Moderator: Cartographers
IcePack wrote:Lets revamp the site to not look 1996, then we can look at the maps.



































































rdsrds2120 wrote:I voted yes. From an administrative standpoint, holding work for the sake of work is backwards thinking. If we can assert ourselves to aim to provide our users with a more top-notch experience in every aspect of the site (yes, yes, things haven't been perfect, I know), then I believe that we certainly should! The perfect solution would be ender's skins idea, but that is something that would take quite a bit of time to setup and complete.
BMO





















thenobodies80 wrote:Now, it seems to me that 78% could be considered a sort of "yes, go with it"...no?


































































Gilligan wrote:That turtle is my new best friend.






































































































macbone wrote:ManB, the first map you posted in this thread is beautiful. Man. I'd love to play on a luscious map like that.





















Ace Rimmer wrote:Honestly, can anyone really compare this:
to this:
and not think that the first looks better? Not perfect, but compare them and look. Don't be complacent, demand that maps are as beautiful as Tisha (and her maps).






























5
5
2



19
3
9


MrBenn wrote:If this map is to be revamped then it should be done in an appropriate cartoon/fantasy/surrealism style that befits the Discworld Series.
























from the movie adaption.






















































Users browsing this forum: No registered users