Moderator: Community Team

Would you like to join my usergroup?riskllama wrote:I bet if I applied myself, I could crack the top three, sym. unseating you and/or mrs would be a bit of a stretch...
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.

How would you define a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.
A good troll deviates from subject / causes issues / whatever but in doing so seems 100% genuine in everything they're doing. A few may see through it and appreciate the humour, but the majority won't. The best trolls often have a high level of intelligence.Dukasaur wrote:How would you define a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.

the thread is about the worse trolls so that's a moot point.iAmCaffeine wrote:A good troll deviates from subject / causes issues / whatever but in doing so seems 100% genuine in everything they're doing. A few may see through it and appreciate the humour, but the majority won't. The best trolls often have a high level of intelligence.Dukasaur wrote:How would you define a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.
For an example of a bad troll look here.


Yeah, but we went off on a tangent. Keep up.betiko wrote:the thread is about the worse trolls so that's a moot point.iAmCaffeine wrote:A good troll deviates from subject / causes issues / whatever but in doing so seems 100% genuine in everything they're doing. A few may see through it and appreciate the humour, but the majority won't. The best trolls often have a high level of intelligence.Dukasaur wrote:How would you define a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.
For an example of a bad troll look here.

you are not really answering the question. What is a good troll? is it a bad troll? or is a bad troll a good troll? or is a good troll a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:Yeah, but we went off on a tangent. Keep up.betiko wrote:the thread is about the worse trolls so that's a moot point.iAmCaffeine wrote:A good troll deviates from subject / causes issues / whatever but in doing so seems 100% genuine in everything they're doing. A few may see through it and appreciate the humour, but the majority won't. The best trolls often have a high level of intelligence.Dukasaur wrote:How would you define a good troll?iAmCaffeine wrote:I was about to say: there are trolls here, but none of them are actually good.Serbia wrote:The best trolls haven't been on this site in years [/oldguytalk]
Bollocks.
For an example of a bad troll look here.

I love cookies, if they are medicinal.apey wrote:Yes i made the list!!
Bernie Sanders (that guy annoys me i bet he is a cookie hater!)