Moderator: Community Team
And if that doesn't work then tell their mommy and she'll take away their Playstation.crispybits wrote:The point is to make it crystal clear how abhorrent their views are.
Then debate about the allegedly known boundary of 'unknown'. Much of metaphysics is about this.shickingbrits wrote:What if you have some known unknowns?
Agree, well said.BoganGod wrote:
No topic should be taboo, as long as fellow site users address the topic, rather than the person. Then everything should be fine.
Except, these are clearly antagonistic labels and therefore not truly discussing the topic.BoganGod wrote: I should be allowed to vent/preach/share my distrust of hetrosexuals, dismissing them as breeders, conformist sheep and needy simpletons. .
It's your mom's saggy tits and her equally saggy pussy lips.Army of GOD wrote:what the f*ck is "insert blank" and why do people want it censored?
No, but on the condition I get to call them c-units.mrswdk wrote:Should bigotry be actively censored and punished on the fora or not?
Three cheers for free speech. Welcome to the rainbow!Lootifer wrote:No, but on the condition I get to call them c-units.mrswdk wrote:Should bigotry be actively censored and punished on the fora or not?
Glad someone picked up on that......PLAYER57832 wrote:Agree, well said.BoganGod wrote:
No topic should be taboo, as long as fellow site users address the topic, rather than the person. Then everything should be fine.
...except:
Except, these are clearly antagonistic labels and therefore not truly discussing the topic.BoganGod wrote: I should be allowed to vent/preach/share my distrust of hetrosexuals, dismissing them as breeders, conformist sheep and needy simpletons. .
So while your stated opinion is apropos, you then proceeding to essentially violate it.
true, now BBS are you insinuating that racists are the shit?BigBallinStalin wrote:Unfortunately, when bigotry and the like is censored, it prevents other people from detecting who is a bigoted, racist turd.
