Moderator: Community Team
Apparently the population of Saudi Arabia.mrswdk wrote:That's a pretty weak interpretation.
In any case, I don't understand what point any of this is supposed to prove. Oh noes, women in Saudi Arabia are required to dress in Islamic dress. Who cares?
Hmm, wiki has Saudi Arabian muslims at 25,493,000, China at 23,308,000.mrswdk wrote:Fun fact: there are more Muslims from China than there are from Saudi Arabia.
There are more Chinese from China than there are from Saudi Arabia too!mrswdk wrote:Fun fact: there are more Muslims from China than there are from Saudi Arabia.
The practice of harvesting of executed prisoners' organs has already surfaced, been pounced on by politicians and subsequently outlawed.Symmetry wrote:Fun fact: In 1999 China cracked down on the Falun Gong religious movement. Shortly afterward the number of organ transplants rose sharply. Investigations have indicated that China is harvesting the organs of political prisoners for transplant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilgour%E2 ... tas_report
Well, if it's a practice that already been acknowledged, it can't be wrong. Thanks for the clarification mrswdk. Once again your moral compass has pointed true.mrswdk wrote:The practice of harvesting of executed prisoners' organs has already surfaced, been pounced on by politicians and subsequently outlawed.Symmetry wrote:Fun fact: In 1999 China cracked down on the Falun Gong religious movement. Shortly afterward the number of organ transplants rose sharply. Investigations have indicated that China is harvesting the organs of political prisoners for transplant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilgour%E2 ... tas_report
What's the next Symmetry Scoop gonna be - that the UK and China have started negotiating the terms of Hong Kong's return to China?
Well, if it's a practice that already been acknowledged, it can't be wrong. Thanks for the clarification mrswdk. Once again your moral compass has pointed true.mrswdk wrote:The practice of harvesting of executed prisoners' organs has already surfaced, been pounced on by politicians and subsequently outlawed.Symmetry wrote:Fun fact: In 1999 China cracked down on the Falun Gong religious movement. Shortly afterward the number of organ transplants rose sharply. Investigations have indicated that China is harvesting the organs of political prisoners for transplant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilgour%E2 ... tas_report
What's the next Symmetry Scoop gonna be - that the UK and China have started negotiating the terms of Hong Kong's return to China?
Symmetry wrote:Well, if it's a practice that already been acknowledged, it can't be wrong. Thanks for the clarification mrswdk. Once again your moral compass has pointed true.mrswdk wrote:The practice of harvesting of executed prisoners' organs has already surfaced, been pounced on by politicians and subsequently outlawed.Symmetry wrote:Fun fact: In 1999 China cracked down on the Falun Gong religious movement. Shortly afterward the number of organ transplants rose sharply. Investigations have indicated that China is harvesting the organs of political prisoners for transplant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilgour%E2 ... tas_report
What's the next Symmetry Scoop gonna be - that the UK and China have started negotiating the terms of Hong Kong's return to China?
It's sad that imprisoning people for political reasons and harvesting their internal organs has become so objectionable to people, especially politicians. I'm not sure why it should be brought up at all.
BTW, how did your test for psychopathy go?
So the psychopathy test didn't go well?mrswdk wrote:Symmetry wrote:Well, if it's a practice that already been acknowledged, it can't be wrong. Thanks for the clarification mrswdk. Once again your moral compass has pointed true.mrswdk wrote:The practice of harvesting of executed prisoners' organs has already surfaced, been pounced on by politicians and subsequently outlawed.Symmetry wrote:Fun fact: In 1999 China cracked down on the Falun Gong religious movement. Shortly afterward the number of organ transplants rose sharply. Investigations have indicated that China is harvesting the organs of political prisoners for transplant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilgour%E2 ... tas_report
What's the next Symmetry Scoop gonna be - that the UK and China have started negotiating the terms of Hong Kong's return to China?
It's sad that imprisoning people for political reasons and harvesting their internal organs has become so objectionable to people, especially politicians. I'm not sure why it should be brought up at all.
BTW, how did your test for psychopathy go?
The average American patient waits more than 4.5 years for a kidney. The average Chinese patient waits 2 weeks.
Personally, I don't see how it benefits society to outlaw the harvesting of organs from someone who is dead. A dead person no longer has any use for their kidney or liver, but someone who is still alive might.
It means there is almost no way for you to freely go to Saudi Arabia and visit the location as free person. In my eyes its Muslim men only. Maybe that's beautiful for you... but most of us dont share your excitement, and that can be clearly seen from previous posts.mrswdk wrote:That's a pretty weak interpretation.
In any case, I don't understand what point any of this is supposed to prove. Oh noes, women in Saudi Arabia are required to dress in Islamic dress. Who cares?
lmaooo. Well mrs none of these idiots are going to tell you what you want to hear , which is that this is a fn epic modern city built in the middle of the desert. They're not going to admit how awesome it is. because they are all too busy bad mouthing muslim countries and people, wah wah the women cant do anything wah wah.Even tho Saudi women are rich as shit and are living the good life . wah wah they hafto wear this or that they are so imprisoned wah wah . I personally think the Saudis are shit, but im amazed , astounded and in awe of the the things they've built over the last little while. I hafto reiterate tho, once the oil money is gone , these magnificent cities will become nothing but ghost towns. Also they don't have any military power, American puppets , good at taking American money.mrswdk wrote:So, to recap:

You think it's psychopathic to support organs being taken from dead bodies and given to hospitals for transplants?Symmetry wrote:So the psychopathy test didn't go well?mrswdk wrote:
The average American patient waits more than 4.5 years for a kidney. The average Chinese patient waits 2 weeks.
Personally, I don't see how it benefits society to outlaw the harvesting of organs from someone who is dead. A dead person no longer has any use for their kidney or liver, but someone who is still alive might.
I think it's psychopathic to support the harvest of human organs for political reasons. Do you genuinely not see a problem with that?mrswdk wrote:You think it's psychopathic to support organs being taken from dead bodies and given to hospitals for transplants?Symmetry wrote:So the psychopathy test didn't go well?mrswdk wrote:
The average American patient waits more than 4.5 years for a kidney. The average Chinese patient waits 2 weeks.
Personally, I don't see how it benefits society to outlaw the harvesting of organs from someone who is dead. A dead person no longer has any use for their kidney or liver, but someone who is still alive might.
You are confusing two separate issues here:Symmetry wrote:I think it's psychopathic to support the harvest of human organs for political reasons. Do you genuinely not see a problem with that?mrswdk wrote:You think it's psychopathic to support organs being taken from dead bodies and given to hospitals for transplants?Symmetry wrote:So the psychopathy test didn't go well?mrswdk wrote:
The average American patient waits more than 4.5 years for a kidney. The average Chinese patient waits 2 weeks.
Personally, I don't see how it benefits society to outlaw the harvesting of organs from someone who is dead. A dead person no longer has any use for their kidney or liver, but someone who is still alive might.
This seems to bother you Goranz.GoranZ wrote:mrswdk wrote:No.GoranZ wrote:source: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 26,00.htmlSaudi Arabia bans use of Gregorian calendar, English language in state bureaus, hotels; order use of Islamic calendar, Arabic only
Is this enough to support what I said?
http://xrdarabia.org/2012/05/23/saudis- ... n-english/
Saudis Don’t Ban English
A reader pointed me to a very strange article he’d come across:
Saudi Arabia bans English language.
As this made no sense, I took a look to see what it was all about.
I’m not sure how an article could come out wrong-headedly. The article it cites, from the UAE’s Gulf News, says nothing about dropping English. Instead, it reports that the Saudis are insisting that the Hijri or Islamic calendar be used for dating purposes on all official and business documents. This does makes sense because the Hijri Calendar is indeed the national calendar. Translations from one calendar to another already create problems when they’re necessary. Performing those translations when not necessary just creates more problems.
The Gulf News article also quotes an unnamed Saudi daily saying that hotels and the like should use Arabic to greet customers on the phone. That’s a suggestion, not a ban. It makes sense, too, because Saudi Arabia’s population speaks Arabic, though English has certainly become an unofficial second language.
English is the language of instruction at both King Abdullah University of Science and Technology and King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals. It is taught in Saudi public schools starting at the fourth grade.
Two recent articles in Arab News also stress the importance the Kingdom and its residents place on English:
Kingdom expands English education
English the ‘preferred language for business’Lets see what Gulf News article says about English... source: http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/saudi-ara ... -1.1024301mrswdk wrote:The article it cites, from the UAE’s Gulf News, says nothing about dropping EnglishSeems to me that blogger on xrdarabia only reads what he want, not whats written.Dubai: Saudi Arabia has banned all government and private agencies from using the Gregorian calendar in official dealings.
The use of the English language to answer calls or communicate, mainly in companies and hotels, has also been banned, a local daily said...
There is another interesting limitation for women in Saudi Arabia... I presume this applies to you if you dont mask as men
http://www.theweek.co.uk/middle-east/60 ... ia-cant-do
P.S. You should also check your name, it might be forbidden in Saudi Arabia.
Once again... Is this enough to support what I said?

That's an interesting statement. This in fact may be where the differences lie and why one has a longer wait time.mrswdk wrote:You think it's psychopathic to support organs being taken from dead bodies and given to hospitals for transplants?
So you can use deceased people (long term success reduction) and you can skimp on the matching requirements (greater chance of rejection) but this will drastically reduce your "wait time." Or you can do what they do in other countries and steal kidneys as needed from living victims.Unlike many other types of organ donation, it is possible to donate a kidney while you are alive because you only need one kidney to survive. This is known as a living donation.
People who want to be considered as a kidney donor are tested very carefully to ensure they are a suitable donor and are fit for the operation needed to remove a kidney.
Ideally, living donations will come from a close relative because they are more likely to share the same tissue type and blood group as the recipient, which reduces the risk of the body rejecting the kidney. However donations from those who are not blood relatives are sometimes possible.
Kidney donations are also possible from people who have recently died. This is known as deceased kidney donation. However, this type of kidney donation has a slightly lower chance of long-term success.

He's hoping to use feminism as his latest excuse for why he doesn't pick up checks or walk his dates home at the end of the evening.notyou2 wrote:This seems to bother you Goranz.
According to Saudi Arabia, atheists are its greatest enemies. I'm just fulfilling what they wantnotyou2 wrote:This seems to bother you Goranz.
Luckily for me I dont live in Saudi Arabia... BTW did you find your husband in Saudi Arabia? As far as I know Saudi men are not allowed to see their future wifes before the weeding.mrswdk wrote:He's hoping to use feminism as his latest excuse for why he doesn't pick up checks or walk his dates home at the end of the evening.notyou2 wrote:This seems to bother you Goranz.
How are these not linked?mrswdk wrote:You are confusing two separate issues here:Symmetry wrote:I think it's psychopathic to support the harvest of human organs for political reasons. Do you genuinely not see a problem with that?mrswdk wrote:You think it's psychopathic to support organs being taken from dead bodies and given to hospitals for transplants?Symmetry wrote:So the psychopathy test didn't go well?mrswdk wrote:
The average American patient waits more than 4.5 years for a kidney. The average Chinese patient waits 2 weeks.
Personally, I don't see how it benefits society to outlaw the harvesting of organs from someone who is dead. A dead person no longer has any use for their kidney or liver, but someone who is still alive might.
- the arrest of Falun Gong members for unspecified reasons
- the harvesting of prisoners' organs for transplant patients