Navy SEAL Robert O'Neill Who Shot Osama Bin Laden

[GoranZ]

And CNN forgot to ask the correct question... or it was (intentionally) cut out.

Q: With how many bullets did you kill Osama?
O'Neill: All of them.

P.S. No doubts he would do the same to other terrorist if asked to avenge his country. Hats off soldier.

[DaGip]

These traitors should keep their mouths shut.

[Army of GOD]

Haha he's such a douche for coming out with this

[mrswdk]

A People's Liberation Army soldier would never boast of killing in this manner.

[DaGip]

A People's Liberation Army soldier would never boast of killing in this manner.

Yeah, Americans are so fucking full of themselves. He should have kept his mouth shut, along with the other traitor that wrote a book. Not only do they make themselves look bad, their leadership in the Navy looks bad, and they could have possibly compromised future missions. Also, their safety and the people around them could also have been compromised.

[BigBallinStalin]

A People's Liberation Army soldier would never boast of killing in this manner.

Yeah, Americans are so fucking full of themselves. He should have kept his mouth shut, along with the other traitor that wrote a book. Not only do they make themselves look bad, their leadership in the Navy looks bad, and they could have possibly compromised future missions. Also, their safety and the people around them could also have been compromised.

Usually, the relevant military branch censors parts of the book, so I wouldn't worry about this. What's more worrisome is the government abusing the vague 'national security' argument to censor other parts that are already public information or aren't that relevant to 'national security'. Black Banners, written by a former FBI agent, is a good example. Government bureaus can also fire people who write critical books--e.g. Easterly's White Man's Burden and Peter van Buren's We Meant Well. Governments tend to dislike their insiders letting people know how incompetent their governments are. That's the worst aspect which people tend to overlook.

RE: the rest, the glorification of extra-judicial killings by government authorities has always made me uneasy. Before 9/11, terrorist incidents were investigated, evidence was gathered, and convictions ensued. After 9/11, it's almost nothing but extra-judicial killings.

[smegal69]

must have need to drum up more business for his " Motivation speaking"

sad he turned his back on his brothers and broke the rules....... oh well maybe he will get blown up now

[GoranZ]

A People's Liberation Army soldier would never boast of killing in this manner.

Chinese government will announce almost nothing of any killing . Mostlikely the terrorist organization will confirm the death of their leader, something like Caucasus Emirate about their leader Dokka Umarov.
But for Americans are different... they like to measure d**ks

[DaGip]

must have need to drum up more business for his " Motivation speaking"

sad he turned his back on his brothers and broke the rules....... oh well maybe he will get blown up now

Thusly why no intelligent human being would attend such a motivational speech. I can already see a bomb going off and hundreds of people injured or dead. I wouldn't let him speak in my hotel or building!

[thegreekdog]

I understand that he came out with this because it was going to come out anyway and he wanted to control it. Whatever that means.

[Dukasaur]

I don't see what the big deal is. The operation is over, there is no security risk. Why wouldn't he be allowed to discuss it?

The very fact that people think there is something wrong with black ops being publicly discussed after the fact is a terrible symptom of how much the basic underpinnings of democracy have been forgotten.