Moderator: Community Team

And he asks for more money... probably he will get them. *3 saving programs in 7 yearsmrswdk wrote:Holds referendum on bailout terms, campaigns to reject them.
Bailout terms are overwhelmingly rejected by voters.
Forces resignation of finance minister who was vocally opposed to bailout terms.
Applies for bailout promising almost identical concessions.
wut? Greece was given the money to help it pay off its debts, not to have a party. Obviously the money was all going to go to people like banks.warmonger1981 wrote:How do you feel about the banks getting the money instead of Greece as Nigel stated?
You feel if someone got into loans that are unsustainable and just writes them off?warmonger1981 wrote:And what if I do feel if someone got into loans that are unsustainable and just writes them off?
I already told you why I didn't want to answer your question. Every single one of those questions is not very europe unique:warmonger1981 wrote:I don't think you answered my questions. Do you believe one economical system works for every country? Do you believe one central bank or one central agency dictating policy works for all countries? How do you feel about the banks getting the money instead of Greece as Nigel stated?
And FYI:warmonger1981 wrote:I don't think you answered my questions. Do you believe one economical system works for every country? Do you believe one central bank or one central agency dictating policy works for all countries? How do you feel about the banks getting the money instead of Greece as Nigel stated?
How very subtle, the american talking to the chinese about writing off debt. Nice trywarmonger1981 wrote:According to Nigel the money was to help bail out French, German and Italian banks. Not to help the Greek people. What does he mean by that then?
Your still not answering my questions Mrs.
And what if I do feel if someone got into loans that are unsustainable and just writes them off?
So please answer my questions and quit dodging the questions.
He means what he said... Greece had debt towards French banks(It should be noted that French banks had as much more of Greek debt as German and Italian banks combined), they were giving credits to Greece for the last 30 years without securing adequate collateral, if there was any collateral at all.warmonger1981 wrote:According to Nigel the money was to help bail out French, German and Italian banks. Not to help the Greek people. What does he mean by that then?


Do you even know what fascism is?warmonger1981 wrote:I hardly believe China will be a free market capitalist country. More fascist I would believe it to become.
If regulated properly transatlantic free trade area could be beneficial for both Europe and America. But the terms for everything must be set before establishing the area... For example if there is a crysis everyone to be well aware what the consequences will be, not like with EU to stitch the problems as they come.warmonger1981 wrote:So your saying yes, one economic ideology would work for everyone. So how do you feel about American and European corporation lobbying forTransatlantic Free Trade Area? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transat ... Trade_Area
IMF/World Bank have nothing to do with the current situation in Greece, they never had.warmonger1981 wrote:I'm sorry but central banking and currency are not strictly a European thing as you would suggest. I don't believe the IMF or World Bank have much to do with this current situation in Greece. You ever heard of Bank for International Settlements? I'm pretty sure the Euro is part of the global scheme so don't act like your situation is isolated from the rest of the world.
China recently had little problems with the stock exchange, I presume the lesson is learned, the market become too liberalized in the last year.warmonger1981 wrote:So if an economical situation doesn't work you make it work. Sounds like a totalitarian. I hardly believe China will be a free market capitalist country. More fascist I would believe it to become. If any of these countries tried to safeguard their own countries sovereignty no one would be in this situation. They would be letting their own particular country run on its own economic system. If we all have to save the banks then don't we all just work for the banks then.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... rtsEHiA-fw
He's just making a non sequitur. ’The money wasn't given to Greek people, hurr the banks'. What purpose would giving the money to Greek people serve?warmonger1981 wrote:According to Nigel the money was to help bail out French, German and Italian banks. Not to help the Greek people. What does he mean by that then?
The bailouts were to prevent Greece from defaulting on its debts and going bankrupt.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:They've bailed out the French, German and Italian banks. The Greeks are still in a lot of debt. Nothing has changed.
This isnt an action of compassion, its saving their own skins. Nigel has a point
No they werent, they were to buy Europe some more time. Greece will default in a year or so.mrswdk wrote:The bailouts were to prevent Greece from defaulting on its debts and going bankrupt.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:They've bailed out the French, German and Italian banks. The Greeks are still in a lot of debt. Nothing has changed.
This isnt an action of compassion, its saving their own skins. Nigel has a point
I see no reason to claim that the IMF bailed Greece out assuming that Greece would default in a few years anyway, given that no such assumption was made when Portugal, Spain and Ireland were given bailouts.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:No they werent, they were to buy Europe some more time. Greece will default in a year or so.mrswdk wrote:The bailouts were to prevent Greece from defaulting on its debts and going bankrupt.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:They've bailed out the French, German and Italian banks. The Greeks are still in a lot of debt. Nothing has changed.
This isnt an action of compassion, its saving their own skins. Nigel has a point
I'm not against a transatlantic free trade agreement, under certain conditions that is. For instance I would not want any american GMO's entering the european market. Monsanto can keep his garbage.warmonger1981 wrote:So your saying yes, one economic ideology would work for everyone. So how do you feel about American and European corporation lobbying forTransatlantic Free Trade Area? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transat ... Trade_Area or https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transat ... artnership or ISDS? I'm sorry but central banking and currency are not strictly a European thing as you would suggest. I don't believe the IMF or World Bank have much to do with this current situation in Greece. You ever heard of Bank for International Settlements? I'm pretty sure the Euro is part of the global scheme so don't act like your situation is isolated from the rest of the world.
So if an economical situation doesn't work you make it work. Sounds like a totalitarian. I hardly believe China will be a free market capitalist country. More fascist I would believe it to become. If any of these countries tried to safeguard their own countries sovereignty no one would be in this situation. They would be letting their own particular country run on its own economic system. If we all have to save the banks then don't we all just work for the banks then.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... rtsEHiA-fw
And you don't get my point. I tried to point out that you were asking questions that will do nothing else but lead the subject astray. It's not because you're in the OT that you have to lead OT-topics OT.warmonger1981 wrote:That's my point. The IMF and World Bank had nothing to do with Greece. I don't know why waauw even tried to equate them into the equation. The problem with the transatlantic partnership is that my senators can't speak about its provisions until its passed. Doesn't sound very transparent. Lobbyists working in secret to establish intercontinental regulations intertwining our economies.