Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
2017-09-27 17:24:40 - tfh182: how can anybody take any thing I wrote serious when I complained about cards every turn. Come on men..... I do apologise if office was taken... I did post it here......
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.

Multi muchAchillesisGay wrote:poor baby..all concerned about ya rep? want some cheese with that whine, little girl?
Razorvich wrote:High Score: 2569
TeeGee has my PW... Wall him if I get below 1 Hour in CLAN GAMES ONLY !!
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
So if I go round telling everyone that iAmCaffeine is a cheat, that'd be ok with you, would it? What about that time you tried to engage in secret diplomacy with me? I declined but never mentioned it once ...until now. Hope you don't mind.iAmCaffeine wrote:Evidently.m1ndgames wrote:I simply have an issue
lol. you should see him lose his shit when you remin everybody about his former account(s)...m1ndgames wrote:So if I go round telling everyone that iAmCaffeine is a cheat, that'd be ok with you, would it? What about that time you tried to engage in secret diplomacy with me? I declined but never mentioned it once ...until now. Hope you don't mind.iAmCaffeine wrote:Evidently.m1ndgames wrote:I simply have an issue

I think I remember someone bringing it up once. I thought it unlikely at the time, given how many games he'd played, but have heard similar since. No smoke without fire.riskllama wrote:lol. you should see him lose his shit when you remin everybody about his former account(s)...m1ndgames wrote:So if I go round telling everyone that iAmCaffeine is a cheat, that'd be ok with you, would it? What about that time you tried to engage in secret diplomacy with me? I declined but never mentioned it once ...until now. Hope you don't mind.iAmCaffeine wrote:Evidently.m1ndgames wrote:I simply have an issue![]()
![]()
. priceless.
You probably shouldn't call yourself m1ndgames.m1ndgames wrote:So if I go round telling everyone that iAmCaffeine is a cheat, that'd be ok with you, would it? What about that time you tried to engage in secret diplomacy with me? I declined but never mentioned it once ...until now. Hope you don't mind.iAmCaffeine wrote:Evidently.m1ndgames wrote:I simply have an issue

sooo, you do realize this is not any sort of rule violation, right? misinformation is part of the game and can be used to one's advantage, especially in FOG games. taking the piss out of your username is simply brilliant, deal with it. even better, i bet you didn't notify him that you were turning him into C&A (i've taken care of that for you), so he could defend himself. sorry, you literally have zero claim here. not a rule violation and never will be. good luck with this, sorry about your little butt. the black jesus has spoken, time to lock this thread down...-Jésus noirm1ndgames wrote:As I said, joking about is fine, as is playing on the name or whatever.
I simply have an issue, and think it crosses a line, if someone is able to make others question someone's integrity with blatant lies.
Foeing, which I'll do anyway, achieves nothing other than blanking it from me.

Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
No. In this case, m1ndgames is making a good point. The concern is less about m1ndgames' reputation, per se, and more about the fact that tfh182 is potentially framing him for a C&A violation. In theory, another player/third party could bring an SD accusation against m1ndgames and then use thf182's fraudulent game chat as evidence!owenshooter wrote:sooo, you do realize this is not any sort of rule violation, right? misinformation is part of the game and can be used to one's advantage, especially in FOG games. taking the piss out of your username is simply brilliant, deal with it. even better, i bet you didn't notify him that you were turning him into C&A (i've taken care of that for you), so he could defend himself. sorry, you literally have zero claim here. not a rule violation and never will be. good luck with this, sorry about your little butt. the black jesus has spoken, time to lock this thread down...-Jésus noir.m1ndgames wrote:As I said, joking about is fine, as is playing on the name or whatever.
I simply have an issue, and think it crosses a line, if someone is able to make others question someone's integrity with blatant lies.
Foeing, which I'll do anyway, achieves nothing other than blanking it from me.
No, I didn't realise, hence the question.owenshooter wrote: sooo, you do realize this is not any sort of rule violation, right? misinformation is part of the game and can be used to one's advantage, especially in FOG games. taking the piss out of your username is simply brilliant, deal with it. even better, i bet you didn't notify him that you were turning him into C&A (i've taken care of that for you), so he could defend himself. sorry, you literally have zero claim here. not a rule violation and never will be. good luck with this, sorry about your little butt. the black jesus has spoken, time to lock this thread down...-Jésus noir
says the guy that reported someone for not violating ONE RULE. i challenge you to point to the ONE RULE that he has violated. you can't. frivolous accusation, waste of the mods time. sorry about your little butt... the black jesus has spoken... lock this ridiculous thread...-Jésus noirm1ndgames wrote:No, I didn't realise, hence the question.owenshooter wrote: sooo, you do realize this is not any sort of rule violation, right? misinformation is part of the game and can be used to one's advantage, especially in FOG games. taking the piss out of your username is simply brilliant, deal with it. even better, i bet you didn't notify him that you were turning him into C&A (i've taken care of that for you), so he could defend himself. sorry, you literally have zero claim here. not a rule violation and never will be. good luck with this, sorry about your little butt. the black jesus has spoken, time to lock this thread down...-Jésus noir
As for your sneaky, grass-like tendencies, if you'd taken the time to read the chat, you'd have seen that I said I was going to report him. Nothing hidden here. The only one who's shown their butt here is you.
ps. If you think taking the piss out of someone's name is 'simply brilliant', you ought to get out more.

i'm sorry, i must have missed the part where a rule was violated. there is no rule concerning game chat and mis-information. throw in the added hilarity of the users name and this all adds up to nothing... perhaps you could find an old post concerning a similar matter in which the accused was punished, then you'd have a defense. we all know how good you are at digging up old threads, Thor, help this guy out... guess what, none exist, because this is not against the rules. this is just like giving false info in a fog game... in team games i have been known to "accidentally" post team chat in the group chat, leaving false plans out there in the wind... people do it!! it is a tactic!!Thorthoth wrote:If stating deliberate falsehoods that are tantamount to accusing another of a rule violation they did not commit, is not itself an implicit rule violation, then CC's already shaky grasp on the underpinnings of justice completely dissolves.



Where else would someone go, who doesn't know whether lying like that is allowed, other than the C&A forum? I came here with a clear concern. The evidence is plain to see. What isn't is whether such a rule exists - maybe it should.IcePack wrote:Please take your discussion elsewhere.
C&A is for evidence on the case

You are the reporter. I’m talking about the others who are coming here like TT and Owen + llama now who aren’t providing evidence, but bantering back and forth.m1ndgames wrote:Where else would someone go, who doesn't know whether lying like that is allowed, other than the C&A forum? I came here with a clear concern. The evidence is plain to see. What isn't is whether such a rule exists - maybe it should.IcePack wrote:Please take your discussion elsewhere.
C&A is for evidence on the case
Fabricating game play or passing misinformation is one thing, smearing someone's reputation with lies is another. A massive, immoral other.
