2/5 would make sense
Night 2 king s landing: 1/5. IB was dead, hotshots died that same night... Maybe hotshots was included as he was there the entire night?... Results come in when the night ends though
Night 3 braavos: 1/5. One player has investigative immunity?
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
kgb007 wrote:More to comment on but not enough time right now but regarding the investigation results in braavos, I believe Zivel already restated he was immune so the results make sense to me, we started as 6 and we're still 6.
Since AOG is already confirmed as a fellow braavosian, he's my top pick as our scum. He basically stated in the middle of D3 that he won't be posting in our QT (not that he had been there or here very much) bc of his suspicions of jak. I'll admit that jaks style can be annoying and throw scum vibes but I've played with him multiple times now in which his style is the same regardless of alignment. We've since seen an uptick in discussion primarily between Zivel, rob and another player who hasn't come forward with his location in the main discussion.
Still don't like charm. It was a half claim, no night abilities/actions. Your only power is to sit in a special QT by yourself now? You didn't trust crasp why? He claimed D1. It's easy to speak ill of the deceased when they're not around to defend themselves but why did you think he was scum? We know he's not so why would he lie about anything regarding varys? Something doesn't add up. Maybe betiko can clarify the lie he seems to heard about charm but betiko/crasp' word against your's
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Zivel wrote:Update:IAmRobik wrote:How do I filter soemone's posts?
- Advanced search at the top of the page.
- 'Game of Thrones' in the keywords
- 'username' in the search for author
- Find the mafia forums in the drop down list
- No to subforums
- Sort results by ascending
- Return first to 'all available' in the down down
betiko wrote:Zivel, why the hell did you actively remove pretender from braavos? It s just starting to be annoying to see all these strange stuff with you. Did he leave town?
Also, i m not so sure about neb being in storm s end, he might just me in the secret qt with varys.
On the mud puppy thing. Dang. X wrote in our qt that his night 1 result in the dread fort said 2/5. It just doesn t add up!!
So reminder:
Night 1 dread fort: 2/5. Firth was lynched day 1 so 2/5 would make sense
Night 2 king s landing: 1/5. IB was dead, hotshots died that same night... Maybe hotshots was included as he was there the entire night?... Results come in when the night ends though
Night 3 braavos: 1/5. One player has investigative immunity?
Epitaph1 wrote:legionnare wrote:If I use my power again I die without being able to report the results so outing x to save watcher/tracker would be pointless. I say again, given the potential power of x's role his/her name will go to the grave with me.
I'm a little confused by this statement. Legion, you will die if you use your power again? If so, then you're essentially a VT at this point. Also, can you start using a different letter than "X" to describe your target? I'm getting confused because you and betiko are not talking about the same person at this point and he's been using X to describe one of the people in the Dreadfort for the past mafia day or so.betiko wrote:Night 1 dread fort: 2/5. Firth was lynched day 1 so 2/5 would make sense
Night 2 king s landing: 1/5. IB was dead, hotshots died that same night... Maybe hotshots was included as he was there the entire night?... Results come in when the night ends though
Night 3 braavos: 1/5. One player has investigative immunity?
Investigations are usually executed before NK's, so I think the 1/5 on KL was correct--at least so far as it recognized 5 people total in that location. As far as Braavos goes, I'm working on the assumption that each location started with 6--we at least know that the Dreadfort and KL started with 6. So, either X's investigation didn't recognize Zivel or there is another role there that isn't recognized.
If the investigation just didn't recognize Zivel and there really is only 1 anti-town in Braavos, there must be a few anti-town in Storm's End. If there are only 5 mafia, it would be the remaining two plus maybe a 3p (Varys)? 3 out of 6 seems like a lot of anti-town for one location though.
If the investigation didn't recognize another role, presumably anti-town, I still don't think it should call into question the KL investigation. The difference being that last night's result does not recognize all the current living members of Braavos, whereas the KL investigation was accurate on that point.
I'm voting Charm for the moment. I haven't liked the way she's played for much of the game and now she's been outed as lying to crasp, who's flipped town and who most of us agreed was town earlier on.
betiko wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:legionnare wrote:If I use my power again I die without being able to report the results so outing x to save watcher/tracker would be pointless. I say again, given the potential power of x's role his/her name will go to the grave with me.
I'm a little confused by this statement. Legion, you will die if you use your power again? If so, then you're essentially a VT at this point. Also, can you start using a different letter than "X" to describe your target? I'm getting confused because you and betiko are not talking about the same person at this point and he's been using X to describe one of the people in the Dreadfort for the past mafia day or so.betiko wrote:Night 1 dread fort: 2/5. Firth was lynched day 1 so 2/5 would make sense
Night 2 king s landing: 1/5. IB was dead, hotshots died that same night... Maybe hotshots was included as he was there the entire night?... Results come in when the night ends though
Night 3 braavos: 1/5. One player has investigative immunity?
Investigations are usually executed before NK's, so I think the 1/5 on KL was correct--at least so far as it recognized 5 people total in that location. As far as Braavos goes, I'm working on the assumption that each location started with 6--we at least know that the Dreadfort and KL started with 6. So, either X's investigation didn't recognize Zivel or there is another role there that isn't recognized.
If the investigation just didn't recognize Zivel and there really is only 1 anti-town in Braavos, there must be a few anti-town in Storm's End. If there are only 5 mafia, it would be the remaining two plus maybe a 3p (Varys)? 3 out of 6 seems like a lot of anti-town for one location though.
If the investigation didn't recognize another role, presumably anti-town, I still don't think it should call into question the KL investigation. The difference being that last night's result does not recognize all the current living members of Braavos, whereas the KL investigation was accurate on that point.
I'm voting Charm for the moment. I haven't liked the way she's played for much of the game and now she's been outed as lying to crasp, who's flipped town and who most of us agreed was town earlier on.
Basically, legionnare s defense is that he thinks he knows who X is, and he came up with a nice little story where he first watched crasp N1, saw that someone visited crasp so he decided to track that someone on night 2, and that someone visited pershy N2 just like X. His whole story is based on the fact that he was 100% sure that crasp was town, and he was 100% sure that only one person could have visited pershy on night 2, therefore he thinks he knows who is the real X.
His whole defense relies on this, which is weak as piss. Robik most likely killed him though.
Robik, I think at this point you need to tell us what exactly you have done to legion. It is not clear and I am just assuming the person dies the following day/night.
I think it s very likely that if robik/jak has such power, jak targeted someone (hotshots is my best guess) night 1 and he didn t end up dead before ond of night 2? Then jak didn t use or didn t have time to use it night 2 that s why there was only one kill night 3?
Fp a few times
betiko wrote:Well too bad for crasp... I understand better his qt thing with varys, but he was never very eloquent about it. We just know who varys is and that the discussions were extremely unproductive with that person. That person lied and said he/she was in king s landing while it s obviously not true by the way. Crasp kept on saying varys is scummy... But didn t give us any real evidence.
I have no problem to out varys if you guys want to.
Fp
SiriusCowKing wrote:betiko wrote:Well too bad for crasp... I understand better his qt thing with varys, but he was never very eloquent about it. We just know who varys is and that the discussions were extremely unproductive with that person. That person lied and said he/she was in king s landing while it s obviously not true by the way. Crasp kept on saying varys is scummy... But didn t give us any real evidence.
I have no problem to out varys if you guys want to.
Fp
Sounds like the best lead. Funny thing is, varys is charm, and I had my votes on her from day 2. I will go ahead and ##vote charm. I hope people listen to me more next time I have a theory.
For those who still doesn't get it, here is how I knew charm was anti-town from day 2:
-Night 1, charm and strike wolf get roleblocked, only 1 kill occurs. We now know that strike wolf is town so charm is the anti-town that was denied a kill.
-Night 2, the mafia roleblocker admits blocking bunnies, which we know was town. 2 kills occur. There was only 1 roleblock this night but there are many possibilities of why only 1 roleblock.
-Night 3, only 1 kill occurs but IAmRobik admits trying on legion and legion comes out saying his role had resilience. This proves that the normal amount of kills per night is 2, so a kill was indeed blocked in night 1. So far no one claims to have been roleblocked.
Legion's theory is that she would be the town roleblock, which actually makes me think he's trying to protect her and thus they are both mafia. If she was the town roleblocker, how could there be 2 roleblocks night 1. If it was the case, she would have been prevented from using her power and thus strike wolf would not have been roleblocked.
IAmRobik wrote:We can discuss my ability at a later time, but it's not the bleeding you perceive it to be. I said earlier that I thought it could be completely useless and that maybe I wouldn't be able to kill anyone anyway, so you can think about it and make of it what you'd like. There's a chance that death by a shot is instant, but I would not know it until it happens.
Blah, I hate being this cryptic, but I don't want to just out that shit cause there's no good reason to at this moment. Also, legion might not die tomorrow. 1) it depends on me and whether we decide that he's town 2) it depends on legion's role -- from what he said about his role in our QT, he might not die
Users browsing this forum: No registered users