so who is gonna claim dictator awaiting a coup ?

on that note, fun commercial: [YouTube] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYnL5oUePM8 [/YouTube]
Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote:soo... now we look for what? Scum ? opposing party members? i feel like there is not really a case to be build, just politics really? try to form alliances and survive?
so who is gonna claim dictator awaiting a coup ?i suggest we lynch all putins, chavez(yes i know he is dead), erdogan, al assads, mugabes etc.
on that note, fun commercial:
virus90 wrote:ahh so thats how it works. (youtube)
sure we can hunt, but i think in the end its more about making alliances, cause we might just have 2 - 3 ? 4? (16 players) parties of equal numbers, perhaps equal roles, who knows. go against eachother. so if there are multiple parties its gonna be about alliances aswell. 2 partys eliminating 1 from another party. i dont have a clue about the format either but since the first post said: be aware from the start the balance might be different i am just throwing out some ideas.
fped by got tonkad.
yes think epi is deffinatly interesting to look at.
if he is 3th party he is an interesting lynch for all parties i guess, i mean until you find out who are your party members its a save shot and gives information about the set up.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Epitaph1 wrote:Confirm.
My thought on the first Speaker is to anoint a VT or weak role. The Speaker is already going to have a target on his back so I'd rather not see us give it to a PR only to get whacked right off the bat.
fpd
End, why would you rather not be speaker?
Epitaph1 wrote:Well, in RL I don't think there is a political party actively trying to kill me--make of that what you will.
I was going to vote for myself but that has the same effect as abstaining. At least by abstaining I can still use my vote before the deadline if I choose instead of wasting it on myself.
I just can't get on board giving someone power based on nothing. I understand that someone has to be elected speaker right off the bat, so we've got to do something. However, I'm reserving my vote until someone does something that I find townie. I'm surprised how little discussion is going into this.
fpd
huh?
Streaker wrote:This is the equivalent of going for a no-lynch day 1. 'Let's just all abstain from voting, so nobody will be elected. It's the safest option.'
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
virus90 wrote:ahh so thats how it works. (youtube)
sure we can hunt, but i think in the end its more about making alliances, cause we might just have 2 - 3 ? 4? (16 players) parties of equal numbers
Endgame422 wrote:I think a claim or 2 will help clear things up.
If noone is scum just seperate parties then we wont be able to learn anything until we see who is defending who through the voting process.
Id personally like to have 1 from each side of the aisle claim, have streaker call the vote, and let the chips fall where they may.
got tonkaed wrote:Honestly this should go a fair amount like the Civil War mafia game did back in the day. If Epi wants to claim third party alignment, it is kind of a no brainer fall back option for both groups, since giving the upper hand to the other side is a no-no.
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
Epitaph1 wrote:
virus is the only one who explained his vote on Streaker. Not sure why everyone is ducking that question, unless I have to ask everyone one at a time--perhaps with a vote.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users