Moderator: Community Team

Symmetry wrote:Trust you to keep pushing the boundaries on posting pictures of underage girls. You narrowly avoided a ban last time, so don't pretend to be virtuous using this as an example.
How about you quit pushing your agenda, M? The photo is important enough in its own right without your, frankly creepy, attention.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Not at all, precisely the opposite, in fact. Facebook's policy, as indeed CC's, is designed to remove the kinds of sexually explicit pictures of minors that got M into trouble. While I disagree with Facebook on this issue, I can see why they have the policy in place.Serbia wrote:Symmetry wrote:Trust you to keep pushing the boundaries on posting pictures of underage girls. You narrowly avoided a ban last time, so don't pretend to be virtuous using this as an example.
How about you quit pushing your agenda, M? The photo is important enough in its own right without your, frankly creepy, attention.![]()
Y'all want a single say fuck that. Fuck that, fuck that.
Hitler was a Buddhist, hence all the swastikas.william18 wrote:Wasn't Hitler only half Jewish?
Or was he Hindu?mrswdk wrote:Hitler was a Buddhist, hence all the swastikas.william18 wrote:Wasn't Hitler only half Jewish?
mrswdk wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37318031Facebook has controversially removed the iconic image of a girl fleeing a Napalm attack during the Vietnam war from a post, on the grounds of nudity.
The editor of Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten said the entire post, which was about iconic war imagery, was later deleted and the account of the reporter behind it suspended.
Espen Egil Hansenhas accused Mark Zuckerberg of "an abuse of power".
I for one am sickened, while also highly apprehensive as we begin our descent down the slippery slope.
Time to stop drinking tap water.
tzor wrote:Some people bruise easily.
